[quote]Makavali wrote:
Gkhan wrote:
Islamo-authoritarian doesn’t have the nice ring to it.
Islamotarian?[/quote]
Or you could use the widely accepted version: Islamism.
[quote]lixy wrote:
Makavali wrote:
Gkhan wrote:
Islamo-authoritarian doesn’t have the nice ring to it.
Islamotarian?
Or you could use the widely accepted version: Islamism.[/quote]
Shush. I’m trying to leave my mark on the English language by creating new words and pushing my own definitions on other words around.
[quote]lixy wrote:
Makavali wrote:
Gkhan wrote:
Islamo-authoritarian doesn’t have the nice ring to it.
Islamotarian?
Or you could use the widely accepted version: Islamism.[/quote]
Yeah, aren’t you the same guy who said there was a difference between Islamists and extremists like al-qaeda?
Are the different or one and the same?
[quote]orion wrote:
I will think of something that can be used to bomb people but is not entirely wrong.
[/quote]
Mak nailed it.
[quote]Gkhan wrote:
orion wrote:
I will think of something that can be used to bomb people but is not entirely wrong.
Mak nailed it.[/quote]
Damn.
I was going for Islamiacs.
[quote]DrSkeptix wrote:
thunderbolt23 wrote:
orion wrote:
…
As you continue to demonstrate unchartered ignorance on all things American, your picture of the Klan rally outside the Capitol building isn’t evidence of “totalitarianism” at all - such a demonstration was a private matter done under th auspices of the First Amendment, not a government event.
The day after could have hosted an NAACP or an Anti-Defamation League march all the same - and it would be as much evidence of “fascism”.
Oh, and quick fact-in-point on your “evidence”, since you’re too dim to know the difference - the KKK wanted a smaller federal government and were states’ rights advocates. They weren’t interested in taking over DC to introduce a totalitarian state so much as they wanted to trim the sails of the federal state to return state power with a primary goal of engineering white power through state and local governments.
In either words, they were fellow travelers in the “libertarian” mold, not overarching “fascists” who wanted a centralized state.
That’s why all the idiot anti-government white power types were Ron Paul backers.
Can you remember when you got something right? Me neither.
The Sophisticate–or is it Poseur?–Orion, you see, is offended that we do not rise as one and proclaim him the wisest man since the Renaissance.
He simply cannot comprehend American pluralism and he is not interested in reading beyond his ideologically polluted websites.
But, he can, as predicted, produce a slew of disconnected motes, from dubious (to say the least) sources.I choose not to address this purposeless minutiae which falsely likens the KKK or the NRA to a totalitarian state. Friend TB, disputing his silly points serves only his ego, and not the subject of the thread.
[/quote]
…
[quote]orion wrote:
Gkhan wrote:
orion wrote:
I will think of something that can be used to bomb people but is not entirely wrong.
Mak nailed it.
Damn.
I was going for Islamiacs.
[/quote]
Good one.
[quote]orion wrote:
…[/quote]
Is this the best you can do?
You, the Sophisticate? The Poseur? The Greatest Mind Since the Renaissance? The Grand Paraclete of Auburn, Miss? The Great Debater, armed with random gleanings from corrupted websites?
I would suggest that you stick to subjects in which you are personally experienced or expert–for example, social parasitism, or sachertorte–since, as I have written before, I do not engage in a battle of wits with someone who is only half-armed.
[quote]DrSkeptix wrote:
orion wrote:
…
Is this the best you can do?
You, the Sophisticate? The Poseur? The Greatest Mind Since the Renaissance? The Grand Paraclete of Auburn, Miss? The Great Debater, armed with random gleanings from corrupted websites?
I would suggest that you stick to subjects in which you are personally experienced or expert–for example, social parasitism, or sachertorte–since, as I have written before, I do not engage in a battle of wits with someone who is only half-armed.[/quote]
Yeah, because being entirely without arms, you know your fate.
Or then again, maybe you don´t.
[quote]orion wrote:
DrSkeptix wrote:
orion wrote:
…
Is this the best you can do?
You, the Sophisticate? The Poseur? The Greatest Mind Since the Renaissance? The Grand Paraclete of Auburn, Miss? The Great Debater, armed with random gleanings from corrupted websites?
I would suggest that you stick to subjects in which you are personally experienced or expert–for example, social parasitism, or sachertorte–since, as I have written before, I do not engage in a battle of wits with someone who is only half-armed.
Yeah, because being entirely without arms, you know your fate.
Or then again, maybe you don´t.
Ha! Better, much better!
[quote]PRCalDude wrote:
Why don’t we call it plain, old Islam and drop the fascism part. It’s reality. [/quote]
Because that would be politically incorrect.
[quote]Gkhan wrote:
orion wrote:
Gkhan wrote:
orion wrote:
I will think of something that can be used to bomb people but is not entirely wrong.
Mak nailed it.
Damn.
I was going for Islamiacs.
Good one.[/quote]
Islamaniacs
[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
Gkhan wrote:
orion wrote:
Gkhan wrote:
orion wrote:
I will think of something that can be used to bomb people but is not entirely wrong.
Mak nailed it.
Damn.
I was going for Islamiacs.
Good one.
Islamaniacs[/quote]
I thought of that, but does it really roll of the tongue?
Same reason why I think Islamotards does not really work.
[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
Islamaniacs[/quote]
Isn’t that a kids cartoon?
[quote]Makavali wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
Islamaniacs
Isn’t that a kids cartoon?[/quote]
Obamaniacs?
[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
Makavali wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
Islamaniacs
Isn’t that a kids cartoon?
Obamaniacs?[/quote]
It’s time for Obamaniacs…
And they’re zany to the max…
So just sit back and relax…
Something something something…
…
How about a catchy acronym?
Something like:D.I.L.D.O (Deficient IsLamic Democracy Oversight).
As in…“Your country has an enormous DILDO problem.”
[quote]orion wrote:
A publication, warning against the eternal threat of the Jew, funded by Henry Ford…[/quote]
“Dearborn publishing co.”
Funny how the legacy of Jew-hatred continues in that place. One influential antisemite dies to be replaced by .5 million Hizb’allah sympathizers:
http://www.google.com/search?q=dearbornistan&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a