Quoting

[quote]TrainerinDC wrote:
SWR-1240 wrote:
pushharder wrote:
Split wrote: Settle down on the damn quoting. My god. You do NOT need to quote the original poster. We already know you are replying to their message, especially if your the 1st reply. Holy shit. Think before you quote, thank you.

Split wrote:
Settle down on the damn quoting. My god. You do NOT need to quote the original poster. We already know you are replying to their message, especially if your the 1st reply. Holy shit. Think before you quote, thank you.

/end rant

Good idea. People should really stop doing this.

Split wrote:
Settle down on the damn quoting. My god. You do NOT need to quote the original poster. We already know you are replying to their message, especially if your the 1st reply. Holy shit. Think before you quote, thank you.

/end rant

Agreed. Holy shit, those people are morons. I mean, My god.

Split wrote:
Settle down on the damn quoting. My god. You do NOT need to quote the original poster. We already know you are replying to their message, especially if your the 1st reply. Holy shit. Think before you quote, thank you.

/end rant

Split wrote:
saw this coming!

Everybody saw that coming.

Split wrote:
Settle down on the damn quoting. My god. You do NOT need to quote the original poster. We already know you are replying to their message, especially if your the 1st reply. Holy shit. Think before you quote, thank you.

/end rant

Couldn’t agree more! Those dumb fuckers!

I can’t help it. I just laughes out loud. I knew it was coming before I scrolled down—and I still laughed.

The only thing funnier would have been like 3 pages of it.

Helga wrote:
Split wrote:
Settle down on the damn quoting. My god. You do NOT need to quote the original poster. We already know you are replying to their message, especially if your the 1st reply. Holy shit. Think before you quote, thank you.

/end rant

Split wrote:
saw this coming!

Everybody saw that coming.

I hate when someone quotes more than one post at a time and doesn’t delete the one he’s not responding to.

sasquatch wrote:
I can’t help it. I just laughes out loud. I knew it was coming before I scrolled down—and I still laughed.

The only thing funnier would have been like 3 pages of it.

Not only that, but the original idea doesn’t make much sense. How would anyone know I was responding to what YOU wrote if there are several posts above mine? I could be speaking to anyone. Also, if someone makes a HUGE post, and I want to respond to each point individually, why wouldn’t I quote those parts and respond to each alone? I’m supposed to retype everything?

SWR-1240 wrote:
Helga wrote:
Split wrote:
Settle down on the damn quoting. My god. You do NOT need to quote the original poster. We already know you are replying to their message, especially if your the 1st reply. Holy shit. Think before you quote, thank you.

/end rantI do like when people post in between posts though. When I first saw that I thought the people doing it were really computer savy.

Split wrote:
saw this coming!

Everybody saw that coming.

I hate when someone quotes more than one post at a time and doesn’t delete the one he’s not responding to.

What’s worse is when someone quotes themselves.

Professor X wrote:
sasquatch wrote:
I can’t help it. I just laughes out loud. I knew it was coming before I scrolled down—and I still laughed.

The only thing funnier would have been like 3 pages of it.

Not only that, but the original idea doesn’t make much sense. How would anyone know I was responding to what YOU wrote if there are several posts above mine? I could be speaking to anyone. Also, if someone makes a HUGE post, and I want to respond to each point individually, why wouldn’t I quote those parts and respond to each alone? I’m supposed to retype everything?

Well you do nothing else besides post here. Seems to me like you have the time!

Split wrote:
Settle down on the damn quoting. My god. You do NOT need to quote the original poster. We already know you are replying to their message, especially if your the 1st reply. Holy shit. Think before you quote, thank you.

/end rant

It is really annoying when people do this, I definitely have to agree.

(I know its already been done, couldn’t resist)

What SWR said.

SWR-1240 wrote:
Helga wrote:
Split wrote:
Settle down on the damn quoting. My god. You do NOT need to quote the original poster. We already know you are replying to their message, especially if your the 1st reply. Holy shit. Think before you quote, thank you.

/end rant

Split wrote:
saw this coming!

Everybody saw that coming.

I hate when someone quotes more than one post at a time and doesn’t delete the one he’s not responding to.

/end rant

Split wrote: saw this coming!

But you did it anyway.

HA!
I was thinking about doing the same thing, but I was too lazy. :smiley:

Look at all this wasted bandwith spent quoting. Maybe the original poster had a point.
[/quote]

What are you guys talking about again?

