The 'Donalds' Running Mate?

[ZEB]

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]MaximusB wrote:
I think Trump is going to eat everyone’s lunch in the first debate.[/quote]

I guess that depends on your definition of “eating everyone’s lunch”

Will he be loud, offensive and interrupt other candidates? Absolutely!

Will he demonstrate more knowledge on world affairs than the other candidates. Absolutely not!

So…I guess it depends on what type of person people want in the Oval office. [/quote]
no one knows , you have to remember when Schwarzenegger won Cali or Ventura won Minn. I think the American people are fed up with Establishment Candidates [/quote]

They’ve always been fed up with establishment candidates. Yet, every four years we elect an establishment candidate. Odd how that works…
[/quote]

Ron Paul was marginalized by the media , I think we have learned something since then . Social media has to be 2 or 3 time what it was in 2008[/quote]

Oh Pitt…Ron Paul was a loser from day one. An old man with zero charisma is not going to win the White House. Social media could be 100 times what it was in 2008 someone like Ron Paul will never win…ever. Have you learned nothing from me over the years?

[/quote]

Ron Paul would have won if not for an establishment media The Des Moines Register - Des Moines, Iowa, News and Sports
[/quote]

LOL…you’re a good guy Pitt. But, your political read on Ron Paul is upside down.

The media dumped on one of your favorite Presidents when he was only a candidate. They hated him because he was so conservative. Ronald Reagan won anyway because he was something Ron Paul never was…a good candidate!

[pittbulll]

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]MaximusB wrote:
I think Trump is going to eat everyone’s lunch in the first debate.[/quote]

I guess that depends on your definition of “eating everyone’s lunch”

Will he be loud, offensive and interrupt other candidates? Absolutely!

Will he demonstrate more knowledge on world affairs than the other candidates. Absolutely not!

So…I guess it depends on what type of person people want in the Oval office. [/quote]
no one knows , you have to remember when Schwarzenegger won Cali or Ventura won Minn. I think the American people are fed up with Establishment Candidates [/quote]

They’ve always been fed up with establishment candidates. Yet, every four years we elect an establishment candidate. Odd how that works…
[/quote]

Ron Paul was marginalized by the media , I think we have learned something since then . Social media has to be 2 or 3 time what it was in 2008[/quote]

Oh Pitt…Ron Paul was a loser from day one. An old man with zero charisma is not going to win the White House. Social media could be 100 times what it was in 2008 someone like Ron Paul will never win…ever. Have you learned nothing from me over the years?

[/quote]

Ron Paul would have won if not for an establishment media The Des Moines Register - Des Moines, Iowa, News and Sports
[/quote]

LOL…you’re a good guy Pitt. But, your political read on Ron Paul is upside down.

The media dumped on one of your favorite Presidents when he was only a candidate. They hated him because he was so conservative. Ronald Reagan won anyway because he was something Ron Paul never was…a good candidate!
[/quote]

Reagan won because the American voter is not very bright , all he had to do was “ACT” like a President and he was elected . The Media dumps on every President but they ignored - marginalized - discounted - controlled the thought processes of the American voter . I contend they won’t get away with it again

[pittbulll]

http://toprightnews.com/video-uncovered-trump-interview-from-over-25-years-ago-will-shock-a-lot-of-people/

Part of me suspects Trump is “ACTING” like what he thinks all the frothing at the mouth Republicans want . But if he talked like he did on this video , I would vote for him

[ZEB]

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]MaximusB wrote:
I think Trump is going to eat everyone’s lunch in the first debate.[/quote]

I guess that depends on your definition of “eating everyone’s lunch”

Will he be loud, offensive and interrupt other candidates? Absolutely!

Will he demonstrate more knowledge on world affairs than the other candidates. Absolutely not!

So…I guess it depends on what type of person people want in the Oval office. [/quote]
no one knows , you have to remember when Schwarzenegger won Cali or Ventura won Minn. I think the American people are fed up with Establishment Candidates [/quote]

They’ve always been fed up with establishment candidates. Yet, every four years we elect an establishment candidate. Odd how that works…
[/quote]

Ron Paul was marginalized by the media , I think we have learned something since then . Social media has to be 2 or 3 time what it was in 2008[/quote]

Oh Pitt…Ron Paul was a loser from day one. An old man with zero charisma is not going to win the White House. Social media could be 100 times what it was in 2008 someone like Ron Paul will never win…ever. Have you learned nothing from me over the years?

[/quote]

Ron Paul would have won if not for an establishment media The Des Moines Register - Des Moines, Iowa, News and Sports
[/quote]

LOL…you’re a good guy Pitt. But, your political read on Ron Paul is upside down.

The media dumped on one of your favorite Presidents when he was only a candidate. They hated him because he was so conservative. Ronald Reagan won anyway because he was something Ron Paul never was…a good candidate!
[/quote]

Reagan won because the American voter is not very bright , all he had to do was “ACT” like a President and he was elected . The Media dumps on every President but they ignored - marginalized - discounted - controlled the thought processes of the American voter . I contend they won’t get away with it again

[/quote]

The media is always tougher on republicans than on democrats that is a fact! And they will indeed get away with attacking whomever they want whenever they want. Social media doesn’t mean squat when it comes to that.

By the way if Regan was elected because the electorate is “not very bright” do you think they became smarter over the years when they elected obamawitz?

[pittbulll]

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]MaximusB wrote:
I think Trump is going to eat everyone’s lunch in the first debate.[/quote]

I guess that depends on your definition of “eating everyone’s lunch”

Will he be loud, offensive and interrupt other candidates? Absolutely!

