Romney = Obama. Finally, Americans Are Waking Up to Ron Paul!
The system doesn’t change and people will continue to claim Paul is going to loose. The best part, who is the one that has more money still? Dr. Paul! Try and tell me Paul wouldn’t bring our country out of debt.
Ron Paul: Run Your Own Life as You See Fit
[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
The fact that people on here claim that Obama is far left just goes to show how well the propaganda machine in the U.S. works. Extraordinary![/quote]
Yeah, we all know that Obama is a right wing conservative. Those lying bastards![/quote]
Yes and we all know what a committed socialist he is as well. His record speaks…[/quote]
If you understood even a little of how American politics works you would know that if a President wants to move either left or right he does so in increments. Some large some not so large. In his first term he passed the biggest government take over and control of individual rights in the history of the country, national health care. This was against the wishes of about 70% of the American people as well. In his second term he will move even further to the left as there will be no electorate to answer to.
Yes, he’s the most liberal President that we’ve ever had. But this would have been well known by the people had the press done their job. But they were busy trying to get Obama elected.
Stop playing the part of clueless Internet poster…You are playing right?
[quote]kneedragger79 wrote:
The Ron Paul “delegate strategy” seems to be working. And he could very well be nominated at the Republican National Convention in Tampa in late summer.[/quote]
LOL! I almost spit up my morning protein shake. No really…you guys don’t get it yet? And after all of those last place finishes?
Absolutely Incredible!
One more time for old time sake:
Ron Paul will NEVER…>EVER be elected President of the United States! Not now and not ever!
Try really hard to live with that reality, life will go a lot easier when you do.
[quote]kneedragger79 wrote:
RonPaul Wins Washington
written by - Chris Miles
The Ron Paul “delegate strategy” seems to be working. And he could very well be nominated at the Republican National Convention in Tampa in late summer.
Wow. Twist.
The Texas libertarian has based his entire 2012 presidential campaign on the ability to win over state delegates - rather than winning the popular vote. To do this, Paul has utilized an extensive grassroots campaign network to influence local officials, who in turn would influence the higher-up officials. Until recently, this strategy had shown only limited results: the ground-level Paul delegates had not been able to immediately influence the wider state delegate situation. Now, though, caucus states like Washington, Minnesota, and Iowa Ã?¢?? each with a complicated system of “bound” and “unbound” delegates - are nominating their delegates to the GOP national convention in Tampa. And the Paul ground game is starting to work, but with some institutional backlash.
Here’s a micro-level example: In Washington over the weekend, Republicans in the 37th Legislative District gathered to vote on their delegates. The meeting saw Ron Paul supporters elect one of their own to chair the process. A Republican Party chairman, though, refused to accept the Paul-supporting chairperson, and ended the meeting, declaring that the meeting was no longer a Republican Party event, but rather a Ron Paul campaign event.
The caucus finished its business outside in the sun, and elected 11 Ron Paul supporters to the state convention, which begins May 31 in Tacoma.
http://www.policymic.com/mobile/article/id/7460
Boom, Ron Paul’s system looks like it is working.
Paul loyalists, of course, still harbor hope for getting their man nominated at the national convention in Tampa in late August. In order to do that, Paul must have a majority of support from at least five state delegations. With states like North Dakota, Minnesota, Maine, and others on track, his supporters could then attempt to nominate him from the floor.
And it’s looking like he’ll get the states he needs to be eligible for a nomination (though, by no means would he be able to beat Mitt Romney’s delegate haul). Even being eligible would be a massive #win for Paul, though, especially as he shops his libertarian ideology and seeks to influence conservative politics on a more philosophical level.
Earlier this week in Iowa and Minnesota, Ron Paul’s covert, submarine delegate strategy paid off. Iowa has 28 total delegates that it can award, and one of those delegates is the state chairman, a Ron Paul supporter. Paul also picked up 13 delegates from the stateÃ?¢??s nomination committee, which decided yesterday to go for Ron Paul. Weeks after the Iowa race was called for Rick Santorum, Paul’s grinding delegate game has paid off, and at the very worst, he will earn half of Iowa’s delegates.
