Messed Up with a Girl. Help Needed

My question, then, would be, what is a reasonable amount of people to let in? Far leftists seem to have boundless “empathy” for the plight of anyone who isn’t white or a native born citizen. Too bad they don’t have the common sense to counterbalance their boundless “empathy.”

This is not and should not be a partisan issue
In the US (maybe the UK?) both parties are trying to capitalize off this manufactured crisis for their benefit. A nation that still believes in itself and that wants to thrive into the foreseeable future wouldn’t sell out on its people and welcome in foreign migrants who, to a large extent, leech off the system.

You won’t see migrants going to nations that are poor and that don’t have benefits, e.g. Bulgaria, Romania, Lithuania, Belarus. The migrant “crisis” will solve itself when the welfare state collapses in destination countries and it’s no longer beneficial for migrants to stay there. With native birth rates falling in all European nations, there won’t be enough people paying into the system to support leeches.

In the US, Social Security is bound to crash when the ratio of people paying into it isn’t high enough to support those collecting it. The welfare system can only take so much strain until it collapses or radical changes have to be made.

Let me say that I don’t believe any high-ranking politicians have the interests of their people at heart. Liberals will use the moral blackmail of “racism” and “bigotry” to push their population replacement agenda. Conservatives (at least in America) only put up the appearance of opposition immigration but they don’t really take a stand against it. They’re only too happy to have more cheap labor to fuel the corrupt system.

2 Likes
  1. What basis is there for gay marriage in society? White people have several thousand years of Judeo-Christian and pagan tradition, and all of a sunden, some people want to uproot tradation and base marriage one love. 130 years ago the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche asserted that the institution of marriage no longer has any meaning, being as it is found on an idiosyncrasy, “love.”

These days, you may love your sibling or a man may love his daughter and want to marry her. The Daily Wire is full of stories of perversion thataren’t usually covered by mainstream news. Some predict basing marriage on love will lead to the acceptance of pedophilia. Time will tell.

  1. Gay marriage was a good step in the right direction for whom? Certainly not for people who value family and tradition, and not to mention that it was legalized through the Supreme Court unconstitutionally. Teaching people “tolerance” and “acceptance” doesn’t entail wholesale acceptance of homosexuality as a norm, but that’s where we’re at now.

  2. America was, and is, founded on a lie. Don’t put much value into the popular slogans of this nation that never was.

2 Likes

The Daily Wire feeds you a load of bullshit. They sensationalize a lot of their stories and are just as bad at fear mongering as HuffPo or CNN. They’re so click baity it’s tough to take them seriously … and I like Shapiro.

The question you need to ask yourself is are the rates of these perversions changing than some other time (your baseline) and how are they changing and why…Cherry picking anecdotes does not necessarily indicate there’s any change in the baseline (i.e. previously established human behavior - isolated or otherwise).

You also want to consider whether the prevailing sentiment has changed wrt these incidents; i.e. how “acceptable” is it really to the average person…Daily Wire does NOT report on these things. They just give you tabloid reporting from a biased perspective.

And, again, I like Shapiro but his business model is largely based on click bait biased sensationalism.

Why? Are people who value family and tradition no longer allowed to value family and tradition? Do they not pass these things down? Or are a certain group of people now allowed to try to participate in said values and traditions that were previously “barred” - all that’s happened is new kinds of churches and ceremonies have been founded, i.e. worship has been deregulated…it’s free market religion dude.

Please elaborate.

3 Likes

Freedom.

Free people.

You know a lot of white Christians base marriage on love now too, right? I don’t see how gay people getting married affects you. I just think we’re a free people. Also, if you think America is founded on a lie, why not the Bible, or Christianity? Do you think religious values originated with Christians? I’m not saying they did or insulting your religion, I’m just wondering if you extend your skepticism to your own firmly held beliefs.

1 Like

Late to the party but wanted to say that in many countries, what he did wouldn’t be consideret rape or sexual violence of any kind, let alone if he’s from India, I’m 99.99% positive the authorities would take a good laugh at this story.
I know where I live something like this wouldn’t be considered a crime. Yes, he’s insisted, but she agreed to go ahead without condom, they’d both be considered responsible for the outcome. Maybe, just maybe, if it was possible to prove that he did it on purpose (not this case it seems, but just thinking out loud) there could be a fee/sanction to pay to the victim, at best.

He’s a total dickhead of course and I’d lean towards a random internet troll whose only ejaculations so far have been inside socks.

3 Likes

We’re past the fluidity of rape definitions, past the fluidity of gender, and well into the gay debate, so either hate on some gays or back me up because you’re killin my vibe bro

Da fuck. It’s 2018 and people are still hating on gays?

Can we get to more important topics like giving all workers ownership of the means of production without the force of government and hamsters?

2 Likes

I’m just saying, with overpopulation being a pressing concern, maybe an agenda based around limiting reproduction would be a positive thing. We are already brining up 19th century German existentialists, so what would Schopenhauer say?

2 Likes

Do you actually answer one question with another question? Are you actually a left wing idiot?

Not just white people, the whole planet.

What was once a crime is now protected by law. The way things are going, the bible will soon be banned as hate speech.

Leviticus 20: 13
If a man has sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They are to be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads.

Not trying to argue for that, just showing you how far from tradition things have gone.

1 Like

Leviticus is definitely my favorite book in the Bible, with some of these greatest hits

“And if a woman have an issue, and her issue in her flesh be blood, she shall be put apart seven days: and whosoever toucheth her shall be unclean until the even. And every thing that she lieth upon in her separation shall be unclean: every thing also that she sitteth upon shall be unclean. And whosoever toucheth her bed shall wash his clothes, and bathe himself in water, and be unclean until the even.” Leviticus 15:19-21

And who can forget

“Ye shall keep my statutes. Thou shalt not let thy cattle gender with a diverse kind: thou shalt not sow thy field with mingled seed: neither shall a garment mingled of linen and woollen come upon thee.” Leviticus 19:19

1 Like

How Scientists Created Healthy Baby Mice from Two Female Mice and What It Means For the Future of Same-Sex Reproduction - News18.

