[quote]malevolence wrote:
JeffR wrote:
malevolence wrote:
JeffR wrote:
malevolence wrote:
Zeppelin795 wrote:
JeffR
Dustins reference to your democrat vs. republican mentality and his view that the war is more complicated than what you propose has nothing to do with moral relativism! It is a critque of the points you try and make.
For simple minded folk, if it is ‘more complicated’ it is immediately placed with the opposite extreme, in this case, moral relativism. There is no middle ground, not enough brain cells to support it.
mal, zep, petey, etc,
I’m not exactly sure why you twirps keep crowning yourselves the brain trust.
It says something that in all this time your pals haven’t come up with anything better than “we are against Bush.”
Yet, you have the audacity to lecture the proactive about brains.
One question I’d like each of you to consider (if you can): Have you ever considered that it’s YOU who are wrong?
For myself, I’ve said from day one that Iraq was a tremendous risk.
However, it cannot be said to be more risky that 1776. Remember the foe. Remember what the polling stated at that time.
Again, I ask you with all sincerity, what if it is YOU who are on the wrong side?
JeffR
Jeff, it is not an issue of Right and Wrong. That is the whole point. There are not two sides to this. Your inability to see that(let alone understand that) resonates with every post you make.
0 for 2.
Anyone on the left open to the possibility that they are wrong?
If the answer is no, it brilliantly illustrates your close mindedness.
JeffR
Here’s a hint: I’m not on the left.
[/quote]
Oh, great another “independent.”
Let me rephrase: For the guys on the left (independents)…
Better?
JeffR