Will he demonstrate more knowledge on world affairs than the other candidates. Absolutely not!

So…I guess it depends on what type of person people want in the Oval office. [/quote]
no one knows , you have to remember when Schwarzenegger won Cali or Ventura won Minn. I think the American people are fed up with Establishment Candidates [/quote]

They’ve always been fed up with establishment candidates. Yet, every four years we elect an establishment candidate. Odd how that works…
[/quote]

Ron Paul was marginalized by the media , I think we have learned something since then . Social media has to be 2 or 3 time what it was in 2008[/quote]

Oh Pitt…Ron Paul was a loser from day one. An old man with zero charisma is not going to win the White House. Social media could be 100 times what it was in 2008 someone like Ron Paul will never win…ever. Have you learned nothing from me over the years?

[/quote]

Ron Paul would have won if not for an establishment media The Des Moines Register - Des Moines, Iowa, News and Sports
[/quote]

LOL…you’re a good guy Pitt. But, your political read on Ron Paul is upside down.

The media dumped on one of your favorite Presidents when he was only a candidate. They hated him because he was so conservative. Ronald Reagan won anyway because he was something Ron Paul never was…a good candidate!
[/quote]

Reagan won because the American voter is not very bright , all he had to do was “ACT” like a President and he was elected . The Media dumps on every President but they ignored - marginalized - discounted - controlled the thought processes of the American voter . I contend they won’t get away with it again

[/quote]

The media is always tougher on republicans than on democrats that is a fact! And they will indeed get away with attacking whomever they want whenever they want. Social media doesn’t mean squat when it comes to that.

By the way if Regan was elected because the electorate is “not very bright” do you think they became smarter over the years when they elected obamawitz?
[/quote]

may be to some degree did the public get smarter , I think many realize the mistake it was to listen to establishment media , as far as Bam being as bad as you or this board think this video is for you - YouTube

[ZEB]

Ha ha funny video Pitt. But I never blamed Obama for me tripping on the stairway.

However I do blame Obama for the following.

Take a look at the Obama record. Pitt if you can tell me why Obama has been a good President I’d love to hear it.

http://www.myopinions-carl.com/2010/07/obama-failures-listed.html

[pittbulll]

[quote]ZEB wrote:
Ha ha funny video Pitt. But I never blamed Obama for me tripping on the stairway.

However I do blame Obama for the following.

Take a look at the Obama record. Pitt if you can tell me why Obama has been a good President I’d love to hear it.

http://www.myopinions-carl.com/2010/07/obama-failures-listed.html[/quote]

You put a list of 13 or more , with out researching who the girl is , I never heard of her, The world is not static , it changes constantly, the majority of your complaints , there would be nothing he could do nor in some cases would I want him to do anything. To truly discuss that you would need to make each point a thread

[ZEB]

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:
Ha ha funny video Pitt. But I never blamed Obama for me tripping on the stairway.

However I do blame Obama for the following.

Take a look at the Obama record. Pitt if you can tell me why Obama has been a good President I’d love to hear it.

http://www.myopinions-carl.com/2010/07/obama-failures-listed.html[/quote]

You put a list of 13 or more , with out researching who the girl is , I never heard of her, The world is not static , it changes constantly, the majority of your complaints , there would be nothing he could do nor in some cases would I want him to do anything. To truly discuss that you would need to make each point a thread
[/quote]

This isn’t rocket science Pitt. I put up a list of 80 things that Obama did wrong.

You know, the Iran Nuclear deal, ignoring the death of a woman killed by an illegal alien, lying about Obama care…and of course 77 more.

You can either refute each one, or put up a list of 80 things that he’s done correctly. You can start with the fact that he had Osama Bin Laden killed. I think that was a really good move. But other than that I’ll be darned if I can think of even one other thing he has done correctly in 6 1/2 years. But being the avid believer that you are I’m sure that you can find 79 other things that he’s done right.

I’m waiting.

Zeb

[MaximusB]

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:
Ha ha funny video Pitt. But I never blamed Obama for me tripping on the stairway.

However I do blame Obama for the following.

Take a look at the Obama record. Pitt if you can tell me why Obama has been a good President I’d love to hear it.

http://www.myopinions-carl.com/2010/07/obama-failures-listed.html[/quote]

You put a list of 13 or more , with out researching who the girl is , I never heard of her, The world is not static , it changes constantly, the majority of your complaints , there would be nothing he could do nor in some cases would I want him to do anything. To truly discuss that you would need to make each point a thread
[/quote]

This isn’t rocket science Pitt. I put up a list of 80 things that Obama did wrong.

You know, the Iran Nuclear deal, ignoring the death of a woman killed by an illegal alien, lying about Obama care…and of course 77 more.

You can either refute each one, or put up a list of 80 things that he’s done correctly. You can start with the fact that he had Osama Bin Laden killed. I think that was a really good move. But other than that I’ll be darned if I can think of even one other thing he has done correctly in 6 1/2 years. But being the avid believer that you are I’m sure that you can find 79 other things that he’s done right.

I’m waiting.

Zeb[/quote]

It’s actually worse than Obama being wrong on so many things, Conservatives pointed out he would be wrong and they were labeled racists.

Look at Obamacare, and the promise of your plan not going up one dime. He was right, it didn’t go up one dime, my plan went up a whole bunch of dimes.

Al Qaeda is on the run ? Child please !