Every regulation and tax affects capitalism-all are uninvolved third-party enacted.
You’ll have to point out the regulations and taxes you have in mind, for me to attempt to answer specifically.
Everything they did and do has some effect.
Of course you don’t. As someone seeing the operation from the inside whose narrative doesn’t jive with yours must be a phony or incompetent.
Nice dodging your own statement, fucknugget.
Sounds so much like the U.S.
You fight against things because they’re wrong, not because you’d think you can win.
No it is YOU who are clueless who makes the laws that you condone.
So why in the hell would corporations buy politicians. Oh yeah, I know they don’t
Any examples?
Way to ignore facts and data. I knew you would take my comment this way. Yes there is wealth disparity. I already posted data on that above, including the limitations on that data.
No one in the US is starving at levels seen the lower castes in India, or the many who starved in Stalin’s Russia. The poorest 10% of the US are still doing better than a lot of the rest of the world.
Again, if it’s so terrible here - feel free to emigrate somewhere else and see how you fare.
It’s by no means close to perfect, just or fair (as if a society made up of humans could ever be those things).
Yes, but the way you are “fighting” the battle is ineffectual, inconsequential, and over the top asinine. Fighting capitalism by making your money directly from its ability to push other economies down…way to go dumbass.
Yeah, the attorney is clueless on how laws work/are made/lobbied for…compared to the zero educated leech.
Gimme’ a break.
2 Likes
Is this a serious question? To gain an advantage over competitors.
Trump Admin: bump stock ban
Biden Admin: environmental standards for engines
How? By influencing laws? Is this a serious inquiry?
Trump’s tax breaks for those who already have more than enough.
Biden’s Willow project or the breaking of unions.
Do people who have a normal job make their money from Capitalism?
From a person who believes that because you have a degree you are right.
Another compare the U.S. to other countries so as to ignore what is happening here. Bravo!
Maybe that is what the slaves should have done as they were seen to be 3/5ths of a human. Did they emigrate or fight for what they believed in? Did this take more than 1 march or protest?
Yes.
I don’t know. That’s why I asked you, the inquirer.
There you go. Everything politicians do influences the market.
No, I don’t believe a degree makes me right. It has proven repeatedly that I can interpret data better than you.
And on matters of law - I am going to listen to the attorney.
Therein lies part of the problem. You don’t actually listen to experts just some assholes with a blog. Or you only listen to the experts whose conclusions align with your worldview regardless of the criticisms leveled against them. But you can’t accurately interpret your chosen expert datasets without reading your own conclusions into them so you end up bastardizing their conclusions to fit your view.
Yes, but most of them aren’t so adamantly against it as you are. And without capitalism or at the very least frequently changing market pressures you would make fuck all.
Again you are a hypocrite.
Equating the fact that some folks are poor to slavery is a piss poor comparison.
2 Likes
You only agree with him because of your own bias, lol. The fact that you don’t see that is hilariously pathetic.
I’m not dodging anything you’re just overstating the significance of retail traders on the economy or just plain wrong.
1 Like
It’s not remotely like the US you fucking dolt.
Imagine being a day trader and comparing your “fight” to slavery. Absolute clown show.
1 Like
I’m pretty sure I know who makes the laws and more about the laws than you as well.
A person with zero education and no law degree telling an attorney he knows more about laws and who makes them.
Okayyyyyyyu 
4 Likes
You didn’t read the article. Don’t lie.
If you did read it and still saw it fit to respond with the above reply, then you don’t understand it and should not be commenting on it, let alone any form of policies.
I literally, purposefully, dumbed it down to 5th grade level.
His “thought process” is the exact embodiment of the process that causes large language models to hallucinate. I’m actually copying portions of this exchange to show people why this happens in non-technical terms.
Where are the hamsters?
2 Likes
Lmao,
No, because he has the evidence on his side, lol. You still believe the deficit is something to worry about. I do not as I realize the make-up of the currency issuer. You don’t recognize the fundamental difference between a currency issuer and a currency user. You think everything operates the same.