He pulled off the same thing in Minnesota. The state has 40 delegates and Ron Paul has secured at least 20 of them, confirming Paul’s prediction at the time that “when the dust settles, there is a very good chance that we’ll have the maximum number of delegates coming out of Minnesota.”
Ron Paul is very much on track to change the course of this GOP presidential race. [/quote]
One can only hope 
sounds like another campaign
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]kneedragger79 wrote:
The Ron Paul “delegate strategy” seems to be working. And he could very well be nominated at the Republican National Convention in Tampa in late summer.[/quote]
LOL! I almost spit up my morning protein shake. No really…you guys don’t get it yet? And after all of those last place finishes?
Absolutely Incredible!
One more time for old time sake:
Ron Paul will NEVER…>EVER be elected President of the United States! Not now and not ever!
Try really hard to live with that reality, life will go a lot easier when you do.
[/quote]
I do not think you get it Zeb if %20 of the people vote for Paul ,that is what you call a voting block and people cater to voting blocks
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]kneedragger79 wrote:
The Ron Paul “delegate strategy” seems to be working. And he could very well be nominated at the Republican National Convention in Tampa in late summer.[/quote]
LOL! I almost spit up my morning protein shake. No really…you guys don’t get it yet? And after all of those last place finishes?
Absolutely Incredible!
One more time for old time sake:
Ron Paul will NEVER…>EVER be elected President of the United States! Not now and not ever!
Try really hard to live with that reality, life will go a lot easier when you do.
[/quote]
I do not think you get it Zeb if %20 of the people vote for Paul ,that is what you call a voting block and people cater to voting blocks
[/quote]
That’s not my point. I was refuting what the author said. We who have worked for Romney know that Paul can add value to his campaign. And if you noticed Paul rarely attacked Romney during the campaign.
There is a reason for that bright eyes…Chew on it a while.
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
The fact that people on here claim that Obama is far left just goes to show how well the propaganda machine in the U.S. works. Extraordinary![/quote]
Yeah, we all know that Obama is a right wing conservative. Those lying bastards![/quote]
Yes and we all know what a committed socialist he is as well. His record speaks…[/quote]
If you understood even a little of how American politics works you would know that if a President wants to move either left or right he does so in increments. Some large some not so large. In his first term he passed the biggest government take over and control of individual rights in the history of the country, national health care. This was against the wishes of about 70% of the American people as well. In his second term he will move even further to the left as there will be no electorate to answer to.
Yes, he’s the most liberal President that we’ve ever had. But this would have been well known by the people had the press done their job. But they were busy trying to get Obama elected.
Stop playing the part of clueless Internet poster…You are playing right?
[/quote]
I would certainly challenge your assertion about the largest take over and control of individual rights being the health care plan. Try the Patriot Act! Which was a Bush plan expanded and supported by Obama. The health care plan gave people an option to choose either a government run plan or choosing a private insurance carrier. The most vehement voice opposing the plan were the pharmaceutical industry and it’s ilk. And most Americans believe their should be some sort of government health care plan. Like those of other industrialized countries such as Australia, Canada, etc.
[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
The fact that people on here claim that Obama is far left just goes to show how well the propaganda machine in the U.S. works. Extraordinary![/quote]
Yeah, we all know that Obama is a right wing conservative. Those lying bastards![/quote]
Yes and we all know what a committed socialist he is as well. His record speaks…[/quote]
If you understood even a little of how American politics works you would know that if a President wants to move either left or right he does so in increments. Some large some not so large. In his first term he passed the biggest government take over and control of individual rights in the history of the country, national health care. This was against the wishes of about 70% of the American people as well. In his second term he will move even further to the left as there will be no electorate to answer to.
Yes, he’s the most liberal President that we’ve ever had. But this would have been well known by the people had the press done their job. But they were busy trying to get Obama elected.
