[quote]Aggv wrote:
My point was that it’s completely trivial and pointless for people to be opposed to gay rights.
[/quote]
My thoughts are if a politician is too ignorant to not support something as simple as gay rights then any other policies they have lose credibility also.
[quote]Aggv wrote:
My point was that it’s completely trivial and pointless for people to be opposed to gay rights.
[/quote]
What “rights” are homosexuals being denied? Do you mean positive rights or negative rights?
I think that too many politicians feel that they should voice there stance on whatever subject is being discussed rather than saying something like ‘as an elected official, that is outside of my authority’.
[quote]sufiandy wrote:
[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
[quote]Neuromancer wrote:
Watch the Western World collapse…oh…wait. Guess not.[/quote]It has been since the 60’s. In case you haven’t noticed.
[/quote]
I blame women entering the workforce. Saudi Arabia does not have the same problems we do.[/quote]
You’re observations are unfounded.
[quote]optheta wrote:
Officially backed by Obama.
[/quote]
No surprise there…
[quote]Aggv wrote:
I really dont understand why people get so upset over trivial issues like gay marriage, but yet say nothing on issues that actually effect daily life.
Barry Obama still sucks… [/quote]
Please, give us a list things that effect daily life.
[quote]pushharder wrote:
Heeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeere we go again:
Tell me why Bam should not reinforce his reasoning behind his gay marriage stand by emphasizing that he also supports a man being able to marry two women at the same time.
Or for that matter a man being able to marry two men.
Or three.
Or one hundred fifty nine.
After all according to the “evolved” one, “The thing at root that we think about is, not only Christ sacrificing himself on our behalf, but it’s also the golden rule? you know, treat others the way you would want to be treated,’ he said. 'And I think that’s what we try to impart to our kids, and that’s what motivates me as president.”
So if he wants to invoke the Golden Rule to support gay marriage shouldn’t he also invoke it to support my hypothetical desire to marry two women?
Or three?
Or one hundred fifty nine?[/quote]
WHOA WHOA PUSH lets not stop there, i mean what if a man wanted to marry a horse?!?! Or even 2 or 3 horses?
Your reasoning is fucken solid, keep at it push.
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
Please, give us a list things that effect daily life.[/quote]
Read my above post, im saying it’s stupid for ppl to be opposed to gay rights.
Things people should get worked over include immigration, energy policies, economic policies, and our wars; not whether gays can visit each other in hospitals and file joint tax returns.
The sanctity of marriage…
lol
He’s Kenyan i believe, but who cars; Barry the Bastard sucks.
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
[quote]optheta wrote:
Officially backed by Obama.
[/quote]
No surprise there…[/quote]
I like the way Barry is slamming him in the back side 
Eye roll
I was under the impression that enjoying significant tax, employment, government, medical, estate and death benefits without providing the reciprocal compensation of a socially favored nuclear family unit, social stability, and the children to further stabilize the above mentioned society and fund it via their own taxation, was indeed something that affected me and the rest of society.
I should probably just shut my bigoted hole, though.
[quote]pushharder wrote:
Heeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeere we go again:
Tell me why Bam should not reinforce his reasoning behind his gay marriage stand by emphasizing that he also supports a man being able to marry two women at the same time.
Or for that matter a man being able to marry two men.
Or three.
Or one hundred fifty nine.
After all according to the “evolved” one, “The thing at root that we think about is, not only Christ sacrificing himself on our behalf, but it’s also the golden rule? you know, treat others the way you would want to be treated,’ he said. 'And I think that’s what we try to impart to our kids, and that’s what motivates me as president.”
So if he wants to invoke the Golden Rule to support gay marriage shouldn’t he also invoke it to support my hypothetical desire to marry two women?
Or three?
Or one hundred fifty nine?[/quote]
Once again you make sense only to your self
Its funny all the republicans say whenever the issue of gay marriage comes up is “We have better things to talk about!”.
What a joke.
Is there anything about gay marriage in the constitution?
[quote]Cortes wrote:
I was under the impression that enjoying significant tax, employment, government, medical, estate and death benefits without providing the reciprocal compensation of a socially favored nuclear family unit, social stability, and the children to further stabilize the above mentioned society and fund it via their own taxation, was indeed something that affected me and the rest of society.
I should probably just shut my bigoted hole, though. [/quote]Please do. You’ve way overstepped your bounds. I sent you something BTW.