[quote]JustTheFacts wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
Let me get this straight. These are all things JTF has posted in the last couple days.
The US is making fake videos of bin Laden.
The US keeps forgetting to make bin Laden take credit for the attacks.
Bin Laden is dead (unless he is denying his involvement).
I don’t see the problem – he was alive after 9/11 and denied doing it, and he probably died within the last 6 years. He CERTAINLY did not get YOUNGER.
So here is a question for you. 10 days after Bush’s inauguration, regime change in Iraq was topic “A” according to then cabinet member Paul O’Neil – how was the Bush administration going to justify “Iraqi liberation” to the American people and the WORLD without 9/11? (Especially since he just got done campaigning on his “no nation building” platform)
2004 “60 Minutes” Interview with 2001-2003 Secretary of the Treasury, Paul O’Neil
War not realistic option before 9/11
3/23/2004
Democrats and Republicans alike told a bipartisan commission Tuesday that neither U.S. nor world opinion would have stood for such aggression before the fall of 2001. It was only after the Sept. 11 attacks that public opinion here and abroad changed enough to make an invasion politically possible.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2004-03-23-war-analysis_x.htm[/quote]
Since reime change in Iraq was a national policy implemented by Clinton I don’t see the problem.