[quote]Dweezil wrote:
TrainerinDC wrote:
SWR-1240 wrote:
pushharder wrote:
Split wrote: Settle down on the damn quoting. My god. You do NOT need to quote the original poster. We already know you are replying to their message, especially if your the 1st reply. Holy shit. Think before you quote, thank you.

Split wrote:
Settle down on the damn quoting. My god. You do NOT need to quote the original poster. We already know you are replying to their message, especially if your the 1st reply. Holy shit. Think before you quote, thank you.

/end rant

Good idea. People should really stop doing this.

Split wrote:
Settle down on the damn quoting. My god. You do NOT need to quote the original poster. We already know you are replying to their message, especially if your the 1st reply. Holy shit. Think before you quote, thank you.

/end rant

Agreed. Holy shit, those people are morons. I mean, My god.

Split wrote:
Settle down on the damn quoting. My god. You do NOT need to quote the original poster. We already know you are replying to their message, especially if your the 1st reply. Holy shit. Think before you quote, thank you.

/end rant

Split wrote:
saw this coming!

Everybody saw that coming.

Split wrote:
Settle down on the damn quoting. My god. You do NOT need to quote the original poster. We already know you are replying to their message, especially if your the 1st reply. Holy shit. Think before you quote, thank you.

/end rant

Couldn’t agree more! Those dumb fuckers!

I can’t help it. I just laughes out loud. I knew it was coming before I scrolled down—and I still laughed.

The only thing funnier would have been like 3 pages of it.

Helga wrote:
Split wrote:
Settle down on the damn quoting. My god. You do NOT need to quote the original poster. We already know you are replying to their message, especially if your the 1st reply. Holy shit. Think before you quote, thank you.

/end rant

Split wrote:
saw this coming!

Everybody saw that coming.

I hate when someone quotes more than one post at a time and doesn’t delete the one he’s not responding to.

sasquatch wrote:
I can’t help it. I just laughes out loud. I knew it was coming before I scrolled down—and I still laughed.

The only thing funnier would have been like 3 pages of it.

Not only that, but the original idea doesn’t make much sense. How would anyone know I was responding to what YOU wrote if there are several posts above mine? I could be speaking to anyone. Also, if someone makes a HUGE post, and I want to respond to each point individually, why wouldn’t I quote those parts and respond to each alone? I’m supposed to retype everything?

SWR-1240 wrote:
Helga wrote:
Split wrote:
Settle down on the damn quoting. My god. You do NOT need to quote the original poster. We already know you are replying to their message, especially if your the 1st reply. Holy shit. Think before you quote, thank you.

/end rantI do like when people post in between posts though. When I first saw that I thought the people doing it were really computer savy.

Split wrote:
saw this coming!

Everybody saw that coming.

I hate when someone quotes more than one post at a time and doesn’t delete the one he’s not responding to.

What’s worse is when someone quotes themselves.

Professor X wrote:
sasquatch wrote:
I can’t help it. I just laughes out loud. I knew it was coming before I scrolled down—and I still laughed.

The only thing funnier would have been like 3 pages of it.

Not only that, but the original idea doesn’t make much sense. How would anyone know I was responding to what YOU wrote if there are several posts above mine? I could be speaking to anyone. Also, if someone makes a HUGE post, and I want to respond to each point individually, why wouldn’t I quote those parts and respond to each alone? I’m supposed to retype everything?

Well you do nothing else besides post here. Seems to me like you have the time!

Split wrote:
Settle down on the damn quoting. My god. You do NOT need to quote the original poster. We already know you are replying to their message, especially if your the 1st reply. Holy shit. Think before you quote, thank you.

/end rant

It is really annoying when people do this, I definitely have to agree.

(I know its already been done, couldn’t resist)

What SWR said.

SWR-1240 wrote:
Helga wrote:
Split wrote:
Settle down on the damn quoting. My god. You do NOT need to quote the original poster. We already know you are replying to their message, especially if your the 1st reply. Holy shit. Think before you quote, thank you.

/end rant

Split wrote:
saw this coming!

Everybody saw that coming.

I hate when someone quotes more than one post at a time and doesn’t delete the one he’s not responding to.

/end rant

Split wrote: saw this coming!

But you did it anyway.

HA!
I was thinking about doing the same thing, but I was too lazy. :smiley:

Look at all this wasted bandwith spent quoting. Maybe the original poster had a point.

What are you guys talking about again?[/quote]

I really dunno bro. I keep quoting trying to figure it out and its not working.

