Because it’s a fucking stupid question. What do you mean by official story, exactly?[/quote]
How can you call ‘truthers’ idiots without even knowing the official story that they doubt? Just because they don’t believe everything they’re told, even when it doesn’t agree with what they see?
[quote]I believe what I’ve said I believe. Insofar as that is the “official story,” the answer is yes.
Do you not?
[/quote]
Of course not.
Why would you believe the second plane was a United flight? What makes you believe a 757 hit the pentagon? What brought down WTC7, which never got hit by anything?
You say ‘truther’, I say skeptic. I don’t claim that it was a govt conspiracy, but I know the evidence doesn’t match up with the story.
Because it’s a fucking stupid question. What do you mean by official story, exactly?[/quote]
How can you call ‘truthers’ idiots without even knowing the official story that they doubt? Just because they don’t believe everything they’re told, even when it doesn’t agree with what they see?
[quote]I believe what I’ve said I believe. Insofar as that is the “official story,” the answer is yes.
Do you not?
[/quote]
Of course not.
Why would you believe the second plane was a United flight? What makes you believe a 757 hit the pentagon? What brought down WTC7, which never got hit by anything?
You say ‘truther’, I say skeptic. I don’t claim that it was a govt conspiracy, but I know the evidence doesn’t match up with the story.[/quote]
I know exactly what they argue against. It’s called reality. Start a 9/11 truther thread if you want to. I probably won’t participate, because I gave up arguing that point years ago.
[quote]smh23 wrote:
I will try again: if you don’t frequent conspiracy websites (which, by the way, it is painfully obvious to literally everyone on this board that you do), then where did the list come from?
If I had to guess, I’d say you’re stalling right now so that you can try and find that exact list on a semi-reputable website. If you don’t paste the link now, I’ll assume you don’t want to have this conversation and back away slowly, tinfoil hat in hand.[/quote]
Actually, I never had any intention of telling you, because its none of your business. You already know the original source of the info, so why does it matter to you where I got it from?
And that is absolutely hilarious that you admit to having a tinfoil hat. I knew there was a reason you know more about conspiracy websites than anyone else here does!
I know exactly what they argue against. It’s called reality.[/quote]
In your reality, this is the damage a 757, which has a wingspan of 125’, with a MTOW of 255,000lbs, including up to 11,489gal of fuel travelling 500mph does to a building.
And you have the nerve to call someone else stupid?
[quote]smh23 wrote:
Why are you embarrassed by where you got it from?
On this board, when someone asks for a source, it’s always given.
Why would you not share the source?[/quote]
Start a 9/11 “truther” thread if you’d like. This is a thread about trolling techniques started by YOU. So I’m asking YOU where you found the material you posted in the OP. Well? Why don’t you want to say?
[quote]smh23 wrote:
Why are you embarrassed by where you got it from?
On this board, when someone asks for a source, it’s always given.
Why would you not share the source?[/quote]
Start a 9/11 “truther” thread if you’d like. This is a thread about trolling techniques started by YOU. So I’m asking YOU where you found the material you posted in the OP. Well? Why don’t you want to say?[/quote]
Because it is literally none of your business.
[quote]smh23 wrote:
Why are you embarrassed by where you got it from?
On this board, when someone asks for a source, it’s always given.
Why would you not share the source?[/quote]
Start a 9/11 “truther” thread if you’d like. This is a thread about trolling techniques started by YOU. So I’m asking YOU where you found the material you posted in the OP. Well? Why don’t you want to say?[/quote]
Because it is literally none of your business.
Why are you so interested?[/quote]
You posted it on a public forum. I am interested because you have been pretending that it came from some kind of reputable source. It very obviously did not.
So, again, what legitimate reason would you have to keep its source under wraps? We always link when asked to on this board.
[quote]smh23 wrote:
Why are you embarrassed by where you got it from?
On this board, when someone asks for a source, it’s always given.
Why would you not share the source?[/quote]
Start a 9/11 “truther” thread if you’d like. This is a thread about trolling techniques started by YOU. So I’m asking YOU where you found the material you posted in the OP. Well? Why don’t you want to say?[/quote]
Because it is literally none of your business.
