[quote]escot4 wrote:
deputydawg wrote:
The Spurs won? I guess I fell asleep during the game. Tony Parker’s thread the needle passes and his drives to the basket are just so BORING!!! Really, and that Manu Ginoblli with his steals and alley oops and threes, talk about snooze inducing basketball. Shaq taking two steps, flattening two pesky defenders, and then dunking the ball, now that’s exciting basketball.
Prediction: LeBron is a quick study. Game two will be much closer, Game two may be a big surprise.
I actually did find it boring. Not because of their style, but just because I’ve seen this team and those same players win over and over. Not only that, but they win a lot of games by double figures, so the game is often in hand at the end with them, thereby limiting the great finishes.
I respect that they’re a great team, but I’m just sick of seeing them. I don’t usually like dynasties as a fan (as a coach I would love one). I much prefer to see a team win that’s on the rise and has never been there before.
[/quote]
I think that is pretty natural. Everyone loves an underdog, and everyone loves the cinderella story. It’s also why a lot of people have distaste for the most dominant teams.
It’s what people can relate to the most I think, when your an underdog team, you might have the talent to win or even the experience to win, but it will take a lot of work and solid commitment to actually prevail. People like to see ascension, growth and development, because it reminds them how they can achieve great things when they work really hard for it.
On the converse, the successful dominant teams and players often get glossed over and taken for granted in a sense because there is this feeling like “oh they don’t even have to work for it, they are just that good, what’s the point?”.
Personally, I love rooting for an unlikely match up and an upset, but at the same time, I respect athleticism and the amount of work it takes any champion contender to get there, whether or not they are actually struggling in the end.