Stop playing the part of clueless Internet poster…You are playing right?
[/quote]
I would certainly challenge your assertion about the largest take over and control of individual rights being the health care plan.[/quote]
When you control such a large part of the economy you control it’s population. That’s why I laugh at the idiots who scream for “free” health care. As you’ve no doubt heard before, a government large enough to give you everything you need is also large enough to take everything that you have!
Thank you for further proving my point.
Not at all true. Most Americans are against national health care. And there is a good reason for that, 75% of Americans are very happy with their current health care. Obama did this to help the roughly 15% without health care. And that was nothing but a power grab by this progressive President.
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
The fact that people on here claim that Obama is far left just goes to show how well the propaganda machine in the U.S. works. Extraordinary![/quote]
Yeah, we all know that Obama is a right wing conservative. Those lying bastards![/quote]
Yes and we all know what a committed socialist he is as well. His record speaks…[/quote]
If you understood even a little of how American politics works you would know that if a President wants to move either left or right he does so in increments. Some large some not so large. In his first term he passed the biggest government take over and control of individual rights in the history of the country, national health care. This was against the wishes of about 70% of the American people as well. In his second term he will move even further to the left as there will be no electorate to answer to.
Yes, he’s the most liberal President that we’ve ever had. But this would have been well known by the people had the press done their job. But they were busy trying to get Obama elected.
Stop playing the part of clueless Internet poster…You are playing right?
[/quote]
I would certainly challenge your assertion about the largest take over and control of individual rights being the health care plan.[/quote]
When you control such a large part of the economy you control it’s population. That’s why I laugh at the idiots who scream for “free” health care. As you’ve no doubt heard before, a government large enough to give you everything you need is also large enough to take everything that you have!
Control of the economy is by the private banking industry - not a national health care plan! Obama is a socialist - for the ultra rich.
Thank you for further proving my point.
You were wrong on your point. The Patriot Act is the most egregious personal rights grab over the general populace ever in the history of this country.
Not at all true. Most Americans are against national health care. And there is a good reason for that, 75% of Americans are very happy with their current health care. Obama did this to help the roughly 15% without health care. And that was nothing but a power grab by this progressive President.[/quote]
Actually this is true and has been so for decades. Americans want control over the unbelievable rising costs in our private run healthcare system. Their is something fundamentally wrong with a healthcare system that puts profits over health.
The U.S. spends roughly twice as much as any other country on healthcare and doesn’t even rank in the top ten. Why should the public be gouged with outrageous healthcare costs? So we can keep the pharmaceutical companies and the like incredibly rich? Why should the public suffer the consequences?
[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
The fact that people on here claim that Obama is far left just goes to show how well the propaganda machine in the U.S. works. Extraordinary![/quote]
Yeah, we all know that Obama is a right wing conservative. Those lying bastards![/quote]
Yes and we all know what a committed socialist he is as well. His record speaks…[/quote]
If you understood even a little of how American politics works you would know that if a President wants to move either left or right he does so in increments. Some large some not so large. In his first term he passed the biggest government take over and control of individual rights in the history of the country, national health care. This was against the wishes of about 70% of the American people as well. In his second term he will move even further to the left as there will be no electorate to answer to.
Yes, he’s the most liberal President that we’ve ever had. But this would have been well known by the people had the press done their job. But they were busy trying to get Obama elected.
Stop playing the part of clueless Internet poster…You are playing right?
[/quote]
I would certainly challenge your assertion about the largest take over and control of individual rights being the health care plan.[/quote]
When you control such a large part of the economy you control it’s population. That’s why I laugh at the idiots who scream for “free” health care. As you’ve no doubt heard before, a government large enough to give you everything you need is also large enough to take everything that you have!
Control of the economy is by the private banking industry - not a national health care plan! Obama is a socialist - for the ultra rich.
Thank you for further proving my point.
You were wrong on your point. The Patriot Act is the most egregious personal rights grab over the general populace ever in the history of this country.
