[quote]elliot007 wrote:
i might be confused, i thought thdialogues of plato, and the republic were different(it has been about 15 years since i read these)
i thought one was the life of socrates, and that the republic was about plato’s utopian society [i could definitely be wrong about the titles]
[/quote]
Plato wrote dialogues. There are some letters that are attributed to him, as well as some poetry, but AFAIK there are no treatises attributed to Plato.
That said, Plato wrote two large works specifically dealing with city-building, which were The Republic and The Laws. Both are in dialogue form, with Socrates being the primary speaker in the former, and an “Athenian stranger” as the primary speaker in the latter. IIRC, The Laws is the only Platonic dialogue in which Socrates never makes an explicit appearance.
In terms of the life of Socrates, it’s all mixed in beginning with Parmenides and ending with the dialogues that comprise “the Last Days of Socrates,” including the Apologia (in which Socrates gives his defense to the charges levied against him).
So in that sense, The Republic and The Laws contain no real biographical information on Socrates, though still in dialogue form.
Now, Aristotle wrote both treatises and dialogues. We have, unfortunately, lost most of the dialogues; the treatises most commonly read are the Nichomachean Ethics (probably so named because they were written to his son) and The Politics. I recommend the Joe Sachs translation for either of those, btw. Of course, Aristotle had a very large body of work, but it is worth considering that his treatises were not the highest form of his teaching (remember, Plato avoided treatises for a reason… cf Letter VII for a possible reason why). Aristotle had his own school at this point, and his treatises may have been textbooks of sorts.
At any rate, that’s speculation. To return to your original question, we should differentiate The Republic and The Laws. The Republic was a “city in speech,” that is to say, an ideal city constructed under the best conditions. As such, it was unrealizable, and was founded on a “noble lie.” The Laws, on the other hand, are concerned directly with the pragmatic considerations for state-building; some say that in The Laws, Plato perfected the existing laws of Lacedaemonia.
This is all probably more than you wanted to know, but I’m bored at work… so.