Does it need to be specified every time? Of course it’s happening in Democrat run cities. You were saying it was because of population density and I was countering that narrative. Hell, Mexico City should be constantly rioting if it were a factor of population density.
And it’s not a mere correlation. They allow the riots to happen. They refuse to prosecute the rioters and hence the rioters face no consequences. If you allow rioting to happen in a place where people want to riot, then the riots will happen. Path of least resistance.
The population density and demographics
This is separate from this:
Population density?
The “and” combines them.
The feminist movement was either a catalyst or a primary result of the sexual revolution and they hate men.
I am a feminist by definition (I think they should have equal rights), and I don’t hate men.
By that definition we all feminists (most men normal men I suspect). We’re not talking about reasonable people here, we’re talking about the ugly, mouth breathing wackos in the movement who think the bridges lifted in Chicago represent the patriarchy and should be torn down.
Does this article represent you?
'Upward-thrusting buildings ejaculating into the sky' – do cities have to be...
Toxic masculinity is built into the fabric of our urban spaces, writes Leslie Kern, author of new book Feminist City. And the results aren’t just divisive – they can be lethal