That is what I was thinking. The guy is bragging.
He is polling support from over 17% of the black vote, with them pushing the Trump is a racist lie. I’m both shocked and happy
It’s been a while since we have outright eugenics supporters here in PWI. Over the years, we’ve had some transient Stormfronters (Nominal Prospect, etc.) who trafficked in disgusting race theory and the need to grow one race and limit others, but I thought they had gone the way of the dodo.
Well, clearly not. We definitely have some dodos.
2 Likes
No, he isn’t- he’s attacking the credibility of the “research” and the position by pointing out the bias. These creeps aren’t disinterested social scientists going where the data lead.
2 Likes
Having strong borders / wanting to lower immigration levels is disgusting and if you disagree you’re a white supremist who wants to put forth a eugenics program
1 Like
That is actually shocking. But, I really wonder where it will all wash out on election day. Do you think he will actually receive over 10% of the black vote? By the way if he got that much that would be enough.
Sorry what you said is not true. He attacked the researcher not the research. The researcher can be a total shit and his research is still correct. Where is the research wrong?
Not ten posts ago you were decrying the debasement of the meaning and point of eugenics.
1 Like
The first article he cited explains reasons how CIS got their facts wrong. Read the actual article before opining on it.
1 Like
If he is polling 17% yes 10% will be easy. His trend is up
I will read that. Nothing else has any relevance and is a waste of time
Any tie to immigration and eugenics is purely stupid
I actually enjoy it, it’s fun having a few dodo’s around for the sake of diversity.
They’re protected species right?..
That’s correct, last I recall they passed some measure called the “1st Ammendment” protecting their survival.
1 Like
You still miss the point, Zeb. I’ll admit, for the first time this election cycle, Trump may indeed have a chance. I still think Hillary will win by a landslide, but he has a chance.
Does it really make a difference? And if so, is he really better?
In the last week, you have Trump promoting paid maternity leave and substantial rumors that he will nominate Peter Thiel for USSC. In what way is Trump going to advance a single conservative cause?
The only sure thing with Trump is that he is going to do whatever his ego will allow and make the most money in the process.
With Clinton, you get a liberal democrat that Republicans will openly oppose. With Trump you get a liberal democrat that Republicans will support. What’s better for the county?
I’ll say it for the umpteenth time, confirm Merrick Garland ASAP. Hand this over to Hillary and let’s take landslide elections in 2018 and 2020.
1 Like
Get a room you two…
Because we have a generation of people who don’t want freedom. They want to be told what to do, how to do it, and when to do it. They don’t want to have to earn a living and make tough decisions. They need their decisions made for them. When they get pregnant they can’t put in forethought and act accordingly. It’s your damn kid, you pay for it. Why should anyone be forced to pay for another persons pregnancy?
Would you be more upset that a giant federal entitlement got passed, or that you didn’t get your benefit?