[quote]TrainerinDC wrote:
Dweezil wrote:
TrainerinDC wrote:
SWR-1240 wrote:
pushharder wrote:
Split wrote: Settle down on the damn quoting. My god. You do NOT need to quote the original poster. We already know you are replying to their message, especially if your the 1st reply. Holy shit. Think before you quote, thank you.

Split wrote:
Settle down on the damn quoting. My god. You do NOT need to quote the original poster. We already know you are replying to their message, especially if your the 1st reply. Holy shit. Think before you quote, thank you.

/end rant

Good idea. People should really stop doing this.

Split wrote:
Settle down on the damn quoting. My god. You do NOT need to quote the original poster. We already know you are replying to their message, especially if your the 1st reply. Holy shit. Think before you quote, thank you.

/end rant

Agreed. Holy shit, those people are morons. I mean, My god.

Split wrote:
Settle down on the damn quoting. My god. You do NOT need to quote the original poster. We already know you are replying to their message, especially if your the 1st reply. Holy shit. Think before you quote, thank you.

/end rant

Split wrote:
saw this coming!

Everybody saw that coming.

Split wrote:
Settle down on the damn quoting. My god. You do NOT need to quote the original poster. We already know you are replying to their message, especially if your the 1st reply. Holy shit. Think before you quote, thank you.

/end rant

Couldn’t agree more! Those dumb fuckers!

I can’t help it. I just laughes out loud. I knew it was coming before I scrolled down—and I still laughed.

The only thing funnier would have been like 3 pages of it.

Helga wrote:
Split wrote:
Settle down on the damn quoting. My god. You do NOT need to quote the original poster. We already know you are replying to their message, especially if your the 1st reply. Holy shit. Think before you quote, thank you.

/end rant

Split wrote:
saw this coming!

Everybody saw that coming.

I hate when someone quotes more than one post at a time and doesn’t delete the one he’s not responding to.

sasquatch wrote:
I can’t help it. I just laughes out loud. I knew it was coming before I scrolled down—and I still laughed.

The only thing funnier would have been like 3 pages of it.

Not only that, but the original idea doesn’t make much sense. How would anyone know I was responding to what YOU wrote if there are several posts above mine? I could be speaking to anyone. Also, if someone makes a HUGE post, and I want to respond to each point individually, why wouldn’t I quote those parts and respond to each alone? I’m supposed to retype everything?

SWR-1240 wrote:
Helga wrote:
Split wrote:
Settle down on the damn quoting. My god. You do NOT need to quote the original poster. We already know you are replying to their message, especially if your the 1st reply. Holy shit. Think before you quote, thank you.

/end rantI do like when people post in between posts though. When I first saw that I thought the people doing it were really computer savy.

Split wrote:
saw this coming!

Everybody saw that coming.

I hate when someone quotes more than one post at a time and doesn’t delete the one he’s not responding to.

What’s worse is when someone quotes themselves.

Professor X wrote:
sasquatch wrote:
I can’t help it. I just laughes out loud. I knew it was coming before I scrolled down—and I still laughed.

The only thing funnier would have been like 3 pages of it.

Not only that, but the original idea doesn’t make much sense. How would anyone know I was responding to what YOU wrote if there are several posts above mine? I could be speaking to anyone. Also, if someone makes a HUGE post, and I want to respond to each point individually, why wouldn’t I quote those parts and respond to each alone? I’m supposed to retype everything?

Well you do nothing else besides post here. Seems to me like you have the time!

Split wrote:
Settle down on the damn quoting. My god. You do NOT need to quote the original poster. We already know you are replying to their message, especially if your the 1st reply. Holy shit. Think before you quote, thank you.

/end rant

It is really annoying when people do this, I definitely have to agree.

(I know its already been done, couldn’t resist)

What SWR said.

SWR-1240 wrote:
Helga wrote:
Split wrote:
Settle down on the damn quoting. My god. You do NOT need to quote the original poster. We already know you are replying to their message, especially if your the 1st reply. Holy shit. Think before you quote, thank you.

/end rant

Split wrote:
saw this coming!

Everybody saw that coming.

I hate when someone quotes more than one post at a time and doesn’t delete the one he’s not responding to.

/end rant

Split wrote: saw this coming!

But you did it anyway.

HA!
I was thinking about doing the same thing, but I was too lazy. :smiley:

Look at all this wasted bandwith spent quoting. Maybe the original poster had a point.

What are you guys talking about again?

