Plame's Civil Suit

Off Topic Politics & World Issues
21

[quote]BostonBarrister wrote:
Marmadogg wrote:
Predictable right wingnut shills come out and attack the Wilson’s.

Pathetic

I know that both the RNC and DNC pay posters to spew talking point on internet forums and blogs but why would the RNC pay Chris to post here?

If you can get them to cut me a check, please do so. I’m right here in DC, so they wouldn’t have to walk very far. However, outside of your fevered reality, the Plame suit looks rather weak on its face, and is coincidentally timed with her need for publicity for that book. Proof? No – but given this couple’s history of grandstanding (Vanity Fair anyone?) and the circumstances, not an outlandish position to take.

Now go debase the integrity of the stock markets some more…[/quote]

You are a traitor for defending traitors.

22

The Wilson’s are trying to sell their book and make some cash.

They have nothing to lose.

23

[quote]Wreckless wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
Wilson and Plame are partisan media whores. These just reinforces my feelings about them.

That’s a lie. She was trying to stay in the shadows when Novak the traitor ratted on her.
[/quote]

Stay in the shadows by:

Appearing in Vanity Fair.

Appearing in Who’s Who.

Sending her unqualified husband on a mission.

Conspiring with her unqualified husband to write a false OP/ED for the NYT that directly conflicted with the testimony he provided the Senate Intel Committee.

Doesn’t sound like to work of someone that is trying to be covert to me.

Stick your accusation of lying up your ass. I know you have trouble with reading comprehension but I hope you understood that.

24

[quote]
BostonBarrister wrote:
Another motive for the filing:

Perhaps they just want to set up an excuse to collect money from the legions of netroots folks:

By all means, please contribute.

There’s one born every minute…

Wreckless wrote:
2 the minute you were born.[/quote]

Was that supposed to be an insult? Are you somehow implying I’m a twin, and a stupid twin?

What exactly goes on in that little head of yours anyway? Nothing higher order, apparently…

25

[quote]Marmadogg wrote:

You are a traitor for defending traitors.[/quote]

Interesting and off-topic logic you have going on there. Would that make you an idiot for defending idiots?

26

This is pretty damn funny, if you’re a Plame Kerfluffle fan (otherwise it won’t make much sense):

“The Day the Fitzmas Died” to the tune of “American Pie” by Don McLean

ADDENDUM: BTW, on a second reading, I was struck by how much of your vocabulary was utilized in the lyrics Marmadogg – luckily, the author prefaced it by saying he was channeling his “inner Moonbat”, so it made perfect sense.

27

[quote]BostonBarrister wrote:
Marmadogg wrote:

You are a traitor for defending traitors.

Interesting and off-topic logic you have going on there. Would that make you an idiot for defending idiots?[/quote]

Are you trying to say that the ‘I’ in CIA stands for ‘Idiots’?

28

[quote]

Marmadogg wrote:

You are a traitor for defending traitors.

BostonBarrister wrote:
Interesting and off-topic logic you have going on there. Would that make you an idiot for defending idiots?

Marmadogg wrote:
Are you trying to say that the ‘I’ in CIA stands for ‘Idiots’?[/quote]

No, though I don’t know how easy it is to make an argument that it functionally stands for “Intelligence” either…

At any rate I was referring to the Plame/Wilsons…

29

You know…

I realize it is a knee-jerk reaction to deflect, distract and discredit whenver possible, but whether or not they are able to make money off of the improper actions of the administration is immaterial.

In fact, if they do, you should respect them, isn’t getting rich the ultimate proof of who is smart or correct or whatever in America?

Anyway, it is satisfying to know that the lawsuit will be conducted within the rules of the legal system, not the political spin system.

It’s also satisfying to know that nobody is now arguing that there is “no proof” that anybody leaked. We all know they leaked, then covered it up, and did all this despite claiming to be a group with high minded ideals.

We are looking at some petty and mean people in a position of power. It’s sad to watch how they comport themselves.

Please proceed to deflect or distract by the actions of others, perhaps Clinton, or suggest that there is no merit to any of this, or any of a myriad of tactics that let you avoid the basic underlying issues of import.

30

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
Wreckless wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
Wilson and Plame are partisan media whores. These just reinforces my feelings about them.

That’s a lie. She was trying to stay in the shadows when Novak the traitor ratted on her.

Stay in the shadows by:

Appearing in Vanity Fair.

Appearing in Who’s Who.

Sending her unqualified husband on a mission.

Conspiring with her unqualified husband to write a false OP/ED for the NYT that directly conflicted with the testimony he provided the Senate Intel Committee.

