[quote]print wrote:
[quote]farmerson12 wrote:
[quote]print wrote:
^ Son! You disappoint.[/quote]
Pfff. Old man, you like sucky QBs and teams. Jets? Pfff. Marinovich? Pff. [/quote]
Would I be mistaken if I say that both of our teams have the exact same record?[/quote]
Exact number of Super Bowl wins also.
Prior to Super bowl does not count
Edit was fucking with you and then you put up the real stats.
Damn
[quote]farmerson12 wrote:
[quote]print wrote:
[quote]farmerson12 wrote:
[quote]print wrote:
^ Son! You disappoint.[/quote]
Pfff. Old man, you like sucky QBs and teams. Jets? Pfff. Marinovich? Pff. [/quote]
Would I be mistaken if I say that both of our teams have the exact same record?[/quote]
History grandpa Print. Histoy.
Jets- 1 Superbowl victory
Packers- 4 plus more championships than any other team(pre SB era) with 13 total
[/quote]
I refuse to live in the past grasshopper. It’s all about being in the now. & as of rt NOW, we be the same, you lil cocksucker.
[quote]print wrote:
[quote]farmerson12 wrote:
[quote]print wrote:
[quote]farmerson12 wrote:
[quote]print wrote:
^ Son! You disappoint.[/quote]
Pfff. Old man, you like sucky QBs and teams. Jets? Pfff. Marinovich? Pff. [/quote]
Would I be mistaken if I say that both of our teams have the exact same record?[/quote]
History grandpa Print. Histoy.
Jets- 1 Superbowl victory
Packers- 4 plus more championships than any other team(pre SB era) with 13 total
[/quote]
I refuse to live in the past grasshopper. It’s all about being in the now. & as of rt NOW, we be the same, you lil cocksucker.[/quote]
hahaahhahaahhahaahahhaa
^ LOL!
[quote]print wrote:
[quote]farmerson12 wrote:
[quote]print wrote:
[quote]farmerson12 wrote:
[quote]print wrote:
^ Son! You disappoint.[/quote]
Pfff. Old man, you like sucky QBs and teams. Jets? Pfff. Marinovich? Pff. [/quote]
Would I be mistaken if I say that both of our teams have the exact same record?[/quote]
History grandpa Print. Histoy.
Jets- 1 Superbowl victory
Packers- 4 plus more championships than any other team(pre SB era) with 13 total
[/quote]
I refuse to live in the past grasshopper. It’s all about being in the now. & as of rt NOW, we be the same, you lil cocksucker.[/quote]
LMAO! Get back to your rice pudding.
[quote]MattyXL wrote:
Even though they were severely over matched, I came away being a fan of Pryor, he impressed me, had a nice touch and strong arm, obviously has legs. If the Raiders had any weapons he can really be a QB to build around. [/quote]
Me too. Pryor did do some impressive things. Not bad for learning on the job.
Oakland sucks.
They should just napalm the whole city and start over.
Pryor is a pretty good QB so long as he doesnt have to throw the ball.
Anyone catch Jim Brown blowing up mike holmgren and union on inside the nfl last night?
Disagree, I thought he showed a surprisingly good touch and a quick release.
Anybody know who this woman is that sings the beginning of TNF? She kinda annoys me but has a nice heiny.
Wow. The Rams D is man handling the 9ers offense. No pass or run game yet. Kap seems to have a hard to handling pressure. The first time I really noticed that was this season. I think its something that can be fixed by experience/maturity.
Bradford looks like crap too. What’s this his 4th year and he’s throwing right into coverage. He should already have a few picks.
[quote]strungoutboy21 wrote:
Bradford looks like crap too. What’s this his 4th year and he’s throwing right into coverage. He should already have a few picks.[/quote]
And he missed that wide open TD
[quote]bdocksaints75 wrote:
[quote]strungoutboy21 wrote:
Bradford looks like crap too. What’s this his 4th year and he’s throwing right into coverage. He should already have a few picks.[/quote]
And he missed that wide open TD[/quote]
Ya Bradford is certainly not a franchise QB. He may not lose his starting job next year but sure as hell will have competition; whether that be a rookie or FA.
So Gore runs for 20yrds and then they put in LaMichael James? Interesting.
