Thats not excercising. That cruelty to children. I couldnt even watch the whole video
Fucking sick
Coudn’t finish it either, anyone got a name to go with this wonder-mom?
Apparently it’s some form of manual therapy that’s popular in Russia, for the development of children’s physical motor skills.
I found it fascinating and terrifying all at the same time. The least she could have done was stood on some carpet… yikes!
WTF?!!!?!?!
Man, that’s one durable baby. Where can I get one?
thats not a very good parent.
Weird the baby isn’t crying though.
Finally the secrets of the soviets revealed!
The russian babybell system for hard traing comrades!
You gotta be kidding me
Not only is this cruelty to children, this is child pornography
Some1 needs to send this into the police
I found it very hard to watch all of that… I kept expecting one of the kid’s arms to tear off.
That is very strange the baby isn’t crying.
While I agree this is cruel, how do you see it as pornography? Just because it’s a naked baby, doesn’t make it porn FFS.
Cruel? The child seemed pretty happy to me.
If it’s good for the child, it can look as weird as it has to be.
And to this guy: [quote]“Not only is this cruelty to children, this is child pornography
Some1 needs to send this into the police” [/quote]
I believe you got some serious mental issues.
LOL! That baby’s gonna be a great gymnast one day.
Besides the fact that there’s no padding on the floor, I don’t see anything wrong.
[quote]Schwarzfahrer wrote:
Cruel?And to this guy: “Not only is this cruelty to children, this is child pornography
Some1 needs to send this into the police”
I believe you got some serious mental issues.[/quote]
Not every1 likes seeing naked babies being tossed around like you
[quote]Schwarzfahrer wrote:
Cruel? The child seemed pretty happy to me.
If it’s good for the child, it can look as weird as it has to be.
And to this guy: “Not only is this cruelty to children, this is child pornography
Some1 needs to send this into the police”
I believe you got some serious mental issues.[/quote]
agreed. as weird and dangerous as it looks (still think she shouldn’t do it over a hard floor) i’m sure the baby would let us know if it was painful or uncomfortable… it wasn’t made for sexual gratification so i don’t see how its pornography. this whole pedophile thing has gone way too far…
A babies brain and neck should not be exposed to that much whipping around.
[quote]PGA wrote:
A babies brain and neck should not be exposed to that much whipping around.[/quote]
I dunno…if the baby were hurt by the movement, he’d definitely have been crying about it. Furthermore, I’m certainly no expert on the aerodynamics of the human baby, but the woman’s motions seemed very swift and graceful without any violent jerking around…your statement is plausible and very likely absolutely correct, given the formative state of the infant body, but her smooth movement definitely seemed to minimize the risk of neck strain and the brain bouncing around. Anyone with knowledge regarding obstetrics, please edify us.
Shaken baby syndrome much?
[quote]PGA wrote:
A babies brain and neck should not be exposed to that much whipping around.[/quote]
Seriously, we dont want the poor little bugger to turn out like you.