No, he didn’t omit it, because he had no obligation to say it.
1 Like
Muslims don’t need stickers when they are openly exposing their loyalty to the ideology that threatens us all. The Boston bombers, and the shooters from Fort Hood, San Bernardino, and Orlando all had more than just a few red flags going on that we missed.
They weren’t even red flags, it was more like the fucking Bat signal in the sky that they were likely to unleash some hellish shit.
Sure, Trump doesn’t know shit, and neither do our current “experts” like Obama, Hillary and GW Bush. The missed the boat with our current threat. If the “experts” are as bad as the dummy, why both suggesting one or many are better than another ?
Can you explain to my why a trailer trash opioid-snorting white boy is worse than a gangbanging inner city thug who voted for Obama for nothing more than his skin tone and promises of “dat free shit” ? We can examine the dropout rates among minorities who voted for Obama and their HS dropout rates if you like, it would probably mirror or be worse than those stupid crackers who plan to vote for Trump.
Our principles have been stripped already, tell me the last Conservative speaker to lecture at a university who wasn’t chased out of the auditorium nude. That’s still better than being shot, beheaded, or having a truck radiator driven into your rectum because you are a non-believer.
1 Like
Give it a rest.
His post count is probably 20 to 1 against Trump as opposed to Clinton.
Logic demands that the person who anyone dislikes the most would get the most attention.
We’ve been through this and through this…it’s actually getting boring as is PWI
1 Like
Off to an early lunch talk to you guys later.
It is my understanding that there were not clear signals. The Orlando shooter was investigated twice by the FBI and they found nothing. What “fucking bat signals” did they miss that you have clearly identified? If that signal is present elsewhere, should people be detained? Stripped of rights (guns)?
I don’t think that is the logic here. I think there are Trump supporters on this forum so the conversation centers around their arguments for Trump and the counter-arguments against him. Nobody is defending Hillary’s position so the only way to have posts about her are to repeat them on your own. If there was somebody defending Hillary’s possition I’m sure the Hillary post count would go up.
Therefore I don’t think his post count is an accurate reflection of his position, I think it would be better to actually see his stated position (both are garbage and he won’t support either) and use that. His objective statements about the long and/or short term impact are guesses can be discussed without pretending anybody is a secret Hillary/Trump supporter who said they’re not.
You’re absolutely right what was I thinking of?
Silly me.
Today I will begin speaking highly of Hillary and see how many of you Trump haters jump on me for it.
Okay here I go…um Hillary is…err…Hillary is a…um…Hillary sure is a good liar!
Oh well I tried.
LOL
1 Like
I may come back after lunch and I may come back after October. PWI is starting to feel like Groundhog Day. Great movie by the way.
Signals like a co-worker making complaints that he was dangerous. A gun store owner who called the FBI after he tried to purchase body armor. The clerk said he was unable to identify him, but the FBI could have looked at video surveillance from the store’s cameras and see if he was already on the FBI watch list. As far as detaining him, at bare minimum they could have gotten a search warrant for his residence and taken a look at the stock pile of weapons and Jihadi bullshit found on his computer (he had pro-ISIS bullshit on his Facebook). When there is smoke there is fire, that’s all I am saying.
Yes, not just 2nd Amendment rights, but also 1st Amendment rights too. The Left has succeeded in silence-shaming Conservatives, this is the go-around the Left uses instead of using legal actions to silence the Right. They can’t win the debate so they’re left trying to win the rhetoric.
2 Likes
I thought we didn’t pay ransoms.
I get what you’re saying, but I don’t believe it’s possible for the “smoke” signals that you’re suggesting. If a co-worker complains I’m dangerous, is that enough for a search warrent on my house?
To me, it is easy to look back on these situations and piece the puzzle together showing how the needle in the haystack could have been identified but when they’re filtering through 300M people it’s not as easy to see the signs. To me, there was no “fucking bat signal”.
Are you referencing anything I said when you mention this? I’m not sure how this ties in. Related to silencing conservatives, in what way? I can find a number of talk radio hosts who are not silent.
1 Like
[quote=“MaximusB, post:1207, topic:218984, full:true”]
Muslims don’t need stickers when they are openly exposing their loyalty to the ideology that threatens us all. The Boston bombers, and the shooters from Fort Hood, San Bernardino, and Orlando all had more than just a few red flags going on that we missed. [/quote]
It is unclear what you think this has to do with the awesome stupidity of a government policy predicated on discovering the individual, interior religious convictions of millions of people.
[Quote]
Sure, Trump doesn’t know shit, and neither do our current “experts” like Obama, Hillary and GW Bush. [/quote]
Their politics aside, each of those three people forgets in a single day more than Trump will ever know about public policy and world affairs (not that that’s terribly impressive: the same can be said of some high-school gym teachers). No one believes that any of them don’t understand the very most basic things about governance. And none of them have a habit of openly proposing the economic and geopolitical decimation of the United States of America.
[Quote]
Can you explain to my why a trailer trash opioid-snorting white boy is worse than a gangbanging inner city thug who voted for Obama for nothing more than his skin tone and promises of “dat free shit” ?[/quote]
Of course I can. The former is trying to elect someone overtly skeptical of Article 5 of the NAT, and is therefore raising the likelihood of geopolitical catastrophe above my current threshold of tolerance; the latter did not. That’s one example. There are hundreds more, none of them having anything to do with politics so much as basic, binary reality.
[Quote]
We can examine the dropout rates among minorities who voted for Obama and their HS dropout rates if you like, it would probably mirror or be worse than those stupid crackers who plan to vote for Trump. [/quote]
This wasn’t some subset of Trump voters. These were the data most predictive of Trump support at the county level – anywhere, nationwide. You can take a look at a nationwide analysis of 08 or 12 voting trends and see whether a comparable story is told in aggregate about any candidate involved in those elections.
[Quote]
Our principles have been stripped already, tell me the last Conservative speaker to lecture at a university who wasn’t chased out of the auditorium nude.[/quote]
I’m a free-marketplace-of-ideas zealot, but if you think that students whining about or protesting or boycotting campus speakers contravenes some Constitutional principle, you have it literally and exactly backward.
Good thing that, statistically, none of this is ever going to happen to you or anyone you know.
Don’t get me wrong: I want a POTUS who is intelligent and tough on terror (i.e., not Trump). But there is a word for the exaggeration of risks and threats and fears beyond their objective dimensions: cowardice. We have spent a lot of time on Trumpism as a vehicle for the delusions of the stupid, but it is just as clearly a vehicle for the cruel cravenness of the fearful.
I feel the need here to clarify that I have been following your posts on Trump from the beginning and understand that you, Max, are not counted among the Trumpite base I’m referring to above.
I’ll respond to a counter if I can, but I’m going to be busy for a while.
In some retarded hypothetic…
Ya, lol, I literally said this like a week ago. I believe I called it the ultimate PWI circle jerk or something to that affect.
If there’s even 1 genuine HRC supporter here I’d be surprised.
Bis and I are probably as close as you can get, and my support for her is almost entirely opposition to Trump as a material threat to my wonderful life in the affluent, relatively free, relatively spectacular west.
In other words, I consider her the earthworm stew I’ll have to choke down if I’m going to stave off Trumpite pellagra (and perhaps death).
This is what I figured. By genuine supporter, I meant someone that actually believes in her policy positions and merit.
There are genuine Bernie, Trump, Rubio, and even Cruz supporters on here, but I don’t think there are any genuine Clinton supporters.
S.L.A.V.E.R.Y. Did you really have to ask that question, in this country?
This fuckin guy
DISCLAIMER HILLARY IS A PIECE OF SHIT