I really dunno bro. I keep quoting trying to figure it out and its not working. [/quote]

[quote]mazilla wrote:
TrainerinDC wrote:
Dweezil wrote:
TrainerinDC wrote:
SWR-1240 wrote:
pushharder wrote:
Split wrote: Settle down on the damn quoting. My god. You do NOT need to quote the original poster. We already know you are replying to their message, especially if your the 1st reply. Holy shit. Think before you quote, thank you.

Split wrote:
Settle down on the damn quoting. My god. You do NOT need to quote the original poster. We already know you are replying to their message, especially if your the 1st reply. Holy shit. Think before you quote, thank you.

/end rant

Good idea. People should really stop doing this.

Split wrote:
Settle down on the damn quoting. My god. You do NOT need to quote the original poster. We already know you are replying to their message, especially if your the 1st reply. Holy shit. Think before you quote, thank you.

/end rant

Agreed. Holy shit, those people are morons. I mean, My god.

Split wrote:
Settle down on the damn quoting. My god. You do NOT need to quote the original poster. We already know you are replying to their message, especially if your the 1st reply. Holy shit. Think before you quote, thank you.

/end rant

Split wrote:
saw this coming!

Everybody saw that coming.

Split wrote:
Settle down on the damn quoting. My god. You do NOT need to quote the original poster. We already know you are replying to their message, especially if your the 1st reply. Holy shit. Think before you quote, thank you.

/end rant

Couldn’t agree more! Those dumb fuckers!

I can’t help it. I just laughes out loud. I knew it was coming before I scrolled down—and I still laughed.

The only thing funnier would have been like 3 pages of it.

Helga wrote:
Split wrote:
Settle down on the damn quoting. My god. You do NOT need to quote the original poster. We already know you are replying to their message, especially if your the 1st reply. Holy shit. Think before you quote, thank you.

/end rant

Split wrote:
saw this coming!

Everybody saw that coming.

I hate when someone quotes more than one post at a time and doesn’t delete the one he’s not responding to.

sasquatch wrote:
I can’t help it. I just laughes out loud. I knew it was coming before I scrolled down—and I still laughed.

The only thing funnier would have been like 3 pages of it.

Not only that, but the original idea doesn’t make much sense. How would anyone know I was responding to what YOU wrote if there are several posts above mine? I could be speaking to anyone. Also, if someone makes a HUGE post, and I want to respond to each point individually, why wouldn’t I quote those parts and respond to each alone? I’m supposed to retype everything?

SWR-1240 wrote:
Helga wrote:
Split wrote:
Settle down on the damn quoting. My god. You do NOT need to quote the original poster. We already know you are replying to their message, especially if your the 1st reply. Holy shit. Think before you quote, thank you.

/end rantI do like when people post in between posts though. When I first saw that I thought the people doing it were really computer savy.

Split wrote:
saw this coming!

Everybody saw that coming.

I hate when someone quotes more than one post at a time and doesn’t delete the one he’s not responding to.

What’s worse is when someone quotes themselves.

Professor X wrote:
sasquatch wrote:
I can’t help it. I just laughes out loud. I knew it was coming before I scrolled down—and I still laughed.

The only thing funnier would have been like 3 pages of it.

Not only that, but the original idea doesn’t make much sense. How would anyone know I was responding to what YOU wrote if there are several posts above mine? I could be speaking to anyone. Also, if someone makes a HUGE post, and I want to respond to each point individually, why wouldn’t I quote those parts and respond to each alone? I’m supposed to retype everything?

Well you do nothing else besides post here. Seems to me like you have the time!

Split wrote:
Settle down on the damn quoting. My god. You do NOT need to quote the original poster. We already know you are replying to their message, especially if your the 1st reply. Holy shit. Think before you quote, thank you.

/end rant

It is really annoying when people do this, I definitely have to agree.

(I know its already been done, couldn’t resist)

What SWR said.

SWR-1240 wrote:
Helga wrote:
Split wrote:
Settle down on the damn quoting. My god. You do NOT need to quote the original poster. We already know you are replying to their message, especially if your the 1st reply. Holy shit. Think before you quote, thank you.

/end rant

Split wrote:
saw this coming!

Everybody saw that coming.

I hate when someone quotes more than one post at a time and doesn’t delete the one he’s not responding to.

/end rant

Split wrote: saw this coming!

But you did it anyway.

HA!
I was thinking about doing the same thing, but I was too lazy. :smiley:

Look at all this wasted bandwith spent quoting. Maybe the original poster had a point.

What are you guys talking about again?

I really dunno bro. I keep quoting trying to figure it out and its not working.

[/quote]

I just dont have anything better to do with my time than go around quoting.