Not at all true. Most Americans are against national health care. And there is a good reason for that, 75% of Americans are very happy with their current health care. Obama did this to help the roughly 15% without health care. And that was nothing but a power grab by this progressive President.[/quote]
Actually this is true and has been so for decades. Americans want control over the unbelievable rising costs in our private run healthcare system. Their is something fundamentally wrong with a healthcare system that puts profits over health.[/quote]
No it isn’t true and simply saying it is doesn’t make it so…sorry.
I was a little off there are more Americans that are happy with their own health care than I originally thought.
“A combined 82% rate their healthcare as either excellent or good, which is on par with previous years.”
This is sort of like Congress. When people are polled “what do you think of Congress” they get low ratings. But, when asked, “what do you think of your own Congressman” the person gets high ratings.
As I said the overwhelmng majority of Americans are Happy with their health care and DO NOT want Obamacare!
[quote]. Why should the public be gouged with outrageous healthcare costs? So we can keep the pharmaceutical companies and the like incredibly rich? Why should the public suffer the consequences?
[/quote]
And the answer to that is competition. By the way Americans are more happy with their health care than any other industrialized nation.
Now stop the nonsense.
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]kneedragger79 wrote:
The Ron Paul “delegate strategy” seems to be working. And he could very well be nominated at the Republican National Convention in Tampa in late summer.[/quote]
LOL! I almost spit up my morning protein shake. No really…you guys don’t get it yet? And after all of those last place finishes?
Absolutely Incredible!
One more time for old time sake:
Ron Paul will NEVER…>EVER be elected President of the United States! Not now and not ever!
Try really hard to live with that reality, life will go a lot easier when you do.
[/quote]
I do not think you get it Zeb if %20 of the people vote for Paul ,that is what you call a voting block and people cater to voting blocks
[/quote]
That’s not my point. I was refuting what the author said. We who have worked for Romney know that Paul can add value to his campaign. And if you noticed Paul rarely attacked Romney during the campaign.
There is a reason for that bright eyes…Chew on it a while.
[/quote]
ZEB your point is all you can see , chew on that a while
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
The fact that people on here claim that Obama is far left just goes to show how well the propaganda machine in the U.S. works. Extraordinary![/quote]
Yeah, we all know that Obama is a right wing conservative. Those lying bastards![/quote]
Yes and we all know what a committed socialist he is as well. His record speaks…[/quote]
If you understood even a little of how American politics works you would know that if a President wants to move either left or right he does so in increments. Some large some not so large. In his first term he passed the biggest government take over and control of individual rights in the history of the country, national health care. This was against the wishes of about 70% of the American people as well. In his second term he will move even further to the left as there will be no electorate to answer to.
Yes, he’s the most liberal President that we’ve ever had. But this would have been well known by the people had the press done their job. But they were busy trying to get Obama elected.
Stop playing the part of clueless Internet poster…You are playing right?
[/quote]
I would certainly challenge your assertion about the largest take over and control of individual rights being the health care plan.[/quote]
When you control such a large part of the economy you control it’s population. That’s why I laugh at the idiots who scream for “free” health care. As you’ve no doubt heard before, a government large enough to give you everything you need is also large enough to take everything that you have!
Control of the economy is by the private banking industry - not a national health care plan! Obama is a socialist - for the ultra rich.
Thank you for further proving my point.
You were wrong on your point. The Patriot Act is the most egregious personal rights grab over the general populace ever in the history of this country.
Not at all true. Most Americans are against national health care. And there is a good reason for that, 75% of Americans are very happy with their current health care. Obama did this to help the roughly 15% without health care. And that was nothing but a power grab by this progressive President.[/quote]
Actually this is true and has been so for decades. Americans want control over the unbelievable rising costs in our private run healthcare system. Their is something fundamentally wrong with a healthcare system that puts profits over health.[/quote]
No it isn’t true and simply saying it is doesn’t make it so…sorry.
I was a little off there are more Americans that are happy with their own health care than I originally thought.
