MJ: Innocent?

Being in another country, news still flowed through regularly on the case but probably not as much mud slinging and slagging off on one another as what has happened in the US media.

From what I read over many several months, as far as my brain can recall, the mother had previously tried to sue before to the tune of many thousands, and her son was at the centre. I also read previous accusations against another person were found to be unfounded.

Scammer alert?

On the topic of being accused, I know this country, Australia is having difficulty recruiting male teachers as many are not putting themselves in the position where their life and years of study go down the tube in an instant. Are there many sickos around and are the majority of perverts male? Yes.

I was discussing with my brother tonight how when we were both growing up, things that happened would be considered a term behind bars these days. Particularly as even today the guy stealing your house contents can slip off your roof or trip over your hose and sprinkler and then sue for all your life savings. Sad farking world. Anyway, back to the young days I remember not bringing my swimming gear and the teacher (female or male) would pull the top of your shorts towards her/him (this would happen to any student), take a look down your pants and say, ‘yeah, those underpants will do, get in’. How I dreaded swimming in my underpants. I remember as a kid and you had difficulty wiping your own arse properly or you’d be scared of the older kids kicking the doors in while you were squeezing your heart out, you’d ask a male teacher to take you to the crapper (restroom/toilet). When you grazed your upper leg or stomach after sliding across the concrete playing handball or fall into the garden full of thorns, the male or female teacher would dress your wound, wherever it was, and bandage it up. I think about today, and if a male teacher helped a kid in any of those situations he’d be branded by the community as a complete sicko and be behind bars. ‘Male teacher ‘fondles’ boys swimming’. ‘Teacher frequents toilet with young boy’.’ Teacher touches boy’s grazen legs’. If a female teacher did that today, that would be considered ok but even then, if a child pressed hard enough and say if money was involved, the woman would be (insert saying) ‘up shit creek without a paddle’.Now was I scarred for life? No. Could I sue today? Definitely.

What I’m getting at, I wouldn’t want to be a male teacher today. I consider myself a caring person, maybe possess some qualities that guys aren’t supposed to have. Someone hurts themselves, I’m there. But these days you see a kid in the shopping centre crying on their own, if you’re a guy, you keep walking. My gf could stop and pick the little boy or girl up though, she may even do it far more roughly than I would. No questions asked.

What I’m getting at, it’s sad sickos have ruined this world.

And lastly, any one of us, any of us could have a kid claim to be touched by us, as full of shit as it would be, our lives would be ruined, our jobs would be lost, and would your friends believe you? Probably not. Would others in society who don’t know you, believe you? Not a chance. Would they believe you if you were considered weird, say liked go-karting with kids? Go away sicko.

Money makes people do some truly evil things. Do I think Michael Jackson is weird? Yes. They even said he has the mind of a 12 year old. That’s crazy but even more sad.

I also read about the porn incident and how the boy claimed to be administered alcohol and subjected to porn by Michael Jackson. But later, it was revealed a family relativem of Michael Jackson, not sure if it was a young girl or boy, but they testified walking in and seeing the boy and another friend watching porn by themselves all alone. They were even drinking alcohol. It was said they even responded Michael Jackson did not know.

I don’t know what really happened as it wasn’t proven. I don’t really care quite honestly. But I do know one thing, through all the mountains of crap and yes Michael Jackson is farking weird as the come, but as a fact staring me straight in the face, the boy’s family have without doubt proven themselves to be liars and scammers.

They had a son sleeping in a bed with a weird rich man. Whether he was guilty or not, I personally believe even if it was without doubt he was innocent and Michael Jackson preferred heading off over to strip bars, the boy’s family would get a sniff and hunt down their money.

Imagine being one of the boy’s teachers. You wouldn’t go anywhere within several feet of the boy in class. They’d have to be an easy target in the mother’s sights.

[quote]rainjack wrote:
But I’ll rephrase the statement. I wouldn’t leave my son at his house to spend the night - would you?
[/quote]

But you’d let your son spend the night at another 40 year old man’s house?

[quote]Professor X wrote:
I agree with everything you wrote…except the idea that anyone knows he is a child molester. [/quote]

I just re-read your post. I never said that anyone knows he’s a child molester. I said I think he is child molester. I can’t prove it. The prosecution couldn’t prove it even though they were allowed to bring in anyone and anything even remotely associated MJ.

I never thought he should have been convicted in a circus court like the one that was assembled.

I just have a gut feeling about the guy. I’ve had one for several years.

[quote]Watson2K5 wrote:
rainjack wrote:
But I’ll rephrase the statement. I wouldn’t leave my son at his house to spend the night - would you?

But you’d let your son spend the night at another 40 year old man’s house?

[/quote]

WTF?

What does that have to do with anything? No I wouldn’t. I would assume the same thing about any adult that had a fondness for little boys.

While evidence is required for a conviction and I dont think the DA had enough to prove the case.

There has been enough of a reputation surrounding that man to make any sane parent keep their kids as far away as possible.

Also has anyone addressed the fact that this could be extortion? Apparently mom has tried to coerce money outta folks befor and that backround makes your claims more suspect. Not unbelievable period but suspect.

[quote]Professor X wrote:
rainjack wrote:
I think this case was more a comment on the blind tunnel vision of the DA.

Do I think that MJ is a child molester? Your damn right I do.

I agree with everything you wrote…except the idea that anyone knows he is a child molester. I think he is screwed up just like I wrote about months ago when he was first accused. I don’t think that alone equals “sex with kids”. He acts like a big kid himself. I think that means he may need professional help, but for anyone to act as if they “know” he molests children is just wrong. There has never been any evidence of that…just him in a big ass amusement park for a house. The dude has hung with kids since we were all kids. Not one of us has shit to say back in 1985 when he was going to awards shows with Bubbles and Webster. What changed? We grew up…he didn’t.[/quote]

Damn strong rebuttal! I’m impressed! I actually agree with something you wrote. Don’t start disapointing me now…

OD

[quote]rainjack wrote:
Watson2K5 wrote:
rainjack wrote:
But I’ll rephrase the statement. I wouldn’t leave my son at his house to spend the night - would you?

But you’d let your son spend the night at another 40 year old man’s house?

WTF?

What does that have to do with anything? No I wouldn’t. I would assume the same thing about any adult that had a fondness for little boys. [/quote]

Come on now… Don’t be a Pedophilaphobe you Homophobe! Just fagging with you… LOL. That’s some funny shit right there… I digress…

OD

I read an article in this mornings paper quoting a writer from (I believe from) Washington Post. Saying “he is still guilty of creeping me out”