[quote]sen say wrote:
OctoberGirl wrote:
I mean classic literature.
I hate to admit it but I only read “Of Mice and Men” about 2-years ago. I loved the story, it was incredibley powerful and I get why that is a classic.
So are there new classics today?
A couple of books that I have read that are modern that I think can last are:
The Painted House - John Grisham
Ender’s Game - Orson Scott Card
Stand by Me - Stephen King
The Summer Tree (The Fionavar Tapestry, Book 1), The Wandering Fire (The Fionavar Tapestry, Book 2), The Darkest Road (The Fionavar Tapestry, Book 3) - Guy Gavriel Kay
Those are some of the ones I always mention to folks who ask me about a good book.
I wasn’t sure if Shirley Jackson was modern or classic but if modern than:
The Lottery - Shirley Jackson
I don’t think Ender’s Game or anything by Grisham or King will ever be considered ‘classic literature’…Ender’s Game is a kid’s book and Grisham and King are pretty much ‘kid lit’ also…not trying to disparage your selections OG…I enjoy King and Grisham (not really) and I think my kids have read the Ender series…and probably 20% of the books I read are ‘kid lit’.
I 100% think that both Grisham and King will be around in 50 - 100 years. I think the large amount of work and their mass market popularity will make these guys kind of like the Beatles and the Stones of the publishing industry. I don’t think there’s anything to what they are writing though that makes them ‘classic’.
So…the question is, ‘what IS classic literature’ ? I majored in English Literature for my undergrad degree and probably wrote a hundred papers on this topic. This actually bored the shit out of me and led me to pursue a graduate degree in business.
So…
Everything is driven so much by marketing today. The publishing industry exists only to make money. So many books exist today that aren’t really that great, but that we’re told are great…Brett Easton Ellis and Jay McInernay come to mind…not to bash the guys that suggested them as modern classics. I like both of their work…but…c’mon…they’re regurgitating stories and engaging in meta and pseudo fiction in order to seem ‘edgy’.
In regards to people wanting to read ‘classics’…I understand there’s a canon of literature out there that addresses universal dreams, beliefs, ideas and that is timeless…but…if it wasn’t for the publishing industry (and college curriculums) shoving these books down our throats…would we really choose to read them? I had to read so much that did not speak to me in college because the professor had written his book 20 years ago about that particular author/book and was too lazy to do anything new…
I read a quote somewhere from someone explaining how it cracked them up when someone referenced a book from the 18th or 19th century as THEIR ALL TIME FAVORITE BOOK ! It’s like saying your all time favorite song was one penned in the 18th or 19th century…I always liked that quote…
Some authors I recommend (that haven’t already been mentioned) that may (imho) become classics:
Tom Robbins
Salman Rushdie
Don DeLillo
John Kennedy Toole
Kurt Vonnegut
Raymond Carver
Jose Saramago
[/quote]
Since when can “kid lit” not be classic literature? I’m re-reading “The Chronicles of Narnia” right now is why I thought to disagree.
C.S. Lewis’ Space Trilogy are my favorite books ever. Talk about descriptive, I swear I can smell the places he describes.