President of the US Picks

Well, glad you’re asking. So as long as you understand Trump misused a statistic to start the Mexico is sending us its rapists (and ā€œSOMEā€ good people) myth.

No, here. In the US…

Yep. The Democrats had a broad-based party (big moderate and conservative wing), and the GOP didn’t have the Tea Party wing yet. Much smarter. And better.

We’re talking parties and their strength, not necessarily individuals.

The largest union representing US border patrol officer endorsed Trump, so clearly they see it as a big problem.

Here is their quote:

ā€œThere is no greater physical or economic threat to Americans today than our open border. And there is no greater political threat than the control of Washington by special interests. In view of these threats, the National Border Patrol Council endorses Donald J. Trump for Presidentā€¦ā€

Gotta mean something

Of course it means ā€œsomething.ā€ But it doesn’t mean the picture Trump tried to paint. Not even close

so you’re basically harping on how Trump presented the issue? In his book he talks about this as a persuasion tactic. Playing to people’s fantasies and having people ā€œthink bigā€. It’s how he gets his point across, if you don’t like it FINE.

But he’s brought light to a very real and important issue. And honestly that’s one of the reasons why he is so popular.

Nope. Describing a situation isn’t enabling anything. That’s just stupid.

[quote=ā€œtherajraj, post:551, topic:215570, full:trueā€]
so you’re basically harping on how Trump presented the issue? In his book he talks about this as a persuasion tactic. Playing to people’s fantasies and having people "think big…[/quote]

Well, yes. I don’t like con-men trying to misuse stats in order to target a group of people who, believe it or not, aren’t raping our mothers, sisters, and daughters in some pretend epidemic. We’re not even talking about conning people over real estate here. These are people. Human beings man. And the best he can do is ā€œassumeā€ that ā€œsomeā€ are good people? Wowwwww. Count me the heck out.

[quote=ā€œpushharder, post:553, topic:215570, full:trueā€]

So whites are pouncing on these illegal Central Americans and Mexicans once they make it to the land of the free and home of the brave?[/quote]

No, you’re not following the conversation well enough between me and Raj. I’m talking about Trump’s assertion that Mexico is pretty much sending us its rapists (so, here, raping people, here). This epidemic is a fantasy. In fact, if you all want to keep your women safe, watch out for us whites…

Frame whatever you like - describing the makeup of the Democratic Party in 2006, which was broader since it had moderate and conservative members (which was how it was able to win back the House), isn’t ā€œenabling liberalismā€.

Again, that’s just stupid. It’s a non-sequitur.

Ok, and? What argument are you trying to make with me? We’re not discussing the percentage of Central American women raped ON THEIR JOURNEY HERE. We’re talking about how TRUMP characterized the Mexican migrants HERE as rapists. Two different things.