Don’t worry I’m just being irritating I know this doesn’t carry over lol however I do disagree with you’re arguement.

Many people don’t value tradition, especially if said tradition is flawed. In my opinion there are progressive and static traditions. Progressive tradition is a tradition that is open to change, therefore engrained ideologies don’t become trapped in said tradition forever, static tradition is one that refuses to change for any reason… Most religions (orthodox judaism, Catholicism etc) are perfect examples of this. What may be “traditional” values to you regarding morality and what should be acceptable will be different to another, however as society progresses as a whole, the few who try keep age old traditions tend to fall behind the times and end up living in their own little world with their community (no offence).

Child marriage is a tradition that has been largely abolished as it was unacceptable. I’m not saying the way society is turning out is good or right, however traditional values (in my opinion) won’t get us anywhere with regard to changing the current political/ social climate of today. Either way I wouldn’t worry about it, the far left and the far right are a small minority, they won’t take over and rise up, controlling the rest of society. It does seem as if many individuals on the further end of the right wing/conservative spectrum are extremely paranoid about things that are unlikely to happen, like a home invasion, immigrants taking over and all that BS.

Are you talking about like … The Kardashians and trash like that. The simplest and easiest way to avoid these “corrosive” influences is to simply not watch those shows. Now as a child I was never particularly impressionable, possibly because Ive never had anyone I consider to be a “role model” that guides and/or directs my life, and I always saw through the bullshit/ false realities shown in the media [quote=“mikebarnes, post:543, topic:247811”]
I would not want homosexual children because homosexual children cannot pass on inherited traits
[/quote]

I disagree here, surrogate mothers are now a thing. The reason I wouldn’t want a homosexual child has nothing to do with me, it’s because unfortunately, life as a homosexual is more difficult, you have to put up with hatred, stigma, bullying based on the individuals sexual orientation, and I wouldn’t want my kid to have to go through that ordeal. That being said I’m not going to be able to have kids anyway lol

Oh totally! Politics is slimy business, corruption is rampant, most only have their own agendas at heart, but then again can you say it’s any different for the general populace, most people only do things with their best interests at heart

This isn’t going to happen, marriage between two consenting adults doesn’t harm anyone. An adult marrying a child who hasn’t the ability to consent is harmful to the child, therefore you can’t draw a conclusion between gay marriage and pedomarriage

Let’s put it this way, most countries that still outlaw gay marriage/ homosexuality are low income countries with typically uneducated citizens, hatred towards gays stems from stone age old traditions, ignorance and miseducation in my opinion, and as society has progressed with regard to education, an emphasis on science over religion and human rights have become more focused on, acceptance toward homosexuality is (rightfully so) being pushed, as there is no reason to dislike homosexuals for a decision that is completely out of their control.

Slavery and racism used to be tradition in America, why not hold up that tradition too? (This arguement is just as flawed as the pedomarriage arguement but you get my point)

Saying because gay marriage is legalised will turn to everything marriage being legalised is the same as the arguements “well if physician assisted euthanasia is legalised for terminally ill patients, then soon everyone will be killing themselves/other people via physician assisted euthanasia”… Well… No, the documentation process to euthanize oneself will be LENGTHY, as suicide is no laughing matter, if it’s approved for terminally ill patients, that doesn’t mean any average Joe can opt to have his parents euthanized for insurance money… That’s not how it works.

Also I’m fairly sure someone will reply to this with a nice juicy insult. I’m not going to reply to anyone who speaks to me in a derogatory manner

1 Like

So should sex with animals be legal too on the basis of “freedom”? It was recently legalized in Canada, as long as no vaginal or anal penetration is involved.

“Lawyers for the man, who was also convicted on 13 counts of sexually molesting his two stepdaughters over a 10-year period, argued that the 1954 law prohibiting bestiality had a specific meaning: vaginal or anal penetration of an animal. The Supreme Court justices agreed, saying it would be inappropriate for courts to expand that definition beyond what was intended by the politicians who drafted the legislation.”
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/supreme-court-clarifies-canadas-bestiality-law-with-ruling/article30371581/

Where do you draw the line? There is a group called NAMBLA (North American Man-Boy Love Association) that wants pedophilia to be legalized. The argument is that some kids are attracted to older people, including grown men, and want to have sex with them. It’s unfair to deny them the right to consent - it is an infringement of their freedom.

I’m glad I saw this. As I watch the same Ted Cruz ad on TV lol.

Many cultures see menstruation as unclean. In India, menstruating women are not allowed to enter Hindu temples. Maxi pads and tampons are recent inventions. But whatever, maybe you’re one of those guys who fucks girls on their period.

Also keep in mind that not all the laws in the Bible call for the death penalty.

You type too much and half of it isn’t serious, get to the point because I can’t read all that.

What say you about wearing mixed cloths? And I would hope you consume no animal fat.

Or pork.

1 Like

I don’t eat pork actually, mostly because I just find it disgusting. And I’m allergic to shellfish. As far as consuming animal fat, that’s talking about burnt offerings. And wearing mixed cloths, aren’t poly-cotton blends just cheap shit anyway?

Lets hope you aren’t a wizard, speaking of death penalties

A man or a woman who is a medium or a wizard shall be put to death; they shall be stoned to death, their blood is upon them.-Leviticus 20:27

1 Like