Your source is suspect. Probably funded by the healthcare industry. So you may have found 1 out of how many? And this is what you hang your argument on?
What a bunch of pure 100% grade A bullshit!
“the inequality gap”
You know what closes the inequality gap Zepster?
Hard work from the person who is feeling not quite equal to his successful neighbor.
Hillary losing even one primary to the nutty Bernie Sanders, who by the way never held down a real job in his life, is proof positive that the electorate does not want Hillary.
Go Bernie!!
LOL
Spoken like someone who has been victimized by the corporate propaganda system.
Like the hard work the “banksters” did defrauding the public?
The corporate democrats want Hillary as they are afraid of Bernie. In much the same way the establishment Republicans don’t want Trump. The GOP is primarily a white male party and as the population of white people decreases in relation to the minorities it is a dying party. Thank God. Now if we can just get rid of the corporate Democrats this nation can move forward he4lping the majority of it’s population instead of the few.
“Your source is suspect” here’s a wikipedia page…
Lolololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololoololololol.
Wikipedia vs. The World Bank. Just lol. Fucking lol. You can have the last word, I’m out.
So you are saying that everyone who works hard and prospers in America is somehow corrupt? Do you want to change that statement? There are many who were born into poverty and became very successful. Did you know that most millionaires today were not born with wealth but made it on their own?
Think about it Zep
Doesn’t mean the banksters didn’t defraud the public and need to be held accountable. Do you want to change your statement because some people made their wealth honorably then the banksters did as well?
But without banks funding new businesses where would economic growth come from?
The guilty should be punished when found they are guilty. If they lent to new business owners it is beside the point. Just because they may have lent to business owners, doesn’t put them beyond the reach of the law. But donate enough to a campaign and that is exactly what you get. Is it just a coincidence that none of the banksters were even brought for prosecution but donated more to the Obama campaign then any other candidate in history?
What laws were broken?
Maybe we should stop talking about R’s and D’s, it’s more about the bribed vs the not bribed.
