[quote]MattyXL wrote:
Id hit it…[/quote]
With a cinder block…
[quote]Ct. Rockula wrote:
[quote]Edevus wrote:
[quote]Ct. Rockula wrote:
[quote]lewhitehurst wrote:
[quote]Ct. Rockula wrote:
[quote]lewhitehurst wrote:
[quote]Otto the Ecto wrote:
Fat bitch probably causes more environmental damage from the amount of food needed to be produced to feed her ass.
Not to mention the Co2 she must be constantly exhaling with her bullshit talking. [/quote]
This[/quote]
Lol this is a site geared toward athletes. We all eat more food than we need…we eat more than the average chubber. But this is always ignored. Why?
Lol[/quote]
Because we aren’t running up to strangers in parking lots berating them and using profanity in front of their kids. And if she is going to attack them personally it is only fair that she be attacked personally.
[/quote]
You really think people on this ite don’t run up to people in public and disrespect them like that?
That wasn’t really the point I was getting at though. It has nothing to do with her. I’m curious, do you think your carbon foorprint or whatever the term may be is smaller than a fat person?[/quote]
Quite often I read your posts and a Spanish saying pops in my mind. It’s something like “Thinks the thief that everyone else is a thief”.
[/quote]
No one gives a fuck lol[/quote]
I do and that’s all I need.
[quote]Ct. Rockula wrote:
[quote]lewhitehurst wrote:
[quote]Otto the Ecto wrote:
Fat bitch probably causes more environmental damage from the amount of food needed to be produced to feed her ass.
Not to mention the Co2 she must be constantly exhaling with her bullshit talking. [/quote]
This[/quote]
Lol this is a site geared toward athletes. We all eat more food than we need…we eat more than the average chubber. But this is always ignored. Why?
Lol[/quote]
The reason that this apparent contradiction/hypocrisy has gained traction is simple: it isn’t really a double-standard at all.
You see, we all eat more than what is normal (aside from the V-Diet crowd) and likewise spend an inequitable amount of Co2 when we expend extra effort while working out. But this is simply the byproduct of a natural tendency on the part of all those who work out regularly, namely the tendency to be a productive member of society in some way, shape or form in other areas of our lives.
Invariably, the same cannot be said for people who are fat purely as a result of an aggressive pattern of active…inaction. Fatties are fat because they do nothing but consume, and this is what defines them. Fatties consume and do not replace; WE consume, but we also replace to varying degrees. So the reality is that the two demographics bear no comparison to each other.
One is justified in its consumption and the other is not, and that is indisputable. Because of this unwavering absolute we naturally don’t make any correlation between the two types of consumers, because any comparison would prove inappropriate even under minimal scrutiny and they are simply two polar opposite entities.
OP, I’m amazed you guys held your composure like that. What a total B!
Anyway, aren’t Prius’ more environmentally unfriendly on account of the damage the nickel mining, export and transport consumes in manufacturing their batteries?
If you’re driving a Prius to save money, use diesel. If it’s an environmental statement you’re making, use public transport.
[quote]DBCooper wrote:
[quote]Ct. Rockula wrote:
[quote]lewhitehurst wrote:
[quote]Otto the Ecto wrote:
Fat bitch probably causes more environmental damage from the amount of food needed to be produced to feed her ass.
Not to mention the Co2 she must be constantly exhaling with her bullshit talking. [/quote]
This[/quote]
Lol this is a site geared toward athletes. We all eat more food than we need…we eat more than the average chubber. But this is always ignored. Why?
Lol[/quote]
The reason that this apparent contradiction/hypocrisy has gained traction is simple: it isn’t really a double-standard at all.
You see, we all eat more than what is normal (aside from the V-Diet crowd) and likewise spend an inequitable amount of Co2 when we expend extra effort while working out. But this is simply the byproduct of a natural tendency on the part of all those who work out regularly, namely the tendency to be a productive member of society in some way, shape or form in other areas of our lives.
Invariably, the same cannot be said for people who are fat purely as a result of an aggressive pattern of active…inaction. Fatties are fat because they do nothing but consume, and this is what defines them. Fatties consume and do not replace; WE consume, but we also replace to varying degrees. So the reality is that the two demographics bear no comparison to each other.
One is justified in its consumption and the other is not, and that is indisputable. Because of this unwavering absolute we naturally don’t make any correlation between the two types of consumers, because any comparison would prove inappropriate even under minimal scrutiny and they are simply two polar opposite entities.[/quote]
Ahhh thank you, puppet.
