[quote]WestCoast7 wrote:
Just thought I’d point out that the 49ers, yes the San Francisco 49ers, have the best statistical odds of making the playoffs right now.
My.
Mind.
Has.
Been.
Blown.[/quote]
Lol, that’s funny. There’s too many things that statistics just can’t measure, though.
I would like to point out something - I’ve heard of NFL Live/whatever other ESPN program that the previous 5 times the Packers started 5-0 they went to the Super Bowl… :)[/quote]
I heard to that too. I had a huge smile on my face when they said that.
[quote]farmerson12 wrote:
This is random but I would hate to be a RB under Shanahan. Whether its an injury or bad game, you are in a world of confusion as to who the starter is or if you will even play or stay on the team. Looks like Hightower may take the backseat. [/quote]
Speaking of Shanahan…and the Broncos, given the lack of success and downright seeming confusion in the Broncos organization after years and years of blue chip seasons under Shanahan, does anyone suppose Bowlen is now kicking himself for kicking Mike to the curb? [/quote]
I gotta figure Bowlen wants a do-over on both Shanahan and the Cutler/Orton/McDaniels fiasco
[quote]print wrote:
^Maybe not. One of the big reason Ryan was hired was because of what Cle. did to NE. last yr. He knows how to game plan Brady & part of that is throwing every blitz & his amoeba defense at him. Wouldn’t surprise me if the boys won.[/quote]
I have decided to approach this with the Beans approach, talk shit about my own team and how good the other team is. Its works for him. :)[/quote]
Nah, the Pats have a very hard time with Ryan D’s, and BJGE will be limited if even play. So there will be no run game.
Thr Pats are something retarded like 62-1 when they run more than Pass in the Brady era, but without a running back, that isn’t possible.
I’m saying the Boys win in a shootout, unless Romo nukes again and hands the Pats a win. Which is very unlikely because the Pats D couldn’t cover Print right now…
31-24 Boys in a barn burner, crowd quiet by mid way through the second.
[quote]print wrote:
^Maybe not. One of the big reason Ryan was hired was because of what Cle. did to NE. last yr. He knows how to game plan Brady & part of that is throwing every blitz & his amoeba defense at him. Wouldn’t surprise me if the boys won.[/quote]
I have decided to approach this with the Beans approach, talk shit about my own team and how good the other team is. Its works for him. :)[/quote]
Nah, the Pats have a very hard time with Ryan D’s, and BJGE will be limited if even play. So there will be no run game.
Thr Pats are something retarded like 62-1 when they run more than Pass in the Brady era, but without a running back, that isn’t possible.
I’m saying the Boys win in a shootout, unless Romo nukes again and hands the Pats a win. Which is very unlikely because the Pats D couldn’t cover Print right now…
31-24 Boys in a barn burner, crowd quiet by mid way through the second.[/quote]
Okay you WILL NOT OUTDO ME in this war of reverse pysch.
Brady is going to pick apart in short passing game up the middle cause are safeties couldnt cover PRINT’s MOM.
Romo would throw a pick to Wilfork when he is laying on his back trying to catch his breath.
Our running game which consists of two RB running into the back of their own guard or tackle and falling down.
Yea its a shoot out at Pats 38 Dallas 21
Have the Pats scored less than 30 points this year in a game?
Have the Pats scored less than 30 points this year in a game?[/quote]
No, and it is the only reason they have won.
Rob Ryan will figure out a way to stuff the shit out of them just like last year. With no run game the backers will play 7 yards off the ball and take away teh short game and the pats can’t win with colts style 12-22 yard passes all day. They don’t have anyone that can get that far off the LOS before Ware kills Brady, let alone get seperation. Print could cover Chad.
I think you under estimate how bad the Pats D is, they are so bad, they will make Romo look like a winning QB. He scored how much on the lions? He will destroy the Pats soft secondary.
Have the Pats scored less than 30 points this year in a game?[/quote]
No, and it is the only reason they have won.
