Obama Backs WTC Mosque

[quote]Chushin wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

Sob stories?

They torture and detain people of umlcear status indefinitely without access to a tribunal to determine their status.

Viola, they violate the Geneva convention and therefore, according to your argument resistance to their occupation is a-ok.

Second, what does it matter what Austrians thought?

I thought that the only important thing is what our masters in Washington decree and they, in their infinite wisdom, peace be upon them, declared us to be the Nazis first victim.

Just because some lowly Austrians thought otherwise hardly matters, the oracle by the Potomac has spoken and for you that is the final word.

Cant have it both ways, can you?

[/quote]

Wow.

Odorous even for you, Franz.

Even for you.[/quote]

What you are smelling is the stink of his arguments.

I am just working through some of his ideas.

[quote]phaethon wrote:
B) Simply because people attach certain connotations to words doesn’t change their objective value.
[/quote]

Hm. I’m going to have to mull this one over for a little while. My initial response is to disagree, but I just woke up so its hard to think.

By the way, thank you for the actual debate and lack of insults.

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Sifu wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Sifu wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Sifu wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Sifu wrote:

[quote]Dustin wrote:

[quote]phaethon wrote:

[quote]Dustin wrote:

[quote]Sifu wrote:

Sob stories?

They torture and detain people of umlcear status indefinitely without access to a tribunal to determine their status.

Viola, they violate the Geneva convention and therefore, according to your argument resistance to their occupation is a-ok.

Second, what does it matter what Austrians thought?

I thought that the only important thing is what our masters in Washington decree and they, in their infinite wisdom, peace be upon them, declared us to be the Nazis first victim.

Just because some lowly Austrians thought otherwise hardly matters, the oracle by the Potomac has spoken and for you that is the final word.

Cant have it both ways, can you?

[/quote]

Yes sob stories. Because I just knew you were going to come and cry us a river about Guantanamo and you have.

Under the Geneva convention combatants caught out of uniform dressed as civilians can be classified as spies or saboteurs and executed. So how does that figure into your reasoning or doesn’t it?

Your cries of torture and indefinite detention are hypocritical considering what can happen to civilians accused of crimes in your country and the rest of Europe!

How were Austrians a victim of the nazis when they were happy to become part of the third reich?

[quote]Sifu wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Sifu wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Sifu wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Sifu wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Sifu wrote:

[quote]Dustin wrote:

[quote]phaethon wrote:

[quote]Dustin wrote:

[quote]Sifu wrote:

Sob stories?

They torture and detain people of umlcear status indefinitely without access to a tribunal to determine their status.

Viola, they violate the Geneva convention and therefore, according to your argument resistance to their occupation is a-ok.

Second, what does it matter what Austrians thought?

I thought that the only important thing is what our masters in Washington decree and they, in their infinite wisdom, peace be upon them, declared us to be the Nazis first victim.

Just because some lowly Austrians thought otherwise hardly matters, the oracle by the Potomac has spoken and for you that is the final word.

Cant have it both ways, can you?

[/quote]

Yes sob stories. Because I just knew you were going to come and cry us a river about Guantanamo and you have.

Under the Geneva convention combatants caught out of uniform dressed as civilians can be classified as spies or saboteurs and executed. So how does that figure into your reasoning or doesn’t it?

Your cries of torture and indefinite detention are hypocritical considering what can happen to civilians accused of crimes in your country and the rest of Europe!

How were Austrians a victim of the nazis when they were happy to become part of the third reich?
[/quote]

The US said so, so we were ze Victimz!.

That is enough for you on any occasion, so why dig deeper now?

Then, the Geneva Convention calls for procedures to determine the status of a prisoner and not for a re-labeling as “unlawful combatants”, the toothfairy or whatever else an US administration draws out of its ass.

Also, prisoners were not only tortured in Guantanamo but also in Abu Ghareib and several other locations, not to mention the countless abuses of the Iraqui civilians by mercenaries hired by American firms that were exempt from prosecution under local as well as military law by guess who, yes! the American government.

So I guess we can at least agree that butchering Blackwater type soldiers is totally ok?

Orion what is wrong with torturing a soldier, a soldier knows the risk of potential war. Listen first of all during the second invasion the bombs where awe and shock dumbasses. Some people where killed but we only bombed bases. I remember we would bomb a base and go in 3 hrs later only to find a few stragglers behind telling us that the base was abandoned.