[quote]Edevus wrote:
[quote]Ct. Rockula wrote:
[quote]Edevus wrote:
[quote]Ct. Rockula wrote:
[quote]lewhitehurst wrote:
[quote]Ct. Rockula wrote:
[quote]lewhitehurst wrote:
[quote]Otto the Ecto wrote:
Fat bitch probably causes more environmental damage from the amount of food needed to be produced to feed her ass.
Not to mention the Co2 she must be constantly exhaling with her bullshit talking. [/quote]
This[/quote]
Lol this is a site geared toward athletes. We all eat more food than we need…we eat more than the average chubber. But this is always ignored. Why?
Lol[/quote]
Because we aren’t running up to strangers in parking lots berating them and using profanity in front of their kids. And if she is going to attack them personally it is only fair that she be attacked personally.
[/quote]
You really think people on this ite don’t run up to people in public and disrespect them like that?
That wasn’t really the point I was getting at though. It has nothing to do with her. I’m curious, do you think your carbon foorprint or whatever the term may be is smaller than a fat person?[/quote]
Quite often I read your posts and a Spanish saying pops in my mind. It’s something like “Thinks the thief that everyone else is a thief”.
[/quote]
No one gives a fuck lol[/quote]
I do and that’s all I need.
[/quote]
So why ramble it to me? No one cares about Spain or your crazy sayings.
[quote]DBCooper wrote:
The reason that this apparent contradiction/hypocrisy has gained traction is simple: it isn’t really a double-standard at all.
You see, we all eat more than what is normal (aside from the V-Diet crowd) and likewise spend an inequitable amount of Co2 when we expend extra effort while working out. But this is simply the byproduct of a natural tendency on the part of all those who work out regularly, namely the tendency to be a productive member of society in some way, shape or form in other areas of our lives.
Invariably, the same cannot be said for people who are fat purely as a result of an aggressive pattern of active…inaction. Fatties are fat because they do nothing but consume, and this is what defines them. Fatties consume and do not replace; WE consume, but we also replace to varying degrees. So the reality is that the two demographics bear no comparison to each other.
One is justified in its consumption and the other is not, and that is indisputable. Because of this unwavering absolute we naturally don’t make any correlation between the two types of consumers, because any comparison would prove inappropriate even under minimal scrutiny and they are simply two polar opposite entities.[/quote]
This is some serious bullshit. You know many if not most fat people are productive members of society right?
Neither the level of consumption by fat people or weight lifters is justifiable in a world of over population and millions starving.
[quote]Ct. Rockula wrote:
So why ramble it to me? No one cares about Spain or your crazy sayings.[/quote]
You understood nothing.
Why would you assume that people at T-Nation go to strangers and act rude? Only because you would do it yourself. Why would you assume that everybody cheat on their SO? Because you would do it yourself. And so on.
A thief thinks that everyone else is also a thief. Quite often from your posts I see this and I see no other explanation.
Got it now?
[quote]Edevus wrote:
[quote]Ct. Rockula wrote:
So why ramble it to me? No one cares about Spain or your crazy sayings.[/quote]
You understood nothing.
Why would you assume that people at T-Nation go to strangers and act rude? Only because you would do it yourself. Why would you assume that everybody cheat on their SO? Because you would do it yourself. And so on.
A thief thinks that everyone else is also a thief. Quite often from your posts I see this and I see no other explanation.
Got it now? [/quote]
Lol I understood it the first time.
Let me ask you…do you think people on this site are saints in real life?
The numbers do not lend themselves to that at all. There are probably dudes here who superset beating their wives and kids with posts on the forum. That’s the reality of being alive…not everyone is good. With any kind of life experience under your belt you should know this, right?
But you seem like a rigid guy who refuses to decode so I will guess that this is not going to register with you.
Eh, the relationship thing can be discussed in sama at some point if you’d like.
[quote]Mad HORSE wrote:
Was that you, OP, or a Youtube video you found?
Regardless, I would have started the truck and held it at about 6 grand to drown her out.
Silly, self righteous cooze.
You’re a better man than me if that was you.[/quote]
yup.
edit: do these people not realize there being recorded?
[quote]Ct. Rockula wrote:
[quote]Edevus wrote:
[quote]Ct. Rockula wrote:
So why ramble it to me? No one cares about Spain or your crazy sayings.[/quote]
You understood nothing.
Why would you assume that people at T-Nation go to strangers and act rude? Only because you would do it yourself. Why would you assume that everybody cheat on their SO? Because you would do it yourself. And so on.
A thief thinks that everyone else is also a thief. Quite often from your posts I see this and I see no other explanation.