Well looks like Kap is back in the MVP race
[quote]farmerson12 wrote:
[quote]bdocksaints75 wrote:
[quote]strungoutboy21 wrote:
Bradford looks like crap too. What’s this his 4th year and he’s throwing right into coverage. He should already have a few picks.[/quote]
And he missed that wide open TD[/quote]
Ya Bradford is certainly not a franchise QB. He may not lose his starting job next year but sure as hell will have competition; whether that be a rookie or FA.[/quote]
I doubt he’ll lose his starting gig unless he gets hurt. the rams are finally trying to get that o-line shored up which has been horrible the past few years. he really hasn’t had many wr’s to get the ball to to speak of and losing their best offensive player to the falcons in the offseason certainly didnt help things.
edit. and i think they’ve already had 3 off coord since he’s been there
[quote]js252 wrote:
[quote]farmerson12 wrote:
[quote]bdocksaints75 wrote:
[quote]strungoutboy21 wrote:
Bradford looks like crap too. What’s this his 4th year and he’s throwing right into coverage. He should already have a few picks.[/quote]
And he missed that wide open TD[/quote]
Ya Bradford is certainly not a franchise QB. He may not lose his starting job next year but sure as hell will have competition; whether that be a rookie or FA.[/quote]
I doubt he’ll lose his starting gig unless he gets hurt. the rams are finally trying to get that o-line shored up which has been horrible the past few years. he really hasn’t had many wr’s to get the ball to to speak of and losing their best offensive player to the falcons in the offseason certainly didnt help things.
edit. and i think they’ve already had 3 off coord since he’s been there
[/quote]
It’s hard to completely blame him when the Rams can’t run the ball either. Their O-line may not be good, but he was making bad decisions. Lets just say their offense looked pretty bad.
[quote]strungoutboy21 wrote:
[quote]js252 wrote:
[quote]farmerson12 wrote:
[quote]bdocksaints75 wrote:
[quote]strungoutboy21 wrote:
Bradford looks like crap too. What’s this his 4th year and he’s throwing right into coverage. He should already have a few picks.[/quote]
And he missed that wide open TD[/quote]
Ya Bradford is certainly not a franchise QB. He may not lose his starting job next year but sure as hell will have competition; whether that be a rookie or FA.[/quote]
I doubt he’ll lose his starting gig unless he gets hurt. the rams are finally trying to get that o-line shored up which has been horrible the past few years. he really hasn’t had many wr’s to get the ball to to speak of and losing their best offensive player to the falcons in the offseason certainly didnt help things.
edit. and i think they’ve already had 3 off coord since he’s been there
[/quote]
It’s hard to completely blame him when the Rams can’t run the ball either. Their O-line may not be good, but he was making bad decisions. Lets just say their offense looked pretty bad.[/quote]
watched last weeks Dal game and it was the same thing, no run game whatsoever and he had like 3 seconds to get rid of it or he was getting hit. think dal sacked him 6 times think i seen from box score sf got 5 sacks. i think their starting LT saffold has been out both games.
[quote]js252 wrote:
[quote]strungoutboy21 wrote:
[quote]js252 wrote:
[quote]farmerson12 wrote:
[quote]bdocksaints75 wrote:
[quote]strungoutboy21 wrote:
Bradford looks like crap too. What’s this his 4th year and he’s throwing right into coverage. He should already have a few picks.[/quote]
And he missed that wide open TD[/quote]
Ya Bradford is certainly not a franchise QB. He may not lose his starting job next year but sure as hell will have competition; whether that be a rookie or FA.[/quote]
I doubt he’ll lose his starting gig unless he gets hurt. the rams are finally trying to get that o-line shored up which has been horrible the past few years. he really hasn’t had many wr’s to get the ball to to speak of and losing their best offensive player to the falcons in the offseason certainly didnt help things.
edit. and i think they’ve already had 3 off coord since he’s been there
[/quote]
It’s hard to completely blame him when the Rams can’t run the ball either. Their O-line may not be good, but he was making bad decisions. Lets just say their offense looked pretty bad.[/quote]
watched last weeks Dal game and it was the same thing, no run game whatsoever and he had like 3 seconds to get rid of it or he was getting hit. think dal sacked him 6 times think i seen from box score sf got 5 sacks. i think their starting LT saffold has been out both games.[/quote]
The Rams pretty much have sucked since 2001 when they lost the Super bowl. It doesn’t look like that’s going to change anytime soon.