“A combined 82% rate their healthcare as either excellent or good, which is on par with previous years.”
This is sort of like Congress. When people are polled “what do you think of Congress” they get low ratings. But, when asked, “what do you think of your own Congressman” the person gets high ratings.
As I said the overwhelmng majority of Americans are Happy with their health care and DO NOT want Obamacare!
[quote]. Why should the public be gouged with outrageous healthcare costs? So we can keep the pharmaceutical companies and the like incredibly rich? Why should the public suffer the consequences?
[/quote]
And the answer to that is competition. By the way Americans are more happy with their health care than any other industrialized nation.
Now stop the nonsense.
[/quote]
I am curious how 82% of the people are happy with their health care when 82% of the people don’t even have health care ?
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
The fact that people on here claim that Obama is far left just goes to show how well the propaganda machine in the U.S. works. Extraordinary![/quote]
Yeah, we all know that Obama is a right wing conservative. Those lying bastards![/quote]
Yes and we all know what a committed socialist he is as well. His record speaks…[/quote]
If you understood even a little of how American politics works you would know that if a President wants to move either left or right he does so in increments. Some large some not so large. In his first term he passed the biggest government take over and control of individual rights in the history of the country, national health care. This was against the wishes of about 70% of the American people as well. In his second term he will move even further to the left as there will be no electorate to answer to.
Yes, he’s the most liberal President that we’ve ever had. But this would have been well known by the people had the press done their job. But they were busy trying to get Obama elected.
Stop playing the part of clueless Internet poster…You are playing right?
[/quote]
I would certainly challenge your assertion about the largest take over and control of individual rights being the health care plan.[/quote]
When you control such a large part of the economy you control it’s population. That’s why I laugh at the idiots who scream for “free” health care. As you’ve no doubt heard before, a government large enough to give you everything you need is also large enough to take everything that you have!
Control of the economy is by the private banking industry - not a national health care plan! Obama is a socialist - for the ultra rich.
Thank you for further proving my point.
You were wrong on your point. The Patriot Act is the most egregious personal rights grab over the general populace ever in the history of this country.
Not at all true. Most Americans are against national health care. And there is a good reason for that, 75% of Americans are very happy with their current health care. Obama did this to help the roughly 15% without health care. And that was nothing but a power grab by this progressive President.[/quote]
Actually this is true and has been so for decades. Americans want control over the unbelievable rising costs in our private run healthcare system. Their is something fundamentally wrong with a healthcare system that puts profits over health.[/quote]
No it isn’t true and simply saying it is doesn’t make it so…sorry.
I was a little off there are more Americans that are happy with their own health care than I originally thought.
“A combined 82% rate their healthcare as either excellent or good, which is on par with previous years.”
This is sort of like Congress. When people are polled “what do you think of Congress” they get low ratings. But, when asked, “what do you think of your own Congressman” the person gets high ratings.
As I said the overwhelmng majority of Americans are Happy with their health care and DO NOT want Obamacare!
[quote]. Why should the public be gouged with outrageous healthcare costs? So we can keep the pharmaceutical companies and the like incredibly rich? Why should the public suffer the consequences?
[/quote]
And the answer to that is competition. By the way Americans are more happy with their health care than any other industrialized nation.
Now stop the nonsense.
[/quote]
I am curious how 82% of the people are happy with their health care when 82% of the people don’t even have health care ?
[/quote]
I’d ask you to stop being clueless but I know you can’t.
So…
Face Off: Ron Paul vs. Paul Krugman on Bloomberg TV - April 30, 2012
April 30, 2012 @ 7:35 pm
Ron Paul on CNBC 4/23/12
Why is Ron Paul the choice of the troops?
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
The fact that people on here claim that Obama is far left just goes to show how well the propaganda machine in the U.S. works. Extraordinary![/quote]
Yeah, we all know that Obama is a right wing conservative. Those lying bastards![/quote]
Yes and we all know what a committed socialist he is as well. His record speaks…[/quote]
If you understood even a little of how American politics works you would know that if a President wants to move either left or right he does so in increments. Some large some not so large. In his first term he passed the biggest government take over and control of individual rights in the history of the country, national health care. This was against the wishes of about 70% of the American people as well. In his second term he will move even further to the left as there will be no electorate to answer to.