Rob Ryan will figure out a way to stuff the shit out of them just like last year. With no run game the backers will play 7 yards off the ball and take away teh short game and the pats can’t win with colts style 12-22 yard passes all day. They don’t have anyone that can get that far off the LOS before Ware kills Brady, let alone get seperation. Print could cover Chad.
I think you under estimate how bad the Pats D is, they are so bad, they will make Romo look like a winning QB. He scored how much on the lions? He will destroy the Pats soft secondary.
[/quote]
Have the Pats scored less than 30 points this year in a game?[/quote]
No, and it is the only reason they have won.
Rob Ryan will figure out a way to stuff the shit out of them just like last year. With no run game the backers will play 7 yards off the ball and take away teh short game and the pats can’t win with colts style 12-22 yard passes all day. They don’t have anyone that can get that far off the LOS before Ware kills Brady, let alone get seperation. Print could cover Chad.
I think you under estimate how bad the Pats D is, they are so bad, they will make Romo look like a winning QB. He scored how much on the lions? He will destroy the Pats soft secondary.
[/quote]
Well your kicker is better than ours. [/quote]
That fucker sucks outside of 30 yards, and has like 1 game winning kick under his belt. Plus, he is the only kicker that CAN’T kick a touchback after tearing his quad last year.
Have the Pats scored less than 30 points this year in a game?[/quote]
No, and it is the only reason they have won.
Rob Ryan will figure out a way to stuff the shit out of them just like last year. With no run game the backers will play 7 yards off the ball and take away teh short game and the pats can’t win with colts style 12-22 yard passes all day. They don’t have anyone that can get that far off the LOS before Ware kills Brady, let alone get seperation. Print could cover Chad.
I think you under estimate how bad the Pats D is, they are so bad, they will make Romo look like a winning QB. He scored how much on the lions? He will destroy the Pats soft secondary.
[/quote]
Well your kicker is better than ours. [/quote]
That fucker sucks outside of 30 yards, and has like 1 game winning kick under his belt. Plus, he is the only kicker that CAN’T kick a touchback after tearing his quad last year.
shameful how bad this NE team is.[/quote]
Dammit Beans, well you QB is 100 million times better than ours.
[quote]gregron wrote:
^^add in 2 cheerleaders plus the water boy and we have a deal[/quote]
Thanks, that’s the cue I needed,
Bradley, shut up or I will wink at you for the next six months straight. ;-)[/quote]
Bless you good sir. Pittsburgh has no cheerleaders which to me is wrong. If they did they would probably be calld something stupid like the Steelettes lol.
Have the Pats scored less than 30 points this year in a game?[/quote]
No, and it is the only reason they have won.
Rob Ryan will figure out a way to stuff the shit out of them just like last year. With no run game the backers will play 7 yards off the ball and take away teh short game and the pats can’t win with colts style 12-22 yard passes all day. They don’t have anyone that can get that far off the LOS before Ware kills Brady, let alone get seperation. Print could cover Chad.
I think you under estimate how bad the Pats D is, they are so bad, they will make Romo look like a winning QB. He scored how much on the lions? He will destroy the Pats soft secondary.
[/quote]
Well your kicker is better than ours. [/quote]
That fucker sucks outside of 30 yards, and has like 1 game winning kick under his belt. Plus, he is the only kicker that CAN’T kick a touchback after tearing his quad last year.
shameful how bad this NE team is.[/quote]
Dammit Beans, well you QB is 100 million times better than ours.
[/quote]
Gallant attempt DJ but the Beaner has been at this reverse game awhile me thinks, honed his craft he has.
As much as I hate Collinsworth, the opposite would be true of Simms, tells it like it is, admits mistakes, super knowledgeable…the best out there IMO.
The stats dont show it but Eli is having a great game, and an excellent year, he is another QB that gets villified because he isnt as good as his brother, but he is very good in his own right and there arent many qbs I would take over him.
LET GO COWBOYS!
I cannot believe Im rooting for cowboys, however I would have probably root for hitler if he was playing the Pats.