I can tell you some torture stories but you guys would kill me, but what you guys fail to recognize is why they are tortured. I am telling you during the bombings they where not as many deaths as is perceived. Im just amazed at how the liberals have brainwashed you. Unlike some people I recognize that is an evil but necessary act. Someones got to do it.

[quote]jre67t wrote:
Orion what is wrong with torturing a soldier, a soldier knows the risk of potential war. Listen first of all during the second invasion the bombs where awe and shock dumbasses. Some people where killed but we only bombed bases. I remember we would bomb a base and go in 3 hrs later only to find a few stragglers behind telling us that the base was abandoned.

I can tell you some torture stories but you guys would kill me, but what you guys fail to recognize is why they are tortured. I am telling you during the bombings they where not as many deaths as is perceived. Im just amazed at how the liberals have brainwashed you. Unlike some people I recognize that is an evil but necessary act. Someones got to do it. [/quote]

The pros and cons of torture were not the point, his point was that the US were following the Geneva Convention which is why their occupation is just swell.

Now even if I accepted that line of reasoning, which I do not do, it would still be wrong, because torturing people is most definitely a violation of the Geneva Convention.

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]jre67t wrote:
Orion what is wrong with torturing a soldier, a soldier knows the risk of potential war. Listen first of all during the second invasion the bombs where awe and shock dumbasses. Some people where killed but we only bombed bases. I remember we would bomb a base and go in 3 hrs later only to find a few stragglers behind telling us that the base was abandoned.

I can tell you some torture stories but you guys would kill me, but what you guys fail to recognize is why they are tortured. I am telling you during the bombings they where not as many deaths as is perceived. Im just amazed at how the liberals have brainwashed you. Unlike some people I recognize that is an evil but necessary act. Someones got to do it. [/quote]

The pros and cons of torture were not the point, his point was that the US were following the Geneva Convention which is why their occupation is just swell. [/quote]

Now you are trying to put words into my mouth. I have not said that what happened with Iraq is just swell. I am merely being an adult about the situation and accepting that what happened was a necessary evil that in the greater scheme of things was the best solution for everyone involved.

Without a neutral party fourth party like the American army coming in to take control and keep people from going at each other the loss of life would have been much greater because overthrowing Saddam would have turned into a three way civil war.

America did the Iraqi people a favor just like how America did your country a favor! Which I suspect is the true source of your indignation. It bothers you that it was Americans who cleared your grandparents mess, because they didn’t have the balls to take responsibility for themselves and clean up their own mess. Now America has done it for someone else you want to use it as an opportunity to discredit the favors America has done for mankind.

Instead of pissing and moaning about what America has done to people who are participants in the ongoing overseas contingency you should take a look closer to home. The harsh interrogation techniques used by the US against unlawful combatants who are subject to execution are no worse than those used by some European police forces against civilians. While the uniform code of military justice that trials of accused terrorists are being conducted under gives much greater protections to defendants than some European countries legal systems.

So you definitely should look closer to home because your government has agreed to make it’s citizens vulnerable to those interrogation techniques and unfair legal practices without any legal recourse.

Orion the US and UK are the only countries that actually follow the Geneva rules. We follow them and that could be the reason why we are still there. If we just went in and did what we are supposed to do. Then maybe we would not be in this situation.

[quote]jre67t wrote:
Orion the US and UK are the only countries that actually follow the Geneva rules. We follow them and that could be the reason why we are still there. If we just went in and did what we are supposed to do. Then maybe we would not be in this situation.

[/quote]

No, it would be worse.

Not only could you not pacify them short of a genocide, it would also rip your country apart, because the military can only siphon money from the US economy as long as there is an almost instinctive, mindless veneration of the US military.

In a way you are a slave to your own narrative.

Then, the US only follows the Geneva Convention if one believes the Us government which I find increasingly hard to do.