Doesn’t sound like to work of someone that is trying to be covert to me.

Stick your accusation of lying up your ass. I know you have trouble with reading comprehension but I hope you understood that.[/quote]

Are you saying they appeared in Vanity Fair before your traitor ratted them out?

Or are you saying they should be quiet and sit in a corner after being swift boated by your precious president?

How inconvenient for you that they won’t.

I know you have problems with the real world out there.

In the real world out there, people noticed that Wilson got the facts right. Your supreme commander didn’t.
Now they nailed his ass in Iraq, and thousands of people have died because of his mistakes.

Spin that.

31

[quote]BostonBarrister wrote:

BostonBarrister wrote:
Another motive for the filing:

Perhaps they just want to set up an excuse to collect money from the legions of netroots folks:

By all means, please contribute.

There’s one born every minute…

Wreckless wrote:
2 the minute you were born.

Was that supposed to be an insult? Are you somehow implying I’m a twin, and a stupid twin?

What exactly goes on in that little head of yours anyway? Nothing higher order, apparently…[/quote]

I was implying you’re stupid enough for 2 morons. If you can’t stand the namecalling, you shouldn’t start it.

32

[quote]BostonBarrister wrote:
Marmadogg wrote:

You are a traitor for defending traitors.

Interesting and off-topic logic you have going on there. Would that make you an idiot for defending idiots?[/quote]

It would. If he were defending idiots.

But it seems you’re a traitor for defending traitors.
And an idiot for defending idiots.

33

[quote]Wreckless wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
Wreckless wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
Wilson and Plame are partisan media whores. These just reinforces my feelings about them.

That’s a lie. She was trying to stay in the shadows when Novak the traitor ratted on her.

Stay in the shadows by:

Appearing in Vanity Fair.

Appearing in Who’s Who.

Sending her unqualified husband on a mission.

Conspiring with her unqualified husband to write a false OP/ED for the NYT that directly conflicted with the testimony he provided the Senate Intel Committee.

Doesn’t sound like to work of someone that is trying to be covert to me.

Stick your accusation of lying up your ass. I know you have trouble with reading comprehension but I hope you understood that.

Are you saying they appeared in Vanity Fair before your traitor ratted them out?
[/quote]
Yes. Do you pay any attention at all or do you just regurgitate talking points?

As I noted they were media whores before she was outed. Why would I expect any different now?

[quote]
I know you have problems with the real world out there.

In the real world out there, people noticed that Wilson got the facts right. Your supreme commander didn’t.
Now they nailed his ass in Iraq, and thousands of people have died because of his mistakes.

Spin that.[/quote]

Wilson told the Senate Iraq was trying to buy yellowcake. He wrote an OP/ED for the NYT that said the exact opposite.

These are the facts. Wilson lied in the NYT.

Of course you will ignore the facts.

34

[quote]Wreckless wrote:
BostonBarrister wrote:

BostonBarrister wrote:
Another motive for the filing:

Perhaps they just want to set up an excuse to collect money from the legions of netroots folks:

By all means, please contribute.

There’s one born every minute…

Wreckless wrote:
2 the minute you were born.

Was that supposed to be an insult? Are you somehow implying I’m a twin, and a stupid twin?

What exactly goes on in that little head of yours anyway? Nothing higher order, apparently…

I was implying you’re stupid enough for 2 morons. If you can’t stand the namecalling, you shouldn’t start it.[/quote]

Wreckless, you don’t even know the basics of the story.

Your calling BB stupid is laughable.

Perhaps ypu can hire someone to translate the story into Dutch so you can understand it because I know your English comprehension sucks.

35

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
Wreckless wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
Wreckless wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
Wilson and Plame are partisan media whores. These just reinforces my feelings about them.

That’s a lie. She was trying to stay in the shadows when Novak the traitor ratted on her.

Stay in the shadows by:

Appearing in Vanity Fair.

Appearing in Who’s Who.

Sending her unqualified husband on a mission.

Conspiring with her unqualified husband to write a false OP/ED for the NYT that directly conflicted with the testimony he provided the Senate Intel Committee.

Doesn’t sound like to work of someone that is trying to be covert to me.

Stick your accusation of lying up your ass. I know you have trouble with reading comprehension but I hope you understood that.

Are you saying they appeared in Vanity Fair before your traitor ratted them out?

Yes. Do you pay any attention at all or do you just regurgitate talking points?[/quote]

Surely you have proof.

36

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
Wreckless wrote:
BostonBarrister wrote:

BostonBarrister wrote:
Another motive for the filing:

Perhaps they just want to set up an excuse to collect money from the legions of netroots folks:

By all means, please contribute.

