[quote]DJHT wrote:
[quote]WestCoast7 wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
I’ve just had enough of La Buff.[/quote]
If y’all could replace him with someone else, who would it be?
[/quote]
Well its Hollywood, I am sure they want Tom Cruise or Seth Rogan[/quote]
Prequel or reboot set entirely on Cybertron, no humans, transformers designed by Giger, cybertronians able to adapt to their environment like Darwin of the X-Men. Thank you.
[quote]roybot wrote:
[quote]DJHT wrote:
[quote]WestCoast7 wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
I’ve just had enough of La Buff.[/quote]
If y’all could replace him with someone else, who would it be?
[/quote]
Well its Hollywood, I am sure they want Tom Cruise or Seth Rogan[/quote]
Prequel or reboot set entirely on Cybertron, no humans, transformers designed by Giger, cybertronians able to adapt to their environment like Darwin of the X-Men. Thank you. [/quote]
With Tom Cruise and Seth Rogan doing the voice over of course.
[quote]DJHT wrote:
[quote]roybot wrote:
[quote]DJHT wrote:
[quote]WestCoast7 wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
I’ve just had enough of La Buff.[/quote]
If y’all could replace him with someone else, who would it be?
[/quote]
Well its Hollywood, I am sure they want Tom Cruise or Seth Rogan[/quote]
Prequel or reboot set entirely on Cybertron, no humans, transformers designed by Giger, cybertronians able to adapt to their environment like Darwin of the X-Men. Thank you. [/quote]
With Tom Cruise and Seth Rogan doing the voice over of course. [/quote]
Of course. Cruise can voice all the Autobots and Rogan the Decepticons.
[quote]jacob-1310 wrote:
dark of the moon. best transformers film. is the serious now over since megatron has died? anyone heard of any new productions? [/quote]
Jason Statham a possible candidate to star in Transformers 4.
La Buff and Micheal Bay are both thru with the franchise.
http://www.movieweb.com/news/jason-statham-eyed-for-lead-in-transformers-4
Pre-Ordering my movie tickets now.
[quote]roybot wrote:
[quote]DJHT wrote:
[quote]roybot wrote:
[quote]DJHT wrote:
[quote]WestCoast7 wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
I’ve just had enough of La Buff.[/quote]
If y’all could replace him with someone else, who would it be?
[/quote]
Well its Hollywood, I am sure they want Tom Cruise or Seth Rogan[/quote]
Prequel or reboot set entirely on Cybertron, no humans, transformers designed by Giger, cybertronians able to adapt to their environment like Darwin of the X-Men. Thank you. [/quote]
With Tom Cruise and Seth Rogan doing the voice over of course. [/quote]
Of course. Cruise can voice all the Autobots and Rogan the Decepticons.[/quote]
We did forget the spunky female lead and the token black guy who cracks jokes.
God sometimes I really hate hollywood and the shit they produce.
[quote]DJHT wrote:
[quote]roybot wrote:
[quote]DJHT wrote:
[quote]roybot wrote:
[quote]DJHT wrote:
[quote]WestCoast7 wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
I’ve just had enough of La Buff.[/quote]
If y’all could replace him with someone else, who would it be?
[/quote]
Well its Hollywood, I am sure they want Tom Cruise or Seth Rogan[/quote]
Prequel or reboot set entirely on Cybertron, no humans, transformers designed by Giger, cybertronians able to adapt to their environment like Darwin of the X-Men. Thank you. [/quote]
With Tom Cruise and Seth Rogan doing the voice over of course. [/quote]
Of course. Cruise can voice all the Autobots and Rogan the Decepticons.[/quote]
We did forget the spunky female lead and the token black guy who cracks jokes.
God sometimes I really hate hollywood and the shit they produce. [/quote]
Me too. Which is why I want a prequel or reboot set entirely on Cybertron with no humans, transformers designed by Giger and Cybertronians able to adapt to their environment like Darwin.
The first transformers movie was tolerable, but too much focus on the humans. LaBuff was well cast in the sense that his character was based on Buster Witwicky from the cartoons (a skinny everykid).
Whole movie was too busy - transformers had too many moving parts. Hurt my eyes.
Second movie, as above but with added vitamin annoyance. I don’t know if my ass throbbed because the movie was so long or if I was fucked out of the ticket price.
Hugo Weaving’s voice was wasted by having him speak his dialogue through a drainpipe.
I will not be watching the third movie, nor will I see Wolverine 2 or Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance. There are some things you can’t atone for.