Sigh, Orion it could also be better. I once considered myself a pacifist but somewhere along the lines I change my mind. I see that we are one of the only countries in the world with a high standard and we usually follow the majority of the rules. I get what you are saying in one being a slave to his own narrative but it applies to you as well.
I just do not get the mentality you have. Its not like we run around killing babies like liberals support abortions. Its not like we hate muslims we hate that they are spitting in the face of every American for building this site on Sacred grounds. Let me build a Christian or Jewish or Budaism church within 2 blocks of Mecca. If we allow this mosque it will be the tipping point. Do you not at least agree at how insensitive it is to us?
In a way I hope they build it because I can promise you that America will change for Americas better not the worlds. Lets stop appeasing the minority they are a minority for a reason my friend.1

[quote]Chushin wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

Sob stories?

They torture and detain people of umlcear status indefinitely without access to a tribunal to determine their status.

Viola, they violate the Geneva convention and therefore, according to your argument resistance to their occupation is a-ok.

Second, what does it matter what Austrians thought?

I thought that the only important thing is what our masters in Washington decree and they, in their infinite wisdom, peace be upon them, declared us to be the Nazis first victim.

Just because some lowly Austrians thought otherwise hardly matters, the oracle by the Potomac has spoken and for you that is the final word.

Cant have it both ways, can you?

[/quote]

Wow.

Odorous even for you, Franz.

Even for you.[/quote]

Odorous and odious.

Orion, when he lacks a fact to showcase his bigoted rubbish, relies on the rhetorical devices of false choices or false comparisons. There is simply no reason to be falsely trapped by this crap, since no, the US is not like the German-Austrian state, dedicated as it was from top to bottom uniquely and irreversibly to genocide.

But there are sometimes things he writes which cannot stand unexamined; for example, that it was the US which called Austria “the first victim.” History speaks clearly of Austrians’ role in WWII; they did not then consider themselves victims, but were joyful perpetrators–at every level–in the genocides of that war. Wherefrom, then, the planned denial of “first victimhood?”

The crime continued in that generation in the form of denial of the truth, and the lies perpetrated by the Germans and Austrians that they were innocent victims, that the Wehrmacht had “clean hands,” and so forth. It was the Germans and the Austrians themselves who invented the lie of “first victim.” Where the US–and Britain, in the Declaration of Moscow–are to be faulted is in the acquiescence to this lie, and particularly in the failure to pursue the truth because lies were so much more conducive to the reconstruction of Europe (not Germany alone), especially in the face of Soviet threat.

(The nature of orion’s lie is fully evaluated, generation by generation, by Wolfram Wette The Wehrmacht: History, Myth, Reality, a title he will find curiously translated from Die Wehrmacht–Feindbilder , vernichtungskrieg, legenden)

It is simply perverse–leave alone inaccurate–for orion to claim that Someone in Washington unilaterally declared Austria to be a victim. But it also follows his general manner of discourse. He, too, believes and promulgates the lies, or uses them because it is so much more convenient to do so than to face the historical truth. (Now, that is being a slave to one’s own narrative.) And so it is from one generation to the next.

[quote]DrSkeptix wrote:

[quote]Chushin wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

Sob stories?

They torture and detain people of umlcear status indefinitely without access to a tribunal to determine their status.

Viola, they violate the Geneva convention and therefore, according to your argument resistance to their occupation is a-ok.

Second, what does it matter what Austrians thought?

I thought that the only important thing is what our masters in Washington decree and they, in their infinite wisdom, peace be upon them, declared us to be the Nazis first victim.

Just because some lowly Austrians thought otherwise hardly matters, the oracle by the Potomac has spoken and for you that is the final word.

Cant have it both ways, can you?

[/quote]

Wow.

Odorous even for you, Franz.

Even for you.[/quote]

Odorous and odious.

Orion, when he lacks a fact to showcase his bigoted rubbish, relies on the rhetorical devices of false choices or false comparisons. There is simply no reason to be falsely trapped by this crap, since no, the US is not like the German-Austrian state, dedicated as it was from top to bottom uniquely and irreversibly to genocide.

But there are sometimes things he writes which cannot stand unexamined; for example, that it was the US which called Austria “the first victim.” History speaks clearly of Austrians’ role in WWII; they did not then consider themselves victims, but were joyful perpetrators–at every level–in the genocides of that war. Wherefrom, then, the planned denial of “first victimhood?”

