You set up the rules for what is a valid study and then dismiss the study when it doesn’t meet your criteria. Now others can take a look at the study and see if they want the vastly increased risk of male breast cancer that was ONLY associated with “circulating estradiol levels”. Not T status or androgen status. Just “circulating estradiol levels”.
And now that I’ve demolished your “study is bogus” BS I will indeed provide studies that show direct harm from Estrogen. But these are for the readers and not to satisfy any of your pre-conditions for a “valid study”.
Lowering estrogen prevents memory decline in menopausal females
This is a rat study. We have been studying estradiol for over 80 years in HUMANS.
Another pre-condition lol
You call that a pre-condition?? That I’d like to see human studies instead of rat studies?? Now you’re sending me a MOUSE study??
RAT study. Can you even read???
Here is literature in HUMANS! Unless you’re not a human and human biology doesn’t apply to you?
I mean this is honestly hilarious regardless of what side you’re on.
1 Like
1 Like
The latest debate erupted last year when Dr. Robert Smart, a researcher at North Carolina State University, reported that the female hormone estrogen harmed hair follicle growth, and hence played a role in baldness . Published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Smart’s research entailed clipping off the hair of three groups of mice. One group then was coated with a chemical that arrested hair growth for a prolonged period. Two control groups received chemicals that had a minimal effect. When Smart treated the denuded skin of the first group with an estrogen-blocking drug, their hair follicles responded. Within 10 weeks, the mice produced coats so thick they were indistinguishable from untreated mice. Smart says the estrogen blocker prevented normal estrogen stimulation and hair growth was the result .”
Hey hey
I read every link you sent me. You haven’t read anything I sent you. Instead you’re posting things that have nothing to do with the topic.
I asked for evidence that lowering estradiol demonstrates improved health and you’re sending me rat studies, mouse studies, and irrelevant bullshit that has no place here.
YOU have no place here. I provide evidence upon request. Those are just a few studies I have regarding AI toxicity. I have 120 papers ready to drown you with just from the prep from that debate. It’s not cherry picking. You don’t get this stuff and are wasting my time as usual.
When you ask me for evidence I provide actual RELEVANT evidence and you provide BS.
When it went from rat, and rat wasn’t good, to mouse, I literally lost it. Best thing I’ve seen in a while 
1 Like
Your studies are on women who are forced to reduce their estrogen levels to zero in order to prolong their lives. Completely useless information for men who are managing their estrogen levels to receive the full benefits of TRT
2 Likes