When I speak of murder I already take this into account. I’m talking about the unsolved, unconvinced murders on the streets of the inner cities. You support those?
No, it is obfuscation and rationalization unless you have any sort of argument to separate taxation from theft. I’ve repeatedly invited you to do this and you’ve refused.
A cop shoots a guy “just because.” A killing, and also a murder. A cop shoots a guy approaching a lady with a knife, screaming “I’ll cut you up bitch.” That’s a killing
Taxation and theft are both confiscation. But only theft is theft.
There is a very clear concise definition of murder that excludes things like self defense for which there is well reasoned intelligent logic for. I’m not sure who you are arguing against.
Murder, the evil immoral bad kind we both agree on, is largely allowed by the current system. If you support the current system why are you not responsible for those murders?
Because the government is a social good endowed with the rightful authority to confiscate in order to carry out its obligations and responsibilities to its citizens.
That is a justification for doing it, not a logical argument for the distention between taxation and theft. You are saying that it’s necessary, not that it isn’t theft.
But if you go and do some basic reading on morality and law, you will find well reasoned logic behind the distinction. You don’t have that for taxation.