They would have been, in a free market. Before 1913 there was no private banking cartel to save them from bad investments by printing the sovereign currency of the US. Congress created the Fed to try and appease citizens who were scared of bank failures (some of them actually understood what they were doing).
In a free market banks fail like any other business.
You want experimental unproven treatments played for at taxpayer expense?
Read this sloooooooooooowly
You tell me I am making a mistake by quoting “corporate media” and then in the very next sentence quote “corporate media”.
This is ridiculous even for you.
The problem with this and every Zep thread is that he start with the assumption that corporations are evil and government is good. Setting aside this child like view of how the world actually works in real life, it’s utter non-sense on its face.
But banks don’t want competition, they want socialism for themselves and pull-up your bootstraps mentality for everyone else. The money and power allows them to behave like a cartel.
When hundreds of thousands of people over the last decade report positive benefits is it just anecdotal? No, it’s proof. Imagine if the same criteria were held for medicinal cannabis? Millions would be suffering and even dying while they wait for science to figure it out. So fuck off with your bullshit.
(Entry 1 of 3)
1a : the cogency of evidence that compels acceptance by the mind of a truth or a fact
compels acceptance. Meaning there can be no other conclusion. Without proper testing a treatment modality isn’t “prooved”.
Anecdotal stories… why do I even bother. You know the drill.
Results are PROOF! Far better than any clinical trial. So I guess the millions of Americans taking medicinal cannabis to relieve their symptoms are just imaging the benefits?
Like with vaccines?
Nope! They are definitely getting stoned.
Some of that medical shit is hitting up to 24.5% THC.
And hell the wax is low 80s on a normal day. People acting like it’s not about getting stoned most of the time. Pshhhh
What? No big takeoff of Charlotte’s Web (aka Hippy Disappointment)?
Boy is my face red!
Bro, he just has questions that need to be answered!!!
Peter Popov has received thousands of testimonials, and he has a 30+ year track record. Based on your criteria, Popov is a PROVEN healer. Plus it’s only a couple hundred to get your miracle, “effective” (based on YOUR criteria) and cost-efficient!
Do you think this is done for profit or protection?
Both. Vaccines in and of themselves aren’t very profitable, so it’s done for protection.
That being said, people who don’t die of polio or other such vaccine friendly diseases typically spend more money on other healthcare throughout the rest of their lives.
Cuz, ya know, dead people can’t spend money
The amount of THC is not proof that people are using it to get stoned. Even if that were true, which it isn’t, is that justification from keeping itfrom those it helps?
Sure it is. THC free equivalents exist en masse and are readily available.
Plus I smoke with a lot of them. They told me man. To mah face
Edit: obv ‘lot’ is relative
Once again you are too dumb to distinguish the differences pointed out In Your Own Posted Sources.
Dravets syndrome, which is extremely rare, is treated with a non psychoactive extract- CBD.
Also, nobody is saying that people shouldn’t get stoned.
We’re saying that the difference between the people with treatable conditions vs. the people using is tremendous, and that a vast majority is for getting stoned.
You just dumb too hard to get good big points. And don’t read your own sources. Which goes back to point one. Lost ya there, didn’t I?
Like a ninja with wordy-words!
It’s gonna be just hilarious when he dismisses your anecdotal evidence.
“So those hundreds of thousands of people a year getting high are lying?!”
No it isn’t. Smoking is only 1 way to partake in cannabis medication and I would guess not the main reason.