There’s one born every minute…

Wreckless wrote:
2 the minute you were born.

Was that supposed to be an insult? Are you somehow implying I’m a twin, and a stupid twin?

What exactly goes on in that little head of yours anyway? Nothing higher order, apparently…

I was implying you’re stupid enough for 2 morons. If you can’t stand the namecalling, you shouldn’t start it.

Wreckless, you don’t even know the basics of the story.

Your calling BB stupid is laughable.

Perhaps ypu can hire someone to translate the story into Dutch so you can understand it because I know your English comprehension sucks.[/quote]

He might be “intelligent” but he’s not smart. He’s a party whore.
He’s supporting the war monger no matter what.

37

Valerie Plame is hotter than I thought she’d be.

38

[quote]
BostonBarrister wrote:
Another motive for the filing:

Perhaps they just want to set up an excuse to collect money from the legions of netroots folks:

By all means, please contribute.

There’s one born every minute…

Wreckless wrote:
2 the minute you were born.

BostonBarrister wrote:
Was that supposed to be an insult? Are you somehow implying I’m a twin, and a stupid twin?

What exactly goes on in that little head of yours anyway? Nothing higher order, apparently…

Wreckless wrote:
I was implying you’re stupid enough for 2 morons. If you can’t stand the namecalling, you shouldn’t start it.[/quote]

Really, is that what was supposed to be extracted from your drooling gibberish?

Because my initial statement was a reference to the famous P.T. Barnum quote, “There’s a sucker born every minute,” which obviously implied that people who donated money to the Wilson fund were suckers, i.e. unsophisticated dupes.

Then you post:

[quote]Wreckless wrote:
2 the minute you were born.[/quote]

Showing all the reasoning one would expect from an average three-year-old who was located on the “developmentally challenged” end of the bell curve.

Giving you the benefit of the doubt, how would anyone take “2 the minute you were born” and reach the conclusion you meant that I was “stupid enough for two morons”?

To paraphrase another quote from American pop culture, I don’t think that your writing means what you think it means.

But that’s not an unsurprising conclusion, given the evidence of the rest of your posts.

Why don’t you go dunk your head in a nice steaming bowl of Belgian mussels and leave the discussions on U.S. politics for those with a modicum of understanding on the underlying issues? Or at any rate, try not to consume so much Trappist ale prior to posting – it might just make you more coherent.

39

[quote]
BostonBarrister wrote:
Another motive for the filing:

Perhaps they just want to set up an excuse to collect money from the legions of netroots folks:

By all means, please contribute.

There’s one born every minute…

Wreckless wrote:
2 the minute you were born.

BostonBarrister wrote:
Was that supposed to be an insult? Are you somehow implying I’m a twin, and a stupid twin?

What exactly goes on in that little head of yours anyway? Nothing higher order, apparently…

Wreckless wrote:
I was implying you’re stupid enough for 2 morons. If you can’t stand the namecalling, you shouldn’t start it.

Zap Branigan wrote:
Wreckless, you don’t even know the basics of the story.

Your calling BB stupid is laughable.

Perhaps ypu can hire someone to translate the story into Dutch so you can understand it because I know your English comprehension sucks.

Wreckless wrote:
He might be “intelligent” but he’s not smart. He’s a party whore.
He’s supporting the war monger no matter what.[/quote]

Really Wreckless, you’re too comical.

Per usual, your every word betrays your general ignorance. You’ve ignored or dismissed, in your grand omniscience, the arguments destroying the basis for your legal conclusions (yes, labeling someone a “traitor” is a legal conclusion, not to mention your ridiculous assertions on the more specific laws related to this matter). You argue like a typical petulant 3-year-old – all feelings, convinced of with absolute certainty of the fact you’re correct after the adults have explained to you that you’re wrong, in words that generally go over your head – you don’t even attempt to refute the explanation, because you don’t really understand them, except, within the special confines of your own warped reality, in which you’re convinced they’re wrong. And the sky is plaid and the moon is made of green cheese in that special reality too - or whatever you want it to be. It doesn’t matter to actual reality.

Your avatar of Droopy Dog is actually pretty amusing, but it doesn’t really give you an accurate picture. You should really adopt Foghorn Leghorn as your avatar – your discussions with the informed members of this forum generally resemble those of Foghorn Leghorn with the “Eggheaded Boy” in the old WB cartoons, with the typical result of you standing there looking silly and de-feathered after the lightning strike.

40

Wreckless, you don’t even have a clue what logical point I was making, do you?