[quote]Dr. Pangloss wrote:
[quote]Pearsy92 wrote:
What if you sold the house or donated it to charity or went around the house destroying everything and ripping up the plumbing and making it un-renovationable?
I am talking serious I don’t care if i go homeless and jobless for awhile as long as this gold digger gets nothing. Quit your job, have your cars crushed, give away the house or destroy it, destroy or give away all valuable possessions.
Would that end up with you going to prison?
If I am someone with a great education and who has been a successful business owner I would honestly rather do that than give some leech anything. I mean you can always get it back if you ave the education and experience being a successful business man.
[/quote]
Now you’re thinking like a woman.
A divorce is a BUSINESS decision - a breach of contract - and it should be treated like one. Imo, this is where a great divorce attorney can really distinguish himself. Not by fucking over your spouse, but by sitting you down and making you realize that fighting over who gets the damn china makes no financial sense when you’re each paying a lawyer $400 an hour.
If you go into business with a partner and after some amount of time decide to close shop, do you torch your inventory and burn whatever money is in the bank? No. You split it up, lick your wounds, learn from your experience, and move on. A divorce is no different.
Stop thinking like a woman.
[/quote]
Relationships are not a business deal, in a business partnership you are exactly that, partners. if I spent 20 years building a multi million dollar company and my wife was a house wife or worked a part time job just because she wanted to work, the notion I should just give her half of everything I built and " lick my wounds" is madness.
The idea of giving away all my assets out of principle rather than being extorted by someone for half is acting like a woman who is demanding half my assets for merely being in a mutually consenting relationship is the equivalent of saying just give in and accept the moral validity of a law that entitles someone to take half of your stuff for the mere fact they have a vagina.
This goes against every single notion of equality and freedom, both economic, morally, politically and Legislatively.
It really isn’t even about the money, it is the pure entitlement that some actually thinks begin a wife entitles them to millions of pounds because their husband was a famous sports player. How many 3 pointers did the wife hit? Why should she be compensated, she lived the high life and yet she is now deemed entitled to more and for continued upkeep on top of the wealth she will receive.
Telling people to just get over a loss of civil rights, or a robbery or anything that affects their freedom, their lively hood or their earned wealth is just not something i think is very supportable.
Thinking like a woman would be to demand alimony from the woman in the form of pussy payments, to keep their standard of living the same as before they divorced.