The crime continued in that generation in the form of denial of the truth, and the lies perpetrated by the Germans and Austrians that they were innocent victims, that the Wehrmacht had “clean hands,” and so forth. It was the Germans and the Austrians themselves who invented the lie of “first victim.” Where the US–and Britain, in the Declaration of Moscow–are to be faulted is in the acquiescence to this lie, and particularly in the failure to pursue the truth because lies were so much more conducive to the reconstruction of Europe (not Germany alone), especially in the face of Soviet threat.

(The nature of orion’s lie is fully evaluated, generation by generation, by Wolfram Wette The Wehrmacht: History, Myth, Reality, a title he will find curiously translated from Die Wehrmacht–Feindbilder , vernichtungskrieg, legenden)

It is simply perverse–leave alone inaccurate–for orion to claim that Someone in Washington unilaterally declared Austria to be a victim. But it also follows his general manner of discourse. He, too, believes and promulgates the lies, or uses them because it is so much more convenient to do so than to face the historical truth. (Now, that is being a slave to one’s own narrative.) And so it is from one generation to the next.

[/quote]

Wow, allmost all of this is wrong, except for the part where Austria happily went along with that myth for a period sfter WWII.

The rest is ignorant rubish.

Anyhow, so we have established that the US government does lie when it is politically expedient and that was all I was trying to show, so I guess Sifus stance is pretty much finished now .

They lied then, they lie now, they will lie in the future so their word is worth nothing.

Thanks for playing.

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Sifu wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Sifu wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Sifu wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Sifu wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Sifu wrote:

[quote]Dustin wrote:

[quote]phaethon wrote:

[quote]Dustin wrote:

[quote]Sifu wrote:

Sob stories?

They torture and detain people of umlcear status indefinitely without access to a tribunal to determine their status.

Viola, they violate the Geneva convention and therefore, according to your argument resistance to their occupation is a-ok.

Second, what does it matter what Austrians thought?

I thought that the only important thing is what our masters in Washington decree and they, in their infinite wisdom, peace be upon them, declared us to be the Nazis first victim.

Just because some lowly Austrians thought otherwise hardly matters, the oracle by the Potomac has spoken and for you that is the final word.

Cant have it both ways, can you?

[/quote]

Yes sob stories. Because I just knew you were going to come and cry us a river about Guantanamo and you have.

Under the Geneva convention combatants caught out of uniform dressed as civilians can be classified as spies or saboteurs and executed. So how does that figure into your reasoning or doesn’t it?

Your cries of torture and indefinite detention are hypocritical considering what can happen to civilians accused of crimes in your country and the rest of Europe!

How were Austrians a victim of the nazis when they were happy to become part of the third reich?
[/quote]

The US said so, so we were ze Victimz!.

That is enough for you on any occasion, so why dig deeper now?

Then, the Geneva Convention calls for procedures to determine the status of a prisoner and not for a re-labeling as “unlawful combatants”, the toothfairy or whatever else an US administration draws out of its ass.

Also, prisoners were not only tortured in Guantanamo but also in Abu Ghareib and several other locations, not to mention the countless abuses of the Iraqui civilians by mercenaries hired by American firms that were exempt from prosecution under local as well as military law by guess who, yes! the American government.

So I guess we can at least agree that butchering Blackwater type soldiers is totally ok?

[/quote]

So tell us who and when someone in the US said Austria was a victim of the Nazis? Hitler was Austrian, so it’s not like you were being led by a foreigner. For all your pissing and moaning like a little bitch, America’s reign as the number one power has been much more benign than what we would have if Austrians had won either of the last two world wars.

Well if the term unlawful combatant is so offensive to your sensibilities how about this solution? We go back to the definitions of the good old days, call them spies or saboteurs then take them out and shoot them at dawn! Will that mollify your sensitivities?

People were criminally charged over what happened at Abu Ghraib. Also there are Algerians at Guantanamo who didn’t want to go back to their homeland because they will be tortured for real. You are greatly overstating just how badly America is treating people by calling the roughing up of terrorists torture. ie All the prisoners at Guantanamo still have all their fingernails and toenails, which is more is more than they would have if they were in an Egyptian prison because the Egyptians don’t play. What has been done at Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib is far nicer than what has been done to our people by them.

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]DrSkeptix wrote:

[quote]Chushin wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

Sob stories?

They torture and detain people of umlcear status indefinitely without access to a tribunal to determine their status.

Viola, they violate the Geneva convention and therefore, according to your argument resistance to their occupation is a-ok.

