http://images.t-nation.com/forum_images/./1/.1114325260900.2003-suzuki-s6-d3.jpg
As much as I enjoyed reading 911 girls review, I couldn’t help but be shocked.
I personally own a 2003 SV650S (my first motorcycle). I chose the SV after MUCH research into the matter, and am INCREDIBLY happy with my purchase.
Going back through some of the articles I researched, I picked two for everyone to check out regarding the SV.
http://www.motorcycledaily.com/09april03suzuki2003sv650.htm
http://www.motorcyclistonline.com/roadtests/7k/
All of the reviews point out the great powerplant on the SV, specifically how torquey it was.
I have ridden R6’s and a YZF600, and love those bikes also. Is the SV as fast or underwear staining as the R6, no, and it isn’t built to compete with that class. But the SV is an incredibly fun bike with plenty of power for the street.
While the SV may be down on power to the 600 repli-racers, it makes up in other areas. One reason I love mine is the fact that when I pull in to a parking lot, my bike isn’t the same as 5 other guys. Everyone has an R6 or Gixxer, but I have seen only one other SV in my city. Perhaps an even greater advantage , as I pointed out in my post at the beginning of this thread, is the savings on insurance. I pay $180 per year for my insurance, while my friends with R6’s pay over $150 per month!
As far as the ergonomics go, I can understand where 911girl is coming from. I can imagine the stretch to the bars would be a lot for a woman. I have actually been looking in to raising the bars a little to make longer rides more comfortable.
As far as the SV that 911girl rode, my only thoughts are that it was an older, carbuerated model or that the race exhaust changed the power band a lot to be much higher.
So, is it the best bike out there? No. Is a fun, easy riding, powerful, less expensive motorcycle? YES.
Hope this gives a little more perspective on the never ending motorcycle debate.
Good Riding
Jeff