I’m not quite sure how, exactly…but if you say so, I’ll roll with it!
Full circle. Trump calls Washington Post fake news shortly after touting article from Washington Post. Unreal.
And still silence from Raj on the relationship between Trump and Alex Jones.
It’s official fake news is news that casts Trump in a negative light. He will cite the NYT and Post if they have a positive article on him.
He’s still trying to wrap his head around Trump confirming Russia meddled in the election. Trump should know better than to divide by zero with his base.
1 Like
Some fiction to indulge your Russia Trump fantasies is going to be aired by FNN
Enjoy!
Do you believe Russia tried to meddle with our election?
Evidence for that claim is weak.
Not what I asked. I’m asking if you personally believe Russia tried to meddle in our election, with all the evidence you’ve seen/heard/inferred/etc to date.
It’s possible but until real evidence has been presented to us, I do not believe it
He’s working off intelligence reports. I don’t believe intelligence reports in isolation is adequate evidence based on their poor track record
Follow up question. What type of evidence would be necessary for you to believe Russia meddled in our election. Is there anything that would convince you short of a statement from Putin admitting it?
A trail of what they found and why they’re sure it could only have come from Russia.
Do you have the technical expertise to understand the raw evidence? Or would you be forced to rely on the analysis presented by people that do?
I don’t need it. There are plenty of experts who will break it down
There’s also the fact analysis would be carried out by multiple separate groups.
Right now it’s just IC screaming Russia!
So just to be clear you don’t believe the President, the Senate, our IC and the international IC on this.
But the female genital mutilation article from a website with nothing but anti-Muslim stories only needed to say hey we read a report no one else has for you to believe it.
If you weren’t a recent immigrant who wants to stop immigration and person of color who reads and believes people who despise him I would say this makes no sense. In your case though I see no problem with this.
2 Likes
And several independent cyber security agencies.
2 Likes
Some of those reports from “independent cyber security agencies” on Russia have been debunked.
Such as the experts employed by the VARIOUS intel communities and agencies?
Whelp, we have the NSA, FBI, CIA, England’s IC, Germany’s IC, France’s IC, Norway (iirc), Spain (iirc) and probably a dozen other acronym agencies.
Is your problem that the agencies that looked into this are all govt based? Guess I’m confused how many “multiple” needs to be.
Any chance you know a few? I know they exist I just can’t remember who (and google’s a clusterfuck lately)
We are talking about a government that faked 9/11, Boston bombing, Aurora, Sandy Hook, and many others.
Just cause you ain’t paranoid doesn’t mean they aren’t out to get you
1 Like