Second, what does it matter what Austrians thought?

I thought that the only important thing is what our masters in Washington decree and they, in their infinite wisdom, peace be upon them, declared us to be the Nazis first victim.

Just because some lowly Austrians thought otherwise hardly matters, the oracle by the Potomac has spoken and for you that is the final word.

Cant have it both ways, can you?

[/quote]

Wow.

Odorous even for you, Franz.

Even for you.[/quote]

Odorous and odious.

Orion, when he lacks a fact to showcase his bigoted rubbish, relies on the rhetorical devices of false choices or false comparisons. There is simply no reason to be falsely trapped by this crap, since no, the US is not like the German-Austrian state, dedicated as it was from top to bottom uniquely and irreversibly to genocide.

But there are sometimes things he writes which cannot stand unexamined; for example, that it was the US which called Austria “the first victim.” History speaks clearly of Austrians’ role in WWII; they did not then consider themselves victims, but were joyful perpetrators–at every level–in the genocides of that war. Wherefrom, then, the planned denial of “first victimhood?”

The crime continued in that generation in the form of denial of the truth, and the lies perpetrated by the Germans and Austrians that they were innocent victims, that the Wehrmacht had “clean hands,” and so forth. It was the Germans and the Austrians themselves who invented the lie of “first victim.” Where the US–and Britain, in the Declaration of Moscow–are to be faulted is in the acquiescence to this lie, and particularly in the failure to pursue the truth because lies were so much more conducive to the reconstruction of Europe (not Germany alone), especially in the face of Soviet threat.

(The nature of orion’s lie is fully evaluated, generation by generation, by Wolfram Wette The Wehrmacht: History, Myth, Reality, a title he will find curiously translated from Die Wehrmacht–Feindbilder , vernichtungskrieg, legenden)

It is simply perverse–leave alone inaccurate–for orion to claim that Someone in Washington unilaterally declared Austria to be a victim. But it also follows his general manner of discourse. He, too, believes and promulgates the lies, or uses them because it is so much more convenient to do so than to face the historical truth. (Now, that is being a slave to one’s own narrative.) And so it is from one generation to the next.

[/quote]

Wow, allmost all of this is wrong, except for the part where Austria happily went along with that myth for a period sfter WWII.

The rest is ignorant rubish.

Anyhow, so we have established that the US government does lie when it is politically expedient and that was all I was trying to show, so I guess Sifus stance is pretty much finished now .

They lied then, they lie now, they will lie in the future so their word is worth nothing.

Thanks for playing.

[/quote]

DrSkeptix as usual has brought some wisdom to this discussion. If anyone is a slave to their own narrative it is you Orion. All through this the narrative you have tried to push down our throats is that the US is this horrible bully, our horrible military tortures people and horrible Americans venerate all of this.

For a long time now you have had a singular objective to make it appear as if America and Americans are just as bad or even worse than the all time world champion of bad behavior, Austrians.

You keep on trying to drag us down to the level of your people and I am not going to quietly go along with it because your self serving comparisons are bullshit. Because there is no comparison. What your people did at Auschwitz. That was genocide. What your people at Auschwitz called “medical research”. That was torture. Your grandparents knowing what the wehrmacht and SS were doing and not speaking out against it. That was veneration of the military in a way that Americans have never done.

You saying what is going on in Guantanamo is torture is to make a comparison to what your people did at Auschwitz when there is no comparison, it is not even close.

It is easy for you to sit back and talk shit about what we are doing to try and protect ourselves, when all you have to do is remind the jihadists that Hitler was your guy, you did your part to rid the world of Jews and you would have succeeded if it wasn’t for the evil Americans thwarting your plans.

You may be able to play the innocent victim card on naive kids who know nothing of history, but that isn’t going to work with those of us who know the history. The terrorist groups that we are having problems with now are direct descendants of groups and people who were supported by Hitler.

In the 1930’s Egypt’s muslim brotherhood aligned itself with the third reich and received support from it. The muslim brotherhood is where Iman Zawahiri got his start.

Amin Al-Husseini the grand mufti of Jerusalem was one of Hitlers best friends. His nephew who he raised was Yasser Arafat.

