Absolutely dominant performance. Seattle looks unstoppable in that building.
That was brutal. Wow.
Seattle is crazy good at home and they showed that the Saints aren’t as good as people think. IMO, the saints were a bit overinflated because of their good record but could lose both matchups with Carolina to show what that D is really made of.
Dominate win by Seattle, I don’t see them getting beat at home in the playoffs.
[quote]gregron wrote:
I say there’s an 80% chance RG3 is hurt before the season is over.
He took at least 15 big hits last night. They’re asking for another serious injury.[/quote]
I’d say there’s an 80% chance he’s hurt period. Shanahan likes to pound people into dust whether they are hurt or not.
His o-line looks almost as bad as the Falcons o-line.
[quote]coolnatedawg wrote:
I definitely don’t disagree that we overpaid to jump up the positions BUT I am still happy having RG3 as our QB. No one thought the QB was the only missing piece to this puzzle. This offseason is going to be HUGE for us in terms of draft/FA pickups.
If we hadn’t jumped up, we would possibly have Tannehill? He’d be getting murdered just the same. Browns would have RG3- I bet they would look pretty good with him over there…[/quote]
I love RG3. I don’t think this is all his fault. He’s clearly hurt, not having OTA’s as a second year player was not good and his o-line blows. If your o-line sucks it doesn’t much matter how much talent you have, you don’t have time to get plays off and you are forced to make hasty and bad decisions.
He needs time in the pocket right now and he doesn’t have it.
[quote]chillain wrote:
^^ thankfully, the Rams extra first-round pick this time will be top-10. or maybe even top-5.
though I’ll maintain zero expectations until they replace OC-Schottenheimer.
[/quote]
You guys take Clowny and I will be pissed…
[quote]pushharder wrote:
Seahawks. Oh my.[/quote]
That was a proper ass whoopin. Seattle looks like the best team right now. Wilson is other worldly and that defense is rediculous.
[quote]gregron wrote:
Seattle is crazy good at home and they showed that the Saints aren’t as good as people think. IMO, the saints were a bit overinflated because of their good record but could lose both matchups with Carolina to show what that D is really made of.[/quote]
It’s that Ryan Curse. That very good defense of the saints got mauled and humiliated. The Ryan brothers always seem to have it good at the begining, but the train leaves the tracks halfway through the season, every year. It’s inexplicable.
I am riding the 'Hawks all the way this year.
[quote]jbpick86 wrote:
[quote]mahwah wrote:
lol[/quote]
Is that Pat??[/quote]
lol… That’s what my face looks like. But there are things I like despite shooting for a high draft pick; things you see as a fan you don’t necessarily pay attention to as an outsider. Particularly the emergence of Paul Worrilow…For all our woe’s he’s been amazing.
[quote]strungoutboy21 wrote:
It’s just a bad year to be a Falcons fan. Has a team ever gone from having the best record in a conference to almost the worst the next year?
Also, Roddy White killed my fantasy team this year. [/quote]
Yeah, but he’s a hell of a nice guy. We met him at a restaurant a couple of weeks ago, very gracious and appreciative. Very nice to my daughter.
We have run in to Falcon’s players all over the place this year, met DeCoud at the mall the other day. My daughter ran up and tackled him with a giant hug because she thought he was somebody else. Her face when we told her who it was, was priceless. He got a good laugh out of it. Biggest tackle he’s gotten all year.
[quote]mbdix wrote:
Just another game winning drive by Romo. Ok bye[/quote]
He’s grown on me… 
[quote]strungoutboy21 wrote:
[quote]jbpick86 wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]pushharder wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
…Denver should have just run the ball every down, lol. Would have won by 24.
[/quote]
Agreed.
Manning sat on the sideline shivering like a cheerleader in a short skirt. Poor guy was cold. Needs to grow a beard and eat hot soup before the game. Buck the fuck up, Peyton.
Too many seasons of toasty luxury in Indy’s dome, I guess.
[/quote]
He seems to fold in the cold, and Manning, unlike his little brother, seems to thrive in low pressure situations, and stumble when the going gets tough. Given that Indy team, he should have won at least 1 more ring, if not be sitting on 3 or 4.
I don’t know, maybe I ask too much, but Brady won 3 with lessor offenses. (Better D’s, but lessor offenses.)[/quote]
Brady’s offenses were not quite as good as Peyton’s but his defenses were worlds better. Peyton never played with a defense that was capable of winning a championship. That Bruschi, McGinnest, Law, Harrison, Seymour, Vrabel def that Brady won his 3 with was one of the better (and more underrated) defenses ever. Without those defense’s there isn’t even a discussion about which one is better because Brady barely sniffs the playoffs every year. Hell, Matt Cassell won 8 games with them so that should tell you something huge right there. You think if Peyton only manages to put up 17 against the “greatest show on turf” that the Colts d has them in a position for Vanderjact to win the game??[/quote]
Kind of dumb to say that. Brady has out performed Manning as far as playoff numbers go with less weapons on offense except for the one year the Pats went undefeated during the regular season. I just think Brady is better as far as the postseason goes. [/quote]
Brady is more clutch and when the chips are down, between the two I pick Brady.
Well that wasn’t nearly as exciting as I was hoping for. I didn’t even stay up for the whole game since the Saints were just 3-and-out the whole time basically.
I’m seriously curious how that game would have panned out in NO rather than SEA. Either way, NFC will go through there and I don’t know of a single team that has a chance in that stadium.
One stat that jumped out at me was Seattle has allowed 15 total punt-return yards all year. Weird stat, but that is ridiculous.
I hope SF beats Seattle this week and NO beats Carolina.
That would be awesome. Total shake up in the perception of the NFC 
[quote]gregron wrote:
I hope SF beats Seattle this week and NO beats Carolina.
That would be awesome. Total shake up in the perception of the NFC :)[/quote]
Both highly possible outcomes. The Saints as a whole looked horrible, even though the front did a pretty decent job on Lynch.
[quote]jbpick86 wrote:
[quote]gregron wrote:
I hope SF beats Seattle this week and NO beats Carolina.
That would be awesome. Total shake up in the perception of the NFC :)[/quote]
Both highly possible outcomes. The Saints as a whole looked horrible, even though the front did a pretty decent job on Lynch. [/quote]
I donno, Carolina’s defense is really good.
[quote]pat wrote:
[quote]jbpick86 wrote:
[quote]gregron wrote:
I hope SF beats Seattle this week and NO beats Carolina.
That would be awesome. Total shake up in the perception of the NFC :)[/quote]
Both highly possible outcomes. The Saints as a whole looked horrible, even though the front did a pretty decent job on Lynch. [/quote]
I donno, Carolina’s defense is really good. [/quote]
I mean no doubt there but the weather will not be helping Carolina out. Not saying that last nights domination was the weather but it was at least a small factor. It should be a good game. The new O coordinator of the Panthers deserves a lot of credit because he totally changed the way that team moves the ball and made it much more effective.
Seattle needs two wins to clinch the no. 1 seed regardless of what anyone else does. I suspect that might happen, so I wouldn’t be shocked at all with a Niner win.