I agree entirely on things falling apart once you need to define the platform. The problem is that politics is not a one dimensional spectrum with left and right on opposite ends. Every issue is its own dimension and parties consist of people that agree on lots of issues. A social conservative that is fiscally liberal and a fiscal conservative that is socially liberal might both identify as moderates as they agree with each party on some issues. But they agree with each other on nothing.
Agreed. I generally like the idea, but even as it is not angry in tone, it is defined by what it’s against rather than what it’s for. Movements like this don’t last until they can cohere into a platform of affirmative ideas.
I was talking to a fellow in Belfast from the North of England who said he made his mind up to leave the moment Obama said the UK would be at the “back of the queue.” Once he said that, tens of thousands of English middle fingers were erected in unison and pointed towards the CIC.
That doesn’t surprise me, when Obama went into scold mode, it practically sealed the deal. Who wants to be told what to do by someone thousands of miles away ?
So, Gary Johnson can’t name a single foreign leader, lol. Not that I was ever a big Johnson fan, but he seemed to be the least shitty of the bunch. I let the Aleppo thing slide but now …
I’m starting to consider sitting this election out.