Rashid Al-Qailani was Amin Al-Husseini right hand man in Iraq who in 1941 helped Al-Husseini instigate a pro nazi coup in Iraq. Rashid Al-Qailani’ nephew and future son in law who he raised was Saddam Hussein. This I think is the real source of Orion’s indignation over Saddam getting taken out. Saddam was the beneficiary of a power structure whose lineage went directly back to Der Fuhrer. When we took out Saddam we took out one of the last vestiges of the third reich.

Admit it Orion, it really bothers you to see your grandparents work undone.

[quote]Sifu wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]DrSkeptix wrote:

[quote]Chushin wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

Sob stories?

They torture and detain people of umlcear status indefinitely without access to a tribunal to determine their status.

Viola, they violate the Geneva convention and therefore, according to your argument resistance to their occupation is a-ok.

Second, what does it matter what Austrians thought?

I thought that the only important thing is what our masters in Washington decree and they, in their infinite wisdom, peace be upon them, declared us to be the Nazis first victim.

Just because some lowly Austrians thought otherwise hardly matters, the oracle by the Potomac has spoken and for you that is the final word.

Cant have it both ways, can you?

[/quote]

Wow.

Odorous even for you, Franz.

Even for you.[/quote]

Odorous and odious.

Orion, when he lacks a fact to showcase his bigoted rubbish, relies on the rhetorical devices of false choices or false comparisons. There is simply no reason to be falsely trapped by this crap, since no, the US is not like the German-Austrian state, dedicated as it was from top to bottom uniquely and irreversibly to genocide.

But there are sometimes things he writes which cannot stand unexamined; for example, that it was the US which called Austria “the first victim.” History speaks clearly of Austrians’ role in WWII; they did not then consider themselves victims, but were joyful perpetrators–at every level–in the genocides of that war. Wherefrom, then, the planned denial of “first victimhood?”

The crime continued in that generation in the form of denial of the truth, and the lies perpetrated by the Germans and Austrians that they were innocent victims, that the Wehrmacht had “clean hands,” and so forth. It was the Germans and the Austrians themselves who invented the lie of “first victim.” Where the US–and Britain, in the Declaration of Moscow–are to be faulted is in the acquiescence to this lie, and particularly in the failure to pursue the truth because lies were so much more conducive to the reconstruction of Europe (not Germany alone), especially in the face of Soviet threat.

(The nature of orion’s lie is fully evaluated, generation by generation, by Wolfram Wette The Wehrmacht: History, Myth, Reality, a title he will find curiously translated from Die Wehrmacht–Feindbilder , vernichtungskrieg, legenden)

It is simply perverse–leave alone inaccurate–for orion to claim that Someone in Washington unilaterally declared Austria to be a victim. But it also follows his general manner of discourse. He, too, believes and promulgates the lies, or uses them because it is so much more convenient to do so than to face the historical truth. (Now, that is being a slave to one’s own narrative.) And so it is from one generation to the next.

[/quote]

Wow, allmost all of this is wrong, except for the part where Austria happily went along with that myth for a period sfter WWII.

The rest is ignorant rubish.

Anyhow, so we have established that the US government does lie when it is politically expedient and that was all I was trying to show, so I guess Sifus stance is pretty much finished now .

They lied then, they lie now, they will lie in the future so their word is worth nothing.

Thanks for playing.

[/quote]

DrSkeptix as usual has brought some wisdom to this discussion. If anyone is a slave to their own narrative it is you Orion. All through this the narrative you have tried to push down our throats is that the US is this horrible bully, our horrible military tortures people and horrible Americans venerate all of this.

For a long time now you have had a singular objective to make it appear as if America and Americans are just as bad or even worse than the all time world champion of bad behavior, Austrians.

You keep on trying to drag us down to the level of your people and I am not going to quietly go along with it because your self serving comparisons are bullshit. Because there is no comparison. What your people did at Auschwitz. That was genocide. What your people at Auschwitz called “medical research”. That was torture. Your grandparents knowing what the wehrmacht and SS were doing and not speaking out against it. That was veneration of the military in a way that Americans have never done.

You saying what is going on in Guantanamo is torture is to make a comparison to what your people did at Auschwitz when there is no comparison, it is not even close.

It is easy for you to sit back and talk shit about what we are doing to try and protect ourselves, when all you have to do is remind the jihadists that Hitler was your guy, you did your part to rid the world of Jews and you would have succeeded if it wasn’t for the evil Americans thwarting your plans.

