I will continue doing my disclaimer because I promised to do so. I was growing tired of someone saying that I should make a disclaimer. It least I will be covering my need to explain the value of my experience. Everyone can make their own assessment.
2 Likes
I was i used it on and off from 25-35 (im now 37) i never had a problem in my 20s but then around 32 i started having extremely high blood pressure 210 over 120 while on cycle. Then during my last cycle of tren at 35 i got extremly bad adema it took 2 months for my body to return to normal it nearly killed me. Now i usually run primo, mast, and var and of course test cyp. This cycle i dropped mast and am using eq instead. Ive noticed you keep alot more of the gains off cycle and am just as big as i was on tren with less b.f. I will never run. Tren or deca for that matter again. The risks to health are not worth the reward. Hope this helps
2 Likes
Sorry guys, I wasn’t being quite literal with the disclaimer. As @tareload said, you post whatever you want my friend.
I think this is so. Whether mine were knock offs back in the day or legit I will never know but they did TRY to look like the legit stuff. Mine were also octagonal and pink like the real stuff. They were the tears of baby muscled angels raining from heaven. 
2 Likes
This wasn’t at you at all. Story there comes from further up in the thread 
And we covered the cycling frequency component of this in another thread. I just thought it is silly up above to burden @RT_Nomad with having to state his stuff was Pharma and legit when others won’t go to trouble of checking their stuff… hence the flawed (IMO) recommendation put forth was we shouldn’t discuss dosages on here as it may it discourage or upset some who runs subpar stuff.
1 Like
From my 1979 Physicians’ Desk Reference.
The Dianabol we all used was the light blue 5mg, with “CIBA” scored on one side and “-20-” scored on the other side. I had a light blue T-shirt that I wrote with a magic marker, CIBA on the front and -20- on the back, that I sometimes wore to the gym.
I have never seen the 5 sided pink version of Dianabol…
The first brand of pharmaceutical generic brand of Dianabol I saw was made by Par. It too was light blue.
4 Likes
Note the Dosage and Administration.
This is the only source of information I had until 1979. (I should mention I bought this PDR to replace the 1970 edition that I first had.) This is where I began my cycling protocol.
My initial cycles were 4 weeks on and 4 weeks off. Once I started stacking 1977, I began extending on time and off time. My first stack was adding 100mg/wk of Deca to 15mg/day of Dianabol. I was up to 8 weeks on and 6 weeks off.
BTW, the first Deca we got was only 100mg/cc. By 1979 we were able to get the 200mg/cc concentration.
2 Likes
1 Like
I haven’t seen it, but I have heard others talk about Dbol that fits that description and being really good.
1 Like
I typically disagree with @hankthetank89 as well, but in this thread, I agree with him on several thoughts.
1 Like
That’s awesome that you still have it. It’s amazing the wealth of knowledge we have at our fingertips. Kinda cool to see what your source material was. Thanks for sharing that!
1 Like
I believe the drug can still be prescribed in parts of SE asia
https://www.mims.com/philippines/drug/info/metandienone?mtype=generic
Still on mims (Phillipipines)
Whether the drug is actually available… thats another matter altogether.
If it means anything… the dbol I tried around three years ago was very potent. 15mg/day for constant pumps
That isn’t a particuarly atrocious dose relative to the “50mg/day” quota typically touted in gyms and on forums.
I ran 360mg/week split 3x per week, TT was 2041ng/dL, however SHBG was single digits from a bit of Var. Not sure if that info is useful for your graphs or not.
1 Like