Yes, but that doesn’t mean gold-standard parameters can’t be used. They often are, except when it comes to war.
Push the status quo further into the crapper? Are you serious? What about the workers and the poor who are constantly being stepped on by the status quo.
Are you asking if it’s causing inflation here or there? or perhaps globally? I’m not sure I understand the question, it’s not specific enough.
well, if it’s not sourced and peer reviewed, then by definition, it’s essentially an Op-Ed.
As a side note, I appreciate the link provided, I will be reading through some of the posts on that site when I get a little time for it.
You’re definitely losing me here. peer review is ESSENTIAL to scientific progress. Peer review is also based on integrity of data/facts presented. One doesn’t have to agree with the conclusions or opinions of an author to properly review their work. If you don’t believe in the concept of peer review, and consider that to be some sort of elitist form of rejecting ‘inconvenient or unpopular truths’ or something along those lines, then we really don’t have any common ground to work from.
Couldn’t the $100 billion sent to Ukraine have been spent on the American public and ended homelessness for the citizenry?
Oh, you mean like "printing money’ was the main cause of inflation in Zimbabwe? When printing money came after the lack of food production.
A short video I’ve posted before of Alan Greenspan facing down Paul Ryan with his awful position in privatizing SS, so that his owner donors have 1 more place to steal from the public https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNCZHAQnfGU Listen closely to what Greenspan says. As an Ayn Rand accolyte it must have been very hard for him to say this. Gotta love the defeated look on Ryan’s face.
Is it causing inflation in the country the money orginated in or the country it went to?
'Has it not been used for this purpose before? The concept, I have no problem with. If it manufactures consent-which I’m sure it has in the past-then everyone is fooled.
There have been like 5 people on several different threads you’ve started who have done this already.
And of course, you prove nothing.
You think a DEBATE would prove her nonsense more than actually submitting her work to be peer reviewed?
It only takes 26,000 dollars per year to be richer than 98% of the human population. I would never claim we have it bad in the US.
According to you and MMT
Explain to me how then, by the Treasury’s own admission, a balanced federal budget means “Revenue equals expenditures” (kind of like a personal budget) and that doesn’t add to the debt.
Clearly this strategy has worked before and more than likely would work again.
I already know your answer:
I’m just a brainwashed rube who can’t see the truth.
This will be followed by another question because that’s all you answer with. Newsflash: questions aren’t answers, conjecture is not fact, and despite what you say, “mainstream” things are often true.
Should people in the U.S. be judged against their own citizenry or that of the world?
When has it worked before and for whom did it work out for?
A balanced budget is just an accounting term “Revenue equals expenditures”
Anyone in the middle class or above in the 90s at the very least. Likely more.
Ooh look another question and no practical idea, solution, original thought, etc…
How pathetic.
And when were those balanced budget achieved?
What happened afterwards?
Talk about no original ideas, take a look in the mirror you just recite mainstream talking points. Seriously you ought to be over 19yrs. old to be on this forum.
Pay close attention: “The benefit of society” is decided by the same people you oppose. It won’t be to help you or other disabled folks; it’ll be to help them.
Brohan, 99% of that post was direct quotes from the speech you posted.
You’re 51 and bitter about losing a bartending job 12 years ago. You like ideas that sound great and appear to have no downsides. You claim to want to help people but by your own admission donate to animal charities…
I have a MS and a six figure salary. Donate to groups that actually help grow better humans and likely do more for animal conservation than you. You dare call me a child when your posts reek of an 18 year old college freshman spouting leftist ideals while never actually having participated in the world to develop an understanding. You’re a whiny toddler in a late middle aged man’s body. So used to a coddled life in the US you think the people here are worse off than those living Venezuela of all fucking places. You’ll be thanking my ass when the aircraft I work on are protecting your sorry behind from the inevitable attacks from the Chinese.
Terrorists killed over 3000 Americans…
He is the poster child for a loser, yet denigrates 19 year olds that I’m sure make more than him.