Yes, he’s the most liberal President that we’ve ever had. But this would have been well known by the people had the press done their job. But they were busy trying to get Obama elected.
Stop playing the part of clueless Internet poster…You are playing right?
[/quote]
I would certainly challenge your assertion about the largest take over and control of individual rights being the health care plan.[/quote]
When you control such a large part of the economy you control it’s population. That’s why I laugh at the idiots who scream for “free” health care. As you’ve no doubt heard before, a government large enough to give you everything you need is also large enough to take everything that you have!
Control of the economy is by the private banking industry - not a national health care plan! Obama is a socialist - for the ultra rich.
Thank you for further proving my point.
You were wrong on your point. The Patriot Act is the most egregious personal rights grab over the general populace ever in the history of this country.
Not at all true. Most Americans are against national health care. And there is a good reason for that, 75% of Americans are very happy with their current health care. Obama did this to help the roughly 15% without health care. And that was nothing but a power grab by this progressive President.[/quote]
Actually this is true and has been so for decades. Americans want control over the unbelievable rising costs in our private run healthcare system. Their is something fundamentally wrong with a healthcare system that puts profits over health.[/quote]
No it isn’t true and simply saying it is doesn’t make it so…sorry.
I was a little off there are more Americans that are happy with their own health care than I originally thought.
“A combined 82% rate their healthcare as either excellent or good, which is on par with previous years.”
This is sort of like Congress. When people are polled “what do you think of Congress” they get low ratings. But, when asked, “what do you think of your own Congressman” the person gets high ratings.
As I said the overwhelmng majority of Americans are Happy with their health care and DO NOT want Obamacare!
[quote]. Why should the public be gouged with outrageous healthcare costs? So we can keep the pharmaceutical companies and the like incredibly rich? Why should the public suffer the consequences?
[/quote]
And the answer to that is competition. By the way Americans are more happy with their health care than any other industrialized nation.
Now stop the nonsense.
[/quote]
So the answer -according to you- as to why Americans pay about twice as much for healthcare is competition? Seriously?
Why aren’t the government run aspects of healthcare increasing in costs the way the private sector is?
And if you really believe that people are happy paying twice as much for anything to get less than stellar results, you my friend ae blind.
[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
So the answer -according to you- as to why Americans pay about twice as much for healthcare is competition? Seriously?
Why aren’t the government run aspects of healthcare increasing in costs the way the private sector is?
And if you really believe that people are happy paying twice as much for anything to get less than stellar results, you my friend ae blind.
[/quote]
Lack of competition. Induced by government regulations btw.
With all that red tape, who knows?
If you get cancer in the US you have the best chance in the world to survive. Unless you get Medicaid treatment of course, than you are better off without it. Not just with another plan, without it. You die sooner if you get their treatment.
I would say that at least those people are happily paying twice the amount of Medicaid to receive the best service they can get on this planet.
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
So the answer -according to you- as to why Americans pay about twice as much for healthcare is competition? Seriously?
Why aren’t the government run aspects of healthcare increasing in costs the way the private sector is?
And if you really believe that people are happy paying twice as much for anything to get less than stellar results, you my friend ae blind.
[/quote]
Lack of competition. Induced by government regulations btw.
With all that red tape, who knows?
If you get cancer in the US you have the best chance in the world to survive. Unless you get Medicaid treatment of course, than you are better off without it. Not just with another plan, without it. You die sooner if you get their treatment.
I would say that at least those people are happily paying twice the amount of Medicaid to receive the best service they can get on this planet. [/quote]
Government regulation? Oh is that like all the regulation which was gutted in the finance sector? That proved to work out awesome!
The U.S. isn’t even ranked in the top ten for healthcare services, so what are we paying twice as much?