I’ve been worrying about it for over a month now, but all this trumping it up suggests to me he’s trying to inflate what he’s got. He described it as “amusing” a month or so back, whatever that means.
Worst case scenario, his GRU handlers have been leaking him real shit (the DNC emails) in order to make the whole operation credible, and now they’re going to drop something fabricated into the mix. It wouldn’t matter whether or not it was falsifiable. This paranoid political climate (see this very post as an example) offers the ideal conditions for such chicanery. All you need is to tick up the doubt.
The problem with any “revelation” is that Clinton’s Campaign can ill-afford to take even a moderate hit. (She is not burning up these Battleground States).
In terms of Trump; it isn’t that he can “take” a hit; ( because he has proven to be as thin-skinned as it comes).
It just that his tirades and meltdowns tend to not affect his numbers much…which has been the big story of this campaign.
[quote=“smh_23, post:3066, topic:218984”]
…It wouldn’t matter whether or not it was falsifiable. This paranoid political climate (see this very post as an example) offers the ideal conditions for such chicanery…[/quote]
[quote=“MaximusB, post:3065, topic:218984, full:true”]
…Wikileaks announcement is on for tomorrow and being moved to Berlin for safety reasons…[/quote]
Big difference this time around, Obama was bought and paid for before he became president. Trump hasn’t taken anywhere near the money any candidates in the past have taken from big money interests groups.
Trump is an unprecedented candidate that has the potential to get something done.
I’m going to stress the word “allegedly” when I say this, but ALLEGEDLY one of the reports from Wikileaks says that back in 2010, Hillary suggested using non-legal methods for handling Assange in the form of using drone attacks.
Probably because some of these papers are buying into the “3rd party is throwing your vote away” position, which I disagree with. But the fact that 4 papers are endorsing Johnson says that a significantly larger than normal chunk of papers are NOT doing that.
Indirectly he has taken money from everyone in the USA who did pay taxes by not paying them himself and still enjoying the security of this country. Oh yeah it’s only being ‘‘smart’’. You want someone who doesn’t care about funding his country to be the president of it. He also says he wants to rebuild your country and the military, just not with his money I guess. There is no hope for this country if people are going to vote for him after this.
In my eyes he has completely discredited himself to be the president with this and not with any of the other dumb things. For the record I am for banning muslims out of the west and for strong borders, but the rest with him is just too bad.
Have you already forgot that your kind did everything to oppose and block everything he tried to do during those years? The ones with locked minds who don’t believe in progress.
You know he’s losing massive amounts of money by running for president right?
He’s lost a ton money by not working he otherwise would have made had he not run. Also due to the controversial nature of his stances all his hotels are down in bookings. This presidential run has nothing to do with him making more money