[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]NickViar wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]NickViar wrote:
Gotcha. I thought you were trying to say that you, pittbulll, have the right to search and seize what you want.
Assault & battery is illegal, but competitive fighters are able to do it legally. How is that? [/quote]
if I understand you willful consent is the point
[/quote]
You are taking a point of 2 people that have a gain in the transaction and equating it to some one complying for fear of loss
Thank you. That IS the point. An employee either consents to the terms of his employer or leaves that employer.[/quote]
You are taking a point of 2 people that have a gain in the transaction and equating it to some one complying for fear of loss
[/quote]
Do not both employee and employer benefit from their relationship?
A fighter(at least a professional, which I think is what you were talking about in your response) who doesn’t agree to be legally assaulted and battered(or who weighs in at 180 pounds when he is supposed to be 140) has just as much to lose as an employee who doesn’t agree to an “unreasonable” search of his urine.
Neither will actually lose anything(unless it’s written in his contract that he will do such and such or pay such and such in return). A job can’t be viewed as having some intrinsic value. A job is merely performing a task in return for something(usually money).