You may be able to play the innocent victim card on naive kids who know nothing of history, but that isn’t going to work with those of us who know the history. The terrorist groups that we are having problems with now are direct descendants of groups and people who were supported by Hitler.

In the 1930’s Egypt’s muslim brotherhood aligned itself with the third reich and received support from it. The muslim brotherhood is where Iman Zawahiri got his start.

Amin Al-Husseini the grand mufti of Jerusalem was one of Hitlers best friends. His nephew who he raised was Yasser Arafat.

Rashid Al-Qailani was Amin Al-Husseini right hand man in Iraq who in 1941 helped Al-Husseini instigate a pro nazi coup in Iraq. Rashid Al-Qailani’ nephew and future son in law who he raised was Saddam Hussein. This I think is the real source of Orion’s indignation over Saddam getting taken out. Saddam was the beneficiary of a power structure whose lineage went directly back to Der Fuhrer. When we took out Saddam we took out one of the last vestiges of the third reich.

Admit it Orion, it really bothers you to see your grandparents work undone. [/quote]

So let us do that bit by bit:

He claims that Austria is in denial when it comes to our role in WWII.

We are not. I just brought up that the US claims a lot of shit when it is politically expedient to do so.

He claimed that Germans and Austrians invented the story that we were the first victim of Germany.

The Germnans had no incentive to do that and it was first claimed at Yalta were the Austrians were obviously not invited even though we happily went along wit hit after WWII.

Insofar his other points were also complete nonsense because he tries to refute points that I never made.

I cannot argue with someone who responds to the voices in his head.

As to your post.

Not once have I posted that the US s actions are similar to that of the Nazis.

I do however claim that a lot of the techniques the Nazis used are used on the US population to goad them into war over and over again.

Not once have I claimed that what happened in Abu Ghareib is comparable in magnitude or intend to what happened in Auschwitz I have pointed out however that that is no excuse for what is happening all around the world RIGHT NOW.

Also, when I should ever encounter someone on this board who knows enough about German or Austrian history I would not have to draw the parallels that do exist because they are glaringly obvious.

(…)the Kingdom Foundation, al-Waleed’s personal charity, has donated a total of $305,000 to Muslim Leaders of Tomorrow, a leadership and networking project sponsored jointly by two of Rauf’s organizations, the American Society for Muslim Advancement and the Cordoba Initiative. Al-Waleed owns a 7 percent, $2.3 billion stake in News Corporation. Likewise, News Corporation owns a 9 percent, $70 million stake â?? purchased in February â?? in Rotana, Al-Waleed’s Saudi media conglomerate. Put another way: Rupert Murdoch and Fox News are in business, to the tune of billions of dollars, with one of the “Terror Mosque Imam’s” principal patrons.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_upshot/20100820/bs_yblog_upshot/news-corps-number-two-shareholder-funded-terror-mosque-planner

…was this posted before? If so, i apologise for the repost.

When orion is depleted of logic, or history, or meaningful experience, the ratio of sarcastic insult to facts rises.

First, for someone who professes deep knowledge of Austrian and European history, he is ignorant. Even with the clue I provided, the Austrian myth of “first victimhood” was NOT derived from Yalta, but from the Moscow Declaration of 1943, in which the US was subject to the will of England and the USSR. (China was present; France was not.) The US acquiesced in this.

Second, orion dissembles. He HAS compared Nazi governance with the US, a position I have decried memorably, since I find such comparisons to be disguised apologies for the inexcusable. He again dissembles in his sarcastic post to Sifu.

Last, at least the “rubbish” I write is documented and annotated, whereas the “rubish” he writes is the argument that he has with “the voices in his head,” in his term. I write of The Lie of post-war Germany and Austria, not to excuse the US of acquiescence, but to underscore how lies are perpetuated, and to whose benefit. Orion is simply the willing vessel of the current version of The Lie, that it is all the US’s fault (“the US said so”), and by doing so he confirms this European generation’s over-eager blindness.

In context–WTC, mosque or no, Iraq–my positive appeal is that we as Americans ferret out the truth and the lies. Because, as history reflects, we are the most self-critical and self-examining society…ever.

.

[quote]Jewbacca wrote:
.[/quote]