[quote]deanosumo wrote:
I want to eat my lunch.
From her belly.
With no utensils.
With my hands tied behind my back.
Am I sick?[/quote]
No but I can think of another place on her I’d have no problem eating my lunch from
[quote]Amsterdam Animal wrote:
You guys crack me up. I am 6 "4 and a half and I would make do.[/quote]
I’m with you, man! I’m 6’3" and I’m just not understanding this hate-on for short women. What? You wankers claim to deadlift but can’t manage to bend your frail little backs for a hottie? Fuuuuuuck.
mmhmmm
personally i like short hot chicks, or tall hot chicks i guess too. the point is i like hot chicks!! and she is most definatley a hot chick.
[quote]skarecrow wrote:
the reason they have either no boobs, or fake ones is because they have such a low BF %. incase you didnt know, boobs are fat[/quote]
I’m well aware of that, don’t worry. I was just wondering why hasn’t anyone developed some way to keep the fat in that one bodypart. There has got to be some drug that can lower the fat consumption and some way to keep it within a certain region. It may involve giving shots to the boobies, but I suspect that may be a better way (and a way better look) than the fake balloons
[quote]pushharder wrote:
I have inspected these cheeks relentessly and think they look extraordinarily unweird.[/quote]
Crap, English is my third language among four and a half so I sometimes screw up. I meant the cheekbones… On her FACE. She reminds me of the Golden Eagle
I cannot believe I am doing this but I created an account on the site she is on and am sending her a message now. I wish I could modify my earlier post to this thread. If she does ever come in and post to this site, all of you smucks will owe me!!
AA
[quote]bullpup wrote:
Amsterdam Animal wrote:
I owe you for that site, you made my week man. You ever need anything, let me know, LOL.
She is hot as balls, I have a few of my buddies in the office drooling over her pics right now.
bullpup wrote:
Here’s a link for her, she’s hot.
http://www.kindindustries.com/myProfile.php?UID=2436
I’d hit it. She’s only 5’2" and 105#
Bullpup
I showed her to my wife and she admitted she’d hit it too. She’s sweet and not too far from me. Log into that link I posted and try to draw her on here, I’ll bet she’ll be surprised knowing she has a following of horn dog meatheads drooling over her on a daily basis.
Bullpup[/quote]
[quote]Amsterdam Animal wrote:
I cannot believe I am doing this but I created an account on the site she is on and am sending her a message now. I wish I could modify my earlier post to this thread. If she does ever come in and post to this site, all of you smucks will owe me!!
AA
[/quote]
LOL
[quote]Amsterdam Animal wrote:
I cannot believe I am doing this but I created an account on the site she is on and am sending her a message now. I wish I could modify my earlier post to this thread. If she does ever come in and post to this site, all of you smucks will owe me!!
[/quote]
Naw, man! I’ll just laugh, knowing that you’re turning red because of your prior post! 
I know Dog, wtf was I thinking? But I tell you what, there are some gorgeous chicks on that site, lots of models…hmmm I am thinking next week I may be a famous photographer from Amsterdam looking to do a few riske photo shoots, lets see if I get any takers…LMAO
[quote]TDog305 wrote:
Amsterdam Animal wrote:
I cannot believe I am doing this but I created an account on the site she is on and am sending her a message now. I wish I could modify my earlier post to this thread. If she does ever come in and post to this site, all of you smucks will owe me!!
AA
LOL[/quote]
[quote]Somebody wrote:
I’m well aware of that, don’t worry. I was just wondering why hasn’t anyone developed some way to keep the fat in that one bodypart. [/quote]
That would fall along the lines of “spot reducing” (or in this case, “reverse spot reducing”), which just isn’t physiologically possible.
Look at all the people who try to improve their abs by slaving away at crunches or their hamstrings (particularly women trying to reduce cellulite) by doing set after relentless set of leg presses. Fat isn’t going anywhere without the proper nutrition, but no one can decide where they want it to stay and want it to go. Body fat is just body fat and how it’s distributed for each individual is pretty much strictly genetic.
On another note, I haven’t seen a PI cause this much of a stir in a long time, and I gladly share in the enthusiasm.
Sht, I will just change screen names and avatar or have TC remove that post. Dahum two more hours till the fcking weekend, this day is going so slow. At least my leg day will be off the hook tonight with pictures of Jamie on my mind. Jamie, if you are reading, you are intelligent, educated, sensitive and caring, thats what I like about you, the physique is just an added bonus, lol.
