“We all want to see.” I don’t.
What strikes me as the saddest part of al the hoopla surrounding tha Dems and the Reps,is the total lack of coverage
on some of the lesser known parties.The Liberterian party ideal has always appealed to me.It’s just a shame that most of the LIB. candidates seem,or are at least made to appear,a little wacky.Just my .02
please don’t vote george dubya back in
I think Dean helped himself out greatly with a guest shot on Letterman last night!
Lumberjack-The odds of any of the democratic candidates beating Bush are quite slim. If the economy stays at least as strong as it is and there is continued progress in Iraq, Bush wins in a walk.
Yeah, Bush will probably win, guaranteeing another four years of us stomping around the world like a druken bully in a biker bar, despoiling our environment, using the religious right as our national moral compass, and allowing the richest people in the U.S. to treat the government like their personal piggy banks.
But. . .
Maybe not. Maybe a Democrat who is willing to put it all on the line can pull off the upset.
Now, you know Bush is going to fight dirty. He fought dirty against John McCain and he fought dirty against Al Gore. Gore in particular was so goddamn genteel that he let Bush steal Florida without a fight.
So I guess what I want in a Democratic nominee is someone who will FIGHT–not dirty, but hard. Someone who will make us forget those pussies Gore, Dukakis, and Mondale. Someone who will mobilize the righteous anger that the majority of Americans should have.
I don’t know that Dean is the ONLY one who will fight like hell, but he is one who will. Will Kerry? I have my doubts. Edwards? I like his politics, but will he end up like a deer in the headlights if he wins the nomination? Clark might be the best combination. Frankly, I would be happy with any of those four WINNING, but even if we lose, I want to be sure that we go down fighting Bush with our last breath.