Got it now? [/quote]
Lol I understood it the first time.
Let me ask you…do you think people on this site are saints in real life?
The numbers do not lend themselves to that at all. There are probably dudes here who superset beating their wives and kids with posts on the forum. That’s the reality of being alive…not everyone is good. With any kind of life experience under your belt you should know this, right?
But you seem like a rigid guy who refuses to decode so I will guess that this is not going to register with you.
Eh, the relationship thing can be discussed in sama at some point if you’d like. [/quote]
People on this site are a mix of everything, good and bad, that’s obvious, but your post seemed to say like, if it’s the normal and general thing to do, same with cheating. You were talking like if women were totally irrational animals who can’t control themselves.
[quote]Edevus wrote:
[quote]Ct. Rockula wrote:
[quote]Edevus wrote:
[quote]Ct. Rockula wrote:
So why ramble it to me? No one cares about Spain or your crazy sayings.[/quote]
You understood nothing.
Why would you assume that people at T-Nation go to strangers and act rude? Only because you would do it yourself. Why would you assume that everybody cheat on their SO? Because you would do it yourself. And so on.
A thief thinks that everyone else is also a thief. Quite often from your posts I see this and I see no other explanation.
Got it now? [/quote]
Lol I understood it the first time.
Let me ask you…do you think people on this site are saints in real life?
The numbers do not lend themselves to that at all. There are probably dudes here who superset beating their wives and kids with posts on the forum. That’s the reality of being alive…not everyone is good. With any kind of life experience under your belt you should know this, right?
But you seem like a rigid guy who refuses to decode so I will guess that this is not going to register with you.
Eh, the relationship thing can be discussed in sama at some point if you’d like. [/quote]
People on this site are a mix of everything, good and bad, that’s obvious, but your post seemed to say like, if it’s the normal and general thing to do, same with cheating. You were talking like if women were totally irrational animals who can’t control themselves.
[/quote]
When I say people are animals I never mean live without self control. By saying things like that I’m reminding you that its never a bad thing to have a connection with your primal roots. The disconnect humans are experiencing from nature is a cause for many of our current problems. Letting the id guide you every now and then is a good thing.
Try not to take what I say literally.
[quote]XanderBuilt wrote:
OP, I’m amazed you guys held your composure like that. What a total B!
Anyway, aren’t Prius’ more environmentally unfriendly on account of the damage the nickel mining, export and transport consumes in manufacturing their batteries?
If you’re driving a Prius to save money, use diesel. If it’s an environmental statement you’re making, use public transport.[/quote]
prius is lithium ion battery, honda insight is nickle metal hydrid…
Also, you save more money at the pump with a hybrid gas then a diesel, because we tax deisel more in this country, i did the math on that already…
and yes, im down to either the volt or the insight …
[quote]Ratchet wrote:
[quote]XanderBuilt wrote:
OP, I’m amazed you guys held your composure like that. What a total B!
Anyway, aren’t Prius’ more environmentally unfriendly on account of the damage the nickel mining, export and transport consumes in manufacturing their batteries?
If you’re driving a Prius to save money, use diesel. If it’s an environmental statement you’re making, use public transport.[/quote]
prius is lithium ion battery, honda insight is nickle metal hydrid…
Also, you save more money at the pump with a hybrid gas then a diesel, because we tax deisel more in this country, i did the math on that already…
and yes, im down to either the volt or the insight …
[/quote]
But aren’t they all non-recyclable and worst for the environment that driving a straight piped muscle car? I read that some where…
[quote]therajraj wrote:
[quote]DBCooper wrote:
The reason that this apparent contradiction/hypocrisy has gained traction is simple: it isn’t really a double-standard at all.
You see, we all eat more than what is normal (aside from the V-Diet crowd) and likewise spend an inequitable amount of Co2 when we expend extra effort while working out. But this is simply the byproduct of a natural tendency on the part of all those who work out regularly, namely the tendency to be a productive member of society in some way, shape or form in other areas of our lives.
Invariably, the same cannot be said for people who are fat purely as a result of an aggressive pattern of active…inaction. Fatties are fat because they do nothing but consume, and this is what defines them. Fatties consume and do not replace; WE consume, but we also replace to varying degrees. So the reality is that the two demographics bear no comparison to each other.
One is justified in its consumption and the other is not, and that is indisputable. Because of this unwavering absolute we naturally don’t make any correlation between the two types of consumers, because any comparison would prove inappropriate even under minimal scrutiny and they are simply two polar opposite entities.[/quote]
This is some serious bullshit. You know many if not most fat people are productive members of society right?
