Libby is Guilty?!

Off Topic Politics & World Issues
81

[quote]JeffR wrote:
That’s tantamount to making us accomplices.
[/quote]

Bite me!

The US, is not only an accomplice, but has directly and repeatedly committed atrocities.
The claim that you “applauded” while Saddam was committing genocide is nothing new. The NY Times front page from August 18, 2002 read “Officers Say US Aided Iraq in War Despite Use of Gas”. But you wouldn’t know, being under a rock and all…

One word: Proxy.

You can’t possibly quote W and be taken seriously.

[quote]Now you are quoting the Israeli’s!?!

Seriously, cut it out. I can’t believe you have the gall. So, in essence, you believe the Israeli’s ONLY when they toe your line? You vehemently refute their assessment of hamas’ intentions, iranian ties, etc… Pretty sick if you give it more than 1 second of thought.[/quote]

What’s wrong with quoting Israelis? They were at war with iraq for as long as their state existed. They were at risk if the WMDs were real. However, some of them had the good judgement to see that it’ll only make the M.E. even more volatile a place than it already is.

And when did I ever “vehemently refute their assessment of Hamas”?

Saddam was a thug, but he couldn’t dream of getting into the same league as your government. His horrors ended with him; Yours are instutionalized. Lucky for them, the public is too busy/lazy/nonchalant/dumb to notice.

82

[quote]lixy wrote:
Then you applauded while he was gasing the Kurds.

[/quote]

Aplauded? Are you serious? Do you even comprehend what you’re saying?

Sorry, but I gotta throw the bullshit flag on this one.

83

[quote]lixy wrote:
You can’t possibly quote W and be taken seriously.
[/quote]

You can’t possibly quote the NYT and be taken seriously

84

[quote]lixy wrote:
JeffR wrote:
That’s tantamount to making us accomplices.

Bite me!

The US, is not only an accomplice, but has directly and repeatedly committed atrocities.
The claim that you “applauded” while Saddam was committing genocide is nothing new. The NY Times front page from August 18, 2002 read “Officers Say US Aided Iraq in War Despite Use of Gas”. But you wouldn’t know, being under a rock and all…

If you don’t change that “applause” crap, I hope you are banned from this site and your IP address noted so you can’t change your name.

One word: Proxy.

Your brain cannot process the myriad of other reasons to take out saddam. I refuse to link another 2003 W. speech because you won’t read it.

You can’t possibly quote W and be taken seriously.

Now you are quoting the Israeli’s!?!

Seriously, cut it out. I can’t believe you have the gall. So, in essence, you believe the Israeli’s ONLY when they toe your line? You vehemently refute their assessment of hamas’ intentions, iranian ties, etc… Pretty sick if you give it more than 1 second of thought.

What’s wrong with quoting Israelis? They were at war with iraq for as long as their state existed. They were at risk if the WMDs were real. However, some of them had the good judgement to see that it’ll only make the M.E. even more volatile a place than it already is.

And when did I ever “vehemently refute their assessment of Hamas”?

Get serious. You do know that we have the right to defend against an aggressive dictator who fires on our planes, provides free advertising to our most hated enemy, bin laden, lied about his wmd, worked to circumvent the cease fire agreement, paid palestinian terrorist families to attack our allies. On and on and on.

Saddam was a thug, but he couldn’t dream of getting into the same league as your government. His horrors ended with him; Yours are instutionalized. Lucky for them, the public is too busy/lazy/nonchalant/dumb to notice.[/quote]

lixy, you are a poisonous snake.

Saying we are worse than saddam ends your usefulness.

I ask that everyone search their conscience and decide whether this malignant presence should be encouraged.

I’m finished with him.

JeffR