Sort of related: Sheer LaBuff claims to have beaten up Tom Hardy on the set of their new movie:
Tom Hardy’s response to the beef with LaBeouf:
http://www.screened.com/news/this-tom-hardyshia-labeouf-beef-just-got-hilarious/2573/
^ The “he was drinking moonshine” is a pop at LaBuff’s claims in an interview that he drank moonshine every day in preparation for his role.
^ Okay I like Hardy even more now with his response and I like the little douche Le-not-Buff even less.
[quote]DJHT wrote:
^ Okay I like Hardy even more now with his response and I like the little douche Le-not-Buff even less.[/quote]
I don’t normally get emotionally involved in this kind of thing, but LaBuff really is a classless little shit.
In the space of one interview he claims to have beaten up Tom Hardy, says he slept with Megan Fox when they were filming Transformers (while she was in a relationship with Brian Austin Green - they are now married) only to dismiss it as no big deal (don’t mention it then!), waxes lyrical on “materialism” and criticizes Hardy again for talking about expensive cars with another actor.
Tom Hardy is very open about his struggles with drugs and booze and says his addiction came from worrying about where his next acting job would come from. He also credits his trainer P-nut with turning his life around and helping him reinvent himself, so I think he’s earned the right to talk about his new car.
Labuff doesn’t seem to have experienced hardship.
^ Yes he has been the crazy world of Hollywood his whole life. I mean he is a child actor, fortune tellers would say he is about 98% chance of a hard fall.
But then again, writers have been known to take things out of context also, to make a story.
[quote]DJHT wrote:
^ Yes he has been the crazy world of Hollywood his whole life. I mean he is a child actor, fortune tellers would say he is about 98% chance of a hard fall.
But then again, writers have been known to take things out of context also, to make a story.[/quote]
True. But in this case I think LaBuff has done all the legwork himself. You couldn’t make this sort of thing up.
[quote]roybot wrote:
[quote]DJHT wrote:
^ Yes he has been the crazy world of Hollywood his whole life. I mean he is a child actor, fortune tellers would say he is about 98% chance of a hard fall.
But then again, writers have been known to take things out of context also, to make a story.[/quote]
True. But in this case I think LaBuff has done all the legwork himself. You couldn’t make this sort of thing up. [/quote]
True, because of how long he has been there he knows the ropes.
Why do you think he did this?
Is he trying to be the Mel Gibson or Stallone of this generation. By that I mean the action star and with this “persona” he will land these types of roles.
[quote]DJHT wrote:
[quote]roybot wrote:
[quote]DJHT wrote:
^ Yes he has been the crazy world of Hollywood his whole life. I mean he is a child actor, fortune tellers would say he is about 98% chance of a hard fall.
But then again, writers have been known to take things out of context also, to make a story.[/quote]
True. But in this case I think LaBuff has done all the legwork himself. You couldn’t make this sort of thing up. [/quote]
True, because of how long he has been there he knows the ropes.
Why do you think he did this?
Is he trying to be the Mel Gibson or Stallone of this generation. By that I mean the action star and with this “persona” he will land these types of roles.[/quote]
Not sure. LaBuff said that he’s done with the action genre for good in that interview. He’s probably just let fame go to his head. Not enough time spent in the real world, so when he ends up in it or with people from it (like Tom Hardy, who seems like a real salt-of-the-earth type), he throws a tantrum because they don’t kiss his feet. That’s about as good an explanation as any.
[quote]roybot wrote:
[quote]DJHT wrote:
[quote]roybot wrote:
[quote]DJHT wrote:
^ Yes he has been the crazy world of Hollywood his whole life. I mean he is a child actor, fortune tellers would say he is about 98% chance of a hard fall.
But then again, writers have been known to take things out of context also, to make a story.[/quote]
True. But in this case I think LaBuff has done all the legwork himself. You couldn’t make this sort of thing up. [/quote]
True, because of how long he has been there he knows the ropes.
Why do you think he did this?
Is he trying to be the Mel Gibson or Stallone of this generation. By that I mean the action star and with this “persona” he will land these types of roles.[/quote]
Not sure. LaBuff said that he’s done with the action genre for good in that interview. [/quote]
Now this I hope is true.
Labuff is no Mel Gibson. Eagle Eye didn’t work as a movie because he made a horrible leading man in it. He stills comes across as a little kid…which didn’t work in Transformers 3 or in Eagle Eye.
[quote]roybot wrote:
LaBuff said that he’s done with the action genre for good in that interview. [/quote]
Great- now he become a full-time physique/size model for the BB forum…
[quote]SteelyD wrote:
[quote]roybot wrote:
LaBuff said that he’s done with the action genre for good in that interview. [/quote]
Great- now he become a full-time physique/size model for the BB forum…[/quote]