Harris was worse, IMO. She said it was time to have ‘a conversation’ about it, which is meaty mouthed bullshit.
At least Bernie owns his stances.
Harris was worse, IMO. She said it was time to have ‘a conversation’ about it, which is meaty mouthed bullshit.
At least Bernie owns his stances.
Hilarious.
I do try.
Biden on gay people in the government. Take that mayor Pete!
Pop goes the Beto.
Not to put a conspiratorial hat on. But it does seem that the daggers are already drawn.
No way this sinks him. It was 20 years ago ffs.
Sure seems that way. I was hoping the Dems would learn from last time
I’m vaguely interested in what the masses think of the DWI incident.
Years ago, if you didn’t hurt anyone, people didn’t get so worked up over driving after drinking.
During the worst years of the last Recession, when there were a hundred applicants for every good job, a DUI was like an automatic disqualifyer. Regular people followed employers really began to look down on it.
Whats the current stance?
I definitely think less of him than I would sans DUI, but nowhere near considerably less in the context of pols.
From the staffing industry, it’s not a “deal-breaker” per se. But if our clients got Joe Schmo and Joe Blow’s information in front of them, the DUI is easily tiebreaker material. This is assuming a “victimless” DUI ala Beto.
Virtually all of the truck driver positions we fill it’s an instant DQ though. I BELIEVE the same goes for forklift (etc) drivers, but don’t quote me on that.
For me? It’s a moral blight. On US roads, perhaps less so. Y’all have 1000 mile straight roads, especially out in Texas.
On Irish and British roads, we have jack knife turns every 5 minutes. We put drunk drivers in the dock.
Re: Biden: oh, so innappropriate behavior toward women is now disqualifying because principles and ethics. Got it. Unclear why that wasn’t the case in 2016.
Oh wait, yes I do - he’s a liberal so it’s totally different you guys.
Anyway, I don’t want to derail and make this thread about Trump, but in assessing Democratic candidates, there’s a bunch off-limits now to criticize them over as disqualifying. I touched on inappropriate behavior toward women above. Lying? As in Warren being disqualified because of her previous falsehoods about ancestry to get ahead in her career? Nope, that’s been deemed ok - Trump made a career out of it, and is setting new records in that space now. And it’s cool. And on and on. That stuff won’t stick because it’ll be thrown in Republicans’ faces over and over.
The (only) appeal of Biden is his traditional liberalism and his advantage with working class .voters. That’s a pretty strong case honestly, but it’s fascinating and weird that he’s alone in carrying that torch for the Dems. Shows how much the party has changed.
I knew there was something odd about grandpa.
Guys:
Trump HAS to be mentioned here…
Trump and “the Field” WILL NOT be judged in the same way. That’s just the way it is.
It’s been apparent since Trump announced his candidacy that any lying, cheating, dishonesty, illegalities, assaults, and the like that would destroy any other Politician only elevates him.
I have NO idea why…but again…that’s the way it is…and Trump and his Minions know it.
MAGA.
Well, yeah. Trump and the field will in no way be judged the same way. The Democratic field will be thinned out by the Democratic primary voters. Not by Trump and his minions.
It wasn’t Hilary supporters that eliminated low energy Jed, Lyin’ Ted or Little Marco in '16. The Republican primary voters eliminated them.
It’s funny how so many here come up with items that make you say “pop goes” but if we played that with trump in 2016(or even today) people would have blew a blood vessel from saying pop so much and look where he ended up.
Clearly this is because people are MORE excited about pissing off the left than they are about having a squeaky clean president.
People voted for Trump to say “FUCK YOU” to the left. Its clearly working.
I think Trump is a Zionist shill, but oh man 4 more years of liberal heads exploding? I cant wait.
I’ll repeat something I posted earlier in the thread, @anon10035199:
“The GOP is slowly but surely morphing into a term I use called “Trumpublicans”…a mean spirited/fuck-you/as-long-as-I get-what-I want-fuck-you-again/lying-hypocritical-spending as much as the DEMS/holier-than-thou-because-I’m against Abortion/Gays-therefore Jesus Loves me more” Party…redefined; and forever changed; by Trump."
What will be interesting to see is the “long-game”.
Will they, as a Party; be able to “pull-it-back” in 2024?
Do they even want to?
How does it all work without Trump?
It will be fascinating to see.
A fair point indeed. The counterpoint is that the Republican party doesn’t have SJW’s as keepers of their orthodoxy. If you hold candidates to SJW standards then nobody passes that test.
Then POP! Goes the Democrats!
Pelosi is trying as hard as she can to “reel-in” the AOC/Tlaib/Omar “wing” of the party…but the 'ole Gal…as smart and as politically shrewd as she is…only has limited years ahead of her…
Much like the Trumpublican Party…it will be interesting to see the direction the DEMS go over the next few years.
Agree.
But do you think the Dems/Left will also back down on their SJW socialist agenda? I doubt it. I feel like this is just the beginning.
The further the left goes, the right will follow and so on. Both ideologies breed extremism in the other party.