Neither the level of consumption by fat people or weight lifters is justifiable in a world of over population and millions starving.
[/quote]
Then do what’s right for the future of the planet and kill yourself, you dense fucking idiot.
[quote]DBCooper wrote:
[quote]therajraj wrote:
[quote]DBCooper wrote:
The reason that this apparent contradiction/hypocrisy has gained traction is simple: it isn’t really a double-standard at all.
You see, we all eat more than what is normal (aside from the V-Diet crowd) and likewise spend an inequitable amount of Co2 when we expend extra effort while working out. But this is simply the byproduct of a natural tendency on the part of all those who work out regularly, namely the tendency to be a productive member of society in some way, shape or form in other areas of our lives.
Invariably, the same cannot be said for people who are fat purely as a result of an aggressive pattern of active…inaction. Fatties are fat because they do nothing but consume, and this is what defines them. Fatties consume and do not replace; WE consume, but we also replace to varying degrees. So the reality is that the two demographics bear no comparison to each other.
One is justified in its consumption and the other is not, and that is indisputable. Because of this unwavering absolute we naturally don’t make any correlation between the two types of consumers, because any comparison would prove inappropriate even under minimal scrutiny and they are simply two polar opposite entities.[/quote]
This is some serious bullshit. You know many if not most fat people are productive members of society right?
Neither the level of consumption by fat people or weight lifters is justifiable in a world of over population and millions starving.
[/quote]
Then do what’s right for the future of the planet and kill yourself, you dense fucking idiot.[/quote]
Brought to you by RAPEAXE
[quote]DBCooper wrote:
[quote]therajraj wrote:
[quote]DBCooper wrote:
The reason that this apparent contradiction/hypocrisy has gained traction is simple: it isn’t really a double-standard at all.
You see, we all eat more than what is normal (aside from the V-Diet crowd) and likewise spend an inequitable amount of Co2 when we expend extra effort while working out. But this is simply the byproduct of a natural tendency on the part of all those who work out regularly, namely the tendency to be a productive member of society in some way, shape or form in other areas of our lives.
Invariably, the same cannot be said for people who are fat purely as a result of an aggressive pattern of active…inaction. Fatties are fat because they do nothing but consume, and this is what defines them. Fatties consume and do not replace; WE consume, but we also replace to varying degrees. So the reality is that the two demographics bear no comparison to each other.
One is justified in its consumption and the other is not, and that is indisputable. Because of this unwavering absolute we naturally don’t make any correlation between the two types of consumers, because any comparison would prove inappropriate even under minimal scrutiny and they are simply two polar opposite entities.[/quote]
This is some serious bullshit. You know many if not most fat people are productive members of society right?
Neither the level of consumption by fat people or weight lifters is justifiable in a world of over population and millions starving.
[/quote]
Then do what’s right for the future of the planet and kill yourself, you dense fucking idiot.[/quote]
You first, you delusional fucktard.
[quote]therajraj wrote:
[quote]DBCooper wrote:
[quote]therajraj wrote:
[quote]DBCooper wrote:
The reason that this apparent contradiction/hypocrisy has gained traction is simple: it isn’t really a double-standard at all.
You see, we all eat more than what is normal (aside from the V-Diet crowd) and likewise spend an inequitable amount of Co2 when we expend extra effort while working out. But this is simply the byproduct of a natural tendency on the part of all those who work out regularly, namely the tendency to be a productive member of society in some way, shape or form in other areas of our lives.
Invariably, the same cannot be said for people who are fat purely as a result of an aggressive pattern of active…inaction. Fatties are fat because they do nothing but consume, and this is what defines them. Fatties consume and do not replace; WE consume, but we also replace to varying degrees. So the reality is that the two demographics bear no comparison to each other.
One is justified in its consumption and the other is not, and that is indisputable. Because of this unwavering absolute we naturally don’t make any correlation between the two types of consumers, because any comparison would prove inappropriate even under minimal scrutiny and they are simply two polar opposite entities.[/quote]
This is some serious bullshit. You know many if not most fat people are productive members of society right?
Neither the level of consumption by fat people or weight lifters is justifiable in a world of over population and millions starving.
[/quote]
Then do what’s right for the future of the planet and kill yourself, you dense fucking idiot.[/quote]
You first, you delusional fucktard.
[/quote]
BAM!
okay, now your turn
This has nothing to do with carbon emissions. She had a cell phone in one hand, a pen in the other and her opening complaint was about the noise of the engine.
Still an excessively moany bitch when a polite “would you mind turning off your engine for a moment, please? I’m trying to take a call” would’ve sufficed.