[quote]Northcott wrote:
Amsterdam Animal wrote:
I cannot believe I am doing this but I created an account on the site she is on and am sending her a message now. I wish I could modify my earlier post to this thread. If she does ever come in and post to this site, all of you smucks will owe me!!
Naw, man! I’ll just laugh, knowing that you’re turning red because of your prior post! :D[/quote]
[quote]malonetd wrote:
Soldierslim wrote:
Anybody know her stats?
Last year she batted a league high .387 withs 39 HRs. She also rushed for 1175 yards and 11 touchdowns and had 4 more TDs through the air. She had six hat tricks on the year and averaged a triple-double with 14.6 points 11.2 assists and 10.1 rebounds.[/quote]
Ha! You get 10 TC Funny Points!
im 6’7 and damn, I dunno but I find once a girl hits 5’10, 5’11 there are fewer hot ones after that. my current girl is 5’4 and there is no problem, so all y’all should simma down. This girl is stunning…
[quote]malonetd wrote:
Soldierslim wrote:
Anybody know her stats?
Last year she batted a league high .387 withs 39 HRs. She also rushed for 1175 yards and 11 touchdowns and had 4 more TDs through the air. She had six hat tricks on the year and averaged a triple-double with 14.6 points 11.2 assists and 10.1 rebounds.[/quote]
Any DPs???
DB
Hmm, looks like my post with some extra info didn’t go through (might just do with the jumpy net connection here ), but anyhow. Here’s an illustration of what seemed weird about the cheekbones - on the left the original, on the right a (subjective to me, of course) more appealing version
[quote]CC wrote:
Somebody wrote:
I’m well aware of that, don’t worry. I was just wondering why hasn’t anyone developed some way to keep the fat in that one bodypart.
That would fall along the lines of “spot reducing” (or in this case, “reverse spot reducing”), which just isn’t physiologically possible.
Look at all the people who try to improve their abs by slaving away at crunches or their hamstrings (particularly women trying to reduce cellulite) by doing set after relentless set of leg presses. Fat isn’t going anywhere without the proper nutrition, but no one can decide where they want it to stay and want it to go. Body fat is just body fat and how it’s distributed for each individual is pretty much strictly genetic.[/quote]
Well, I was talking about regional prevention of fat absorption by using chemicals, etc
Anyhow, looks like in the near future the crazy bubbles may be replaced by something more natural: http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn7028
One has to wonder, though if the new ones would get absorbed just as easily as regular fat. Since they talk about controlled growth perhaps there would be a way to have fit women with awesome, shapely breasts… One may dream, eh?
[quote]dollarbill44 wrote:
malonetd wrote:
Soldierslim wrote:
Anybody know her stats?
Last year she batted a league high .387 withs 39 HRs. She also rushed for 1175 yards and 11 touchdowns and had 4 more TDs through the air. She had six hat tricks on the year and averaged a triple-double with 14.6 points 11.2 assists and 10.1 rebounds.
Any DPs???
DB[/quote]
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
[quote]Somebody wrote:
Hmm, looks like my post with some extra info didn’t go through (might just do with the jumpy net connection here ), but anyhow. Here’s an illustration of what seemed weird about the cheekbones - on the right the original, on the left a (subjective to me, of course) more appealing version[/quote]
So you made her cheeks wider??
So you like fat chicks with chubby cheeks?
[quote]rrjc5488 wrote:
Somebody wrote:
Hmm, looks like my post with some extra info didn’t go through (might just do with the jumpy net connection here ), but anyhow. Here’s an illustration of what seemed weird about the cheekbones - on the right the original, on the left a (subjective to me, of course) more appealing version
So you made her cheeks wider??
So you like fat chicks with chubby cheeks?[/quote]
Aw, fuck, switched LEFT and RIGHT. On the left the original creepy cheeks, on the right my remix with gentler lines. I better edit that post…
One thing I will say is that every single one of Johnny Crosslin’s pictures are airbrushed/digitally enhanced out the ass. It’s ridiculously obvious if you’ve seen a lot of his work. You’d be amazed at some of the things photographers do to a picture. There’s one website (sorry, I can’t find the link) where you can view before/afters, and one picture in particular of Vida Guerra has her ass made to look bigger and for some unknown reason her foot was moved, lol. It’s quite eye-opening.
That being said, even the (seemingly) untouched photos of this girl are stunning. She’s got it all, no way around it.
EDIT: Found that website -
http://www.glennferon.com/portfolio1/index.html
Vida is second from the left on the top. Play around with that site awhile, it’ll blow you away. Will definitely make you appreciate “real” girls more…