[quote]Lorisco wrote:
JustTheFacts wrote:
People seem to forget that the Bush’s are every bit, (and then some) the political dynasty the Kennedy’s were – yet ironically, they don’t seem to die of “unnatural” causes at anywhere near the same rate for some reason.
Maybe it is because they don’t get liquored up, do some drugs, and then try and fly a plane over the ocean.
[/quote]
[quote]JustTheFacts wrote:
Hack Wilson wrote:
Oh. This should be GOOD! Tell us the real story? The Bush family helped plan the assassinations so they could win the ‘best political dynasty’ title?
I’m just stating a fact.
But if you really need a Bush conspiracy theory – imagine the coincidence of Neil Bush having dinner plans with John W. Hinckley Jr’s brother the day he tries to assassinate Reagan.
Bush Son Had Dinner Plans With Hinckley Brother Before Shooting
The Associated Press
March 31, 1981
The family of the man charged with trying to assassinate President Reagan is acquainted with the family of Vice President George Bush and had made large contributions to his political campaign, the Houston Post reported today… http://www.voxfux.com/features/hinckley_bush_connection.html
Small world, huh…
[/quote]
HA. HA! Uh…‘tme’? What say you now? You know the thing about any ‘reasonably intelligent’ person?
[quote]JustTheFacts wrote:
Lorisco wrote:
JustTheFacts wrote:
People seem to forget that the Bush’s are every bit, (and then some) the political dynasty the Kennedy’s were – yet ironically, they don’t seem to die of “unnatural” causes at anywhere near the same rate for some reason.
Maybe it is because they don’t get liquored up, do some drugs, and then try and fly a plane over the ocean.
Thats right, W doesn’t fly (anymore)
[/quote]
Yeh, too bad John John wasn’t smart enough to take that same advice. He must have been listening to Uncle Ted!
[quote]JustTheFacts wrote:
Lorisco wrote:
The Kennedy’s are White trailer trash people who just happen to have money. And honest assessment of Kennedy family history will reveal just how dysfunctional and idiotic most of them are. So it doesn’t surprise me that Teddy was trying to subvert the US. But since he is now a full-blown alcoholic, it is just a matter of time until he dies from liver failure.
Nice. I wonder how you might turn out after seeing your two older brothers assassinated with bullets to the head? (over and over and over again, btw)
People seem to forget that the Bush’s are every bit, (and then some) the political dynasty the Kennedy’s were – yet ironically, they don’t seem to die of “unnatural” causes at anywhere near the same rate for some reason. [/quote]
That IS an excellent point. And why has the Senator never been assassinated? Seems like knocking off Kennedy brothers was a passion for some.
Was John Kennedy killed by orders of Sam Giancana? That’s what I’ve heard. Sam was whacked by the CIA, according to legend.
[quote]JustTheFacts wrote:
Hack Wilson wrote:
Oh. This should be GOOD! Tell us the real story? The Bush family helped plan the assassinations so they could win the ‘best political dynasty’ title?
I’m just stating a fact.
But if you really need a Bush conspiracy theory – imagine the coincidence of Neil Bush having dinner plans with John W. Hinckley Jr’s brother the day he tries to assassinate Reagan.
Bush Son Had Dinner Plans With Hinckley Brother Before Shooting
The Associated Press
March 31, 1981
The family of the man charged with trying to assassinate President Reagan is acquainted with the family of Vice President George Bush and had made large contributions to his political campaign, the Houston Post reported today… http://www.voxfux.com/features/hinckley_bush_connection.html
Small world, huh…
[/quote]
An interesting quote from the website:
“Then, Ronald Reagan was invited to New York to go see Rockefeller. When he saw Rockefeller, he was
told, ‘If you do not take my head of the Trilateral Commission’”
(remember, the Council on Foreign Relations, George Bush) “‘as
your running mate, the only way you’ll see the inside of the
White House is as a tourist.’”
Was John Kennedy killed by orders of Sam Giancana? That’s what I’ve heard. Sam was whacked by the CIA, according to legend.
That is an interesting question! I don’t think any of us will ever know all the facts about any of this stuff. You can’t trust the media. You can’t trust the government. I for one do NOT trust the Kennedy’s or any left wingnut self proclaimed patriots. Although I was a young boy at the time. I also heard that Bobby Kennedy was going after the same people who helped get him elected, ie. the Mob, Mafia whatever you want to call it. I don’t think we’ll every know. A lot of people liked to (and still do) knock Reagan. I for one thought his “We win they lose” attitude was right on the money. A lot of people like to knock Bush. However he is our twice elected President. When we look back at Bush in years to come will we remember him for all the rhetoric supplied by the “Drive-by Media” or will we remember a man who shortly after entering office was handed 911?
[quote]UtahLama wrote:
Wreckless wrote:
pat36 wrote:
Wreckless wrote:
Hack Wilson wrote:
Wreckless wrote:
I have a question Hack: did the traitor shuttle back and forth between the US and the evil empire illegally?
Or did he just board a plane using his own name?
Wait! Since these visits were out in the open then it’s OKAY to discuss tactics for discrediting the President with your enemies?
So you’re just as distressed with the Reagan camp negotiating with Iran to hold on to the hostages until after the elections then, are you?
Perhaps we could name an aircraft carrier after Teddy Kennedy also?
Oh belgium is going to build an aircraft carrier named the “Ted Kennedy”? Because “we” does not include you, and vice versa.