Why are you so interested?[/quote]
When you, JP, challenged me on a historical fact about Jefferson, I replied with my source. By knowing the source, one can learn more, or dispute the assertion in an honest fashion. One may draw one’s own conclusions freely.
Now here, where you post some litany of opinions, smh23 wants to know the source. If you cannot do so, it cannot be to preserve privacy, it can only be out of fear, fear of discovery, fear of embarrassment, fear that the source is indeed corrupt and disreputable.
So which is it? If this is not so, why not remove all doubt, answer smh23’s simple question, and we can all draw our own conclusions freely?
[quote]smh23 wrote:
Why are you embarrassed by where you got it from?
On this board, when someone asks for a source, it’s always given.
Why would you not share the source?[/quote]
Start a 9/11 “truther” thread if you’d like. This is a thread about trolling techniques started by YOU. So I’m asking YOU where you found the material you posted in the OP. Well? Why don’t you want to say?[/quote]
Because it is literally none of your business.
Why are you so interested?[/quote]
You posted it on a public forum. I am interested because you have been pretending that it came from some kind of reputable source. It very obviously did not.
So, again, what legitimate reason would you have to keep its source under wraps? We always link when asked to on this board.[/quote]
Here you go
[quote]smh23 wrote:
Why are you embarrassed by where you got it from?
On this board, when someone asks for a source, it’s always given.
Why would you not share the source?[/quote]
Start a 9/11 “truther” thread if you’d like. This is a thread about trolling techniques started by YOU. So I’m asking YOU where you found the material you posted in the OP. Well? Why don’t you want to say?[/quote]
Because it is literally none of your business.
Why are you so interested?[/quote]
You posted it on a public forum. I am interested because you have been pretending that it came from some kind of reputable source. It very obviously did not.
So, again, what legitimate reason would you have to keep its source under wraps? We always link when asked to on this board.[/quote]
Here you go
Hard to remember. I spend a LOT of time on the intarweebs.[/quote]
A sentence lifted at random from one of those sources:
“I believe firmly that we have been visited by seemingly “other wordly” intelligent beings but the question in my mind is “are they truly beings from another planet or are they from another time?” Before you dismiss me, hear me out.”
“Hear me out,” indeed.
This more or less gets at what I was after.
Anyway, I frequent this board because I enjoy the range of intelligent opinions on matters of public policy. Tilting at windmills is not something I’m looking to do.
[quote]smh23 wrote:
Why are you embarrassed by where you got it from?
On this board, when someone asks for a source, it’s always given.
Why would you not share the source?[/quote]
Start a 9/11 “truther” thread if you’d like. This is a thread about trolling techniques started by YOU. So I’m asking YOU where you found the material you posted in the OP. Well? Why don’t you want to say?[/quote]
Because it is literally none of your business.
Why are you so interested?[/quote]
You posted it on a public forum. I am interested because you have been pretending that it came from some kind of reputable source. It very obviously did not.
So, again, what legitimate reason would you have to keep its source under wraps? We always link when asked to on this board.[/quote]
Here you go
Sure, because that would require a yes or no answer.
Are you even paying attention?[/quote]
Yes, that is why I said “kind of like” - in essence, avoiding the question, whether it be avoidijng a “yes or no” answer or avoiding providing a source for a statement.
Which, is what you are doing, for what appear to be, now, obvious reasons.
[quote]smh23 wrote:
I will try again: if you don’t frequent conspiracy websites (which, by the way, it is painfully obvious to literally everyone on this board that you do), then where did the list come from?
If I had to guess, I’d say you’re stalling right now so that you can try and find that exact list on a semi-reputable website. If you don’t paste the link now, I’ll assume you don’t want to have this conversation and back away slowly, tinfoil hat in hand.[/quote]
Actually, I never had any intention of telling you, because its none of your business. You already know the original source of the info, so why does it matter to you where I got it from?
And that is absolutely hilarious that you admit to having a tinfoil hat. I knew there was a reason you know more about conspiracy websites than anyone else here does![/quote]
Wouldn’t part of the fact checking you bray on about yourself be um checking where you got your facts from and not just looking at some random list of statements?
