[quote]UtahLama wrote:
This is about Reid, his son, the Chinese and his lackey former staff member that runs the BLM.[/quote]
When did I say it wasn’t?
Bundy lost all his support because he couldn’t keep his mouth shut. The media isn’t going to report any of the things you just mentioned now that they have the race issue to run with.
[quote]Will207 wrote:
He isolated black people in his comments. He could have made his point without involving race. To suggest that black people are the only ones on government assistance, having abortions, and questioning whether or not black families would be better off enslaved is ridiculous.
[/quote]
Where do you all live if you didn’t grow up hearing these types of statements from people Bundy’s age and older?
Some of the housing projects in my city have curfews for adult residents. People who live in housing projects are slaves.
Why in the world would comments like those from a damn rancher in the middle of nowhere be newsworthy? The government is waiting to get consent from its slaves to destroy the man.
[quote]NickViar wrote:
Why in the world would comments like those from a damn rancher in the middle of nowhere be newsworthy? The government is waiting to get consent from its slaves to destroy the man. [/quote]
It’s newsworthy because everyone is walking away from Bundy over it.
[quote]NickViar wrote:
Why in the world would comments like those from a damn rancher in the middle of nowhere be newsworthy? The government is waiting to get consent from its slaves to destroy the man. [/quote]
It’s newsworthy because everyone is walking away from Bundy over it. [/quote]
[quote]Bauber wrote:
Most of the poor regardless of race have become slaves to the government institution. I think that is what Bundy was referring too. Although his language was not PC, I did not take his comments are inherently deviant and racist.[/quote]
He isolated black people in his comments. He could have made his point without involving race. To suggest that black people are the only ones on government assistance, having abortions, and questioning whether or not black families would be better off enslaved is ridiculous.
[/quote]
I agree he should have just left race out of it.
And sadly many still are enslaved, just in a different form. Trading one master for another.
“They abort their young children, they put their young men in jail, because they never learned how to pick cotton. And I’ve often wondered, are they better off as slaves, picking cotton and having a family life and doing things, or are they better off under government subsidy? They didn’t get no more freedom. They got less freedom.”
[quote]Bauber wrote:
Most of the poor regardless of race have become slaves to the government institution. I think that is what Bundy was referring too. Although his language was not PC, I did not take his comments are inherently deviant and racist.[/quote]
He isolated black people in his comments. He could have made his point without involving race. To suggest that black people are the only ones on government assistance, having abortions, and questioning whether or not black families would be better off enslaved is ridiculous.
[/quote]
I agree he should have just left race out of it.
And sadly many still are enslaved, just in a different form. Trading one master for another.[/quote]
I understand and agree with his underlying message, but his choice of words is going to bury him.
FDR said it better:
“The lessons of history, confirmed by the evidence immediately before me, show conclusively that continued dependence upon relief induces a spiritual and moral disintegration fundamentally destructive to the national fibre. To dole out relief in this way is to administer a narcotic, a subtle destroyer of the human spirit. It is inimical to the dictates of sound policy. It is in violation of the traditions of America. Work must be found for able-bodied but destitute workers… The Federal Government must and shall quit this business of relief.”
[quote]Bauber wrote:
Most of the poor regardless of race have become slaves to the government institution. I think that is what Bundy was referring too. Although his language was not PC, I did not take his comments are inherently deviant and racist.[/quote]
He isolated black people in his comments. He could have made his point without involving race. To suggest that black people are the only ones on government assistance, having abortions, and questioning whether or not black families would be better off enslaved is ridiculous.
[/quote]
I agree he should have just left race out of it.
And sadly many still are enslaved, just in a different form. Trading one master for another.[/quote]
I understand and agree with his underlying message, but his choice of words is going to bury him.
FDR said it better:
“The lessons of history, confirmed by the evidence immediately before me, show conclusively that continued dependence upon relief induces a spiritual and moral disintegration fundamentally destructive to the national fibre. To dole out relief in this way is to administer a narcotic, a subtle destroyer of the human spirit. It is inimical to the dictates of sound policy. It is in violation of the traditions of America. Work must be found for able-bodied but destitute workers… The Federal Government must and shall quit this business of relief.”
[/quote]
Yes, yes they will. The PC police are already crucifying him.
“They abort their young children, they put their young men in jail, because they never learned how to pick cotton. And I’ve often wondered, are they better off as slaves, picking cotton and having a family life and doing things, or are they better off under government subsidy? They didn’t get no more freedom. They got less freedom.”
“They abort their young children, they put their young men in jail, because they never learned how to pick cotton. And I’ve often wondered, are they better off as slaves, picking cotton and having a family life and doing things, or are they better off under government subsidy? They didn’t get no more freedom. They got less freedom.”
“They abort their young children, they put their young men in jail, because they never learned how to pick cotton. And I’ve often wondered, are they better off as slaves, picking cotton and having a family life and doing things, or are they better off under government subsidy? They didn’t get no more freedom. They got less freedom.”
“They abort their young children, they put their young men in jail, because they never learned how to pick cotton. And I’ve often wondered, are they better off as slaves, picking cotton and having a family life and doing things, or are they better off under government subsidy? They didn’t get no more freedom. They got less freedom.”
“They abort their young children, they put their young men in jail, because they never learned how to pick cotton. And I’ve often wondered, are they better off as slaves, picking cotton and having a family life and doing things, or are they better off under government subsidy? They didn’t get no more freedom. They got less freedom.”
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
hope you are in favor of Gay Marriage
[/quote]
Marriage is a religious issue, not a legal issue. The law should no more distinguish a married person or persons from a baptized person or a Bar Mitzvahed person. Those are religious rites, between that person and G-d.
So, if two sodomites wish to pretend to be married, I won’t stand in their way and nor should the government. In short, I “tolerate” them.
Similarly, I should be free to ignore their abomination and not interact with them if I so choose. In short, I do not “accept” them.
It is this second point – “acceptance” – that sodomites wish to force upon other people. Such forced acceptance is contrary to a free society. Homosexual sex is abhorred in Judaism. I should not be forced to change my religious beliefs.
[quote]UtahLama wrote:
I thought you held dual citizenship JB?..I may be wrong.
But I assume that when push comes to shove you are on the first thing smoking back to Tel-Aviv?[/quote]
I am, due to accident of my parents’ brief citizenship of the USA.
But, no, I don’t really consider myself anything but a guest here. I was born in Israel, grew up there. Once Mrs. Jewbacca finishes her training, we’ll go home. My law firm has an office in Tel-Aviv, most of my clients are Israeli doing business in the USA; not a big switch.
This has more twists and turns than most movies. I’m really happy that it looks like lethal force by either side is going to end up not being used. At the beginning I did think we were looking at Waco 2.0.
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
hope you are in favor of Gay Marriage
[/quote]
Marriage is a religious issue, not a legal issue. The law should no more distinguish a married person or persons from a baptized person or a Bar Mitzvahed person. Those are religious rites, between that person and G-d.
So, if two sodomites wish to pretend to be married, I won’t stand in their way and nor should the government. In short, I “tolerate” them.
Similarly, I should be free to ignore their abomination and not interact with them if I so choose. In short, I do not “accept” them.
It is this second point – “acceptance” – that sodomites wish to force upon other people. Such forced acceptance is contrary to a free society. Homosexual sex is abhorred in Judaism. I should not be forced to change my religious beliefs.[/quote]
What would you call it if Obama(MAN) were to suck your uncircumsized penis?