No. And we didn’t build one and name it after some stupid actor either.
That’s right Wreck throw flailing insults at our now deceased former President.
Classy.
Remove the sand from your vagina and argue like a man. Insulting dead presidents from another country takes big balls, right?.. tough guy.
You don’t see us dragging up and insulting your former leaders do you?
Oh that’s right because you are completely irrelevant.
[quote]Lorisco wrote:
The Bush’s are White trailer trash people who just happen to have money. And honest assessment of Bush family history will reveal just how dysfunctional and idiotic most of them are. So it doesn’t surprise me that GW was trying to subvert the US. But since he is now a full-blown alcoholic, it is just a matter of time until he dies from liver failure.
The best, BY FAR, about the JFK assassination is “Final Judgement: The Missing Link in the JFK Assassination Conspiracy” by Michael Piper. In a nutshell, the book explains how JFK was opposed to israel obtaining nukes and how this bitter, secret debate between him and Ben-Gurion led to a joint Mossad/CIA assassination of him.
Very well documented and frankly will give you chills as he traces, step by step, the key players and their roles in this.
[quote]Wreckless wrote:
pat36 wrote:
Wreckless wrote:
No. And we didn’t build one and name it after some stupid actor either.
You won’t build one period because you can’t.
We’re sucure enough in our manhoud not to strive for global dominance.[/quote]
If someone is not the world’s policeman, the world goes unpoliced. Is that what you want? Belgium would cease to exist in a New York minute and you know it.
Your country is surrounded on all sides by larger (excepting Holland) and, for now, peaceful countries. Were they always peaceful? Do they always respect your neutrality, your desire to be left alone? Yeah, right.
Maybe I’ll take back what I said in the Dr. King thread.
[quote]Hack Wilson wrote:
We hear so often from folks on the right that liberal democrats are un-American and work to subvert the USA by enabling our enemies. The left laughs at this, saying they are just as patriotic as those on the right. They love this county! They support the troops! How dare you!?!?!
Yeah, right. Recently released Soviet files reveal that one of the liberal left’s famed leaders, Edward (Teddy) Kennedy visited the USSR on many occasions during the later years of the Cold War. He sent an ‘envoy’ to meet with the Soviets on still more occasions. Why? What was the substance of these meetings?
Now we know: Kennedy was actively working to sabotage Reagan’s efforts in the Cold War. He instructed the Russians in how to be more effective in waging the war of ideas with the US. He gave free tips to the Communists on how to effectively manipulate public opinion in the US (something our current enemies - the terrorists - have not come to COUNT on from the democrats) to more favor the Soviet viewpoint. He lamented that the Russians could not deal directly with military leaders, as opposed to having to go through that pesky President of United States guy (Reagan).
Read the link, folks. This is stuff that has gotten people shot for treason and sedition.
[quote]Wreckless wrote:
We’re sucure enough in our manhoud not to strive for global dominance.[/quote]
What is a “manhoud”.
No you don’t empower yourselves with a decent military because in case of emergency you will call the U.S. or the U.K. and we will help your crass ungrateful ass.
[quote]pat36 wrote:
Wreckless wrote:
We’re sucure enough in our manhoud not to strive for global dominance.
What is a “manhoud”.
No you don’t empower yourselves with a decent military because in case of emergency you will call the U.S. or the U.K. and we will help your crass ungrateful ass.[/quote]
Although I agree that we saved Europe in WWII, I think it’s this kind of arrogant attitude that makes the world fuckin hate us.
Remember, they helped us once too, and our fates are intertwined. One day, we may need help from them too.
[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
pat36 wrote:
Wreckless wrote:
We’re sucure enough in our manhoud not to strive for global dominance.
What is a “manhoud”.
No you don’t empower yourselves with a decent military because in case of emergency you will call the U.S. or the U.K. and we will help your crass ungrateful ass.
Although I agree that we saved Europe in WWII, I think it’s this kind of arrogant attitude that makes the world fuckin hate us.
Remember, they helped us once too, and our fates are intertwined. One day, we may need help from them too.[/quote]
If you mean they as in Europe then yes “they” helped us. I don’t recall belgium doing shit for us ever though. I could be wrong, but other than sell diamonds to Tom Shane and DeBeers, I do not recall Belgium doing anybody any favors.
I do not believe all of Europe depends on the U.S. and it allies for it’s security, but some countries do.
Some people think they have nothing to fear, that nobody will attack them because they haven’t done anything wrong to anybody. This particular Belgian, dickless, thinks that nobody will ever attack Belgium after what have they done to anybody? The Danes are scared of attack and all they had was a lousy cartoon; how much more fun would it be to do major damage to the European economy and hit Antwerp? The 2nd largest port in Europe seems like a viable target. After all the European Union is at least as evil as the U.S., or are they angels not trying to impose thier will on countries who do not want them to?
[quote]Wreckless wrote:
Lorisco wrote:
The Bush’s are White trailer trash people who just happen to have money. And honest assessment of Bush family history will reveal just how dysfunctional and idiotic most of them are. So it doesn’t surprise me that GW was trying to subvert the US. But since he is now a full-blown alcoholic, it is just a matter of time until he dies from liver failure.
I agree ! ! ! [/quote]
Funny!
You don’t think people have the brains to look up what I really wrote?
Bush is not perfect, but the family is not held up as icons like the Kennedy’s. They are held up as such a great virtuous family when almost all of them have done something despicable. Yet the press and Dem’s continue to want to kiss their butts.