[quote]TC wrote:
It’s Christmas, you know. I thought that rather than slapping in some pics that would cause a nauseatingly long thread on whether the poster would choose to “hit it,” I’d put in something a little contemplative.
[/quote]
It was a nice change for the few days of Christmas bustle. Thanks.
[quote]TShaw wrote:
disciplined wrote:
… Fitness/athletic/sports chicks, I can understand… but bimbos are a dime-a-dozen and not bodybuilding-related.
Hey, maybe I’m just crazy.
You’re not crazy; you just need to broaden your mind. It’s a web-site devoted to Testosterone and the related topics of bodybuilding, powerlifting, MMA, supplements/nutrition, sex, etc. The women you are talking about are not bodybuilder-related, agreed; but they are Testosterone-related.[/quote]
Well, the website does label itself as ‘bodybuilding’s think-tank’… so I’m expecting bodybuilding related material. At least on the main page.
Now, I can understand someone broadening their scope of understanding as to what this site is trying to do, but even if we are to remain testosterone-focused, how do pictures of nature fit in with that?
The previous ‘powerful-images’ definitely WERE lame.
[quote]disciplined wrote:
…
Now, I can understand someone broadening their scope of understanding as to what this site is trying to do, but even if we are to remain testosterone-focused, how do pictures of nature fit in with that?
[/quote]
The head honcho already explained it.
Read the 9th post on this thread.
[quote]disciplined wrote:
Well, the website does label itself as ‘bodybuilding’s think-tank’… so I’m expecting bodybuilding related material. At least on the main page.
Now, I can understand someone broadening their scope of understanding as to what this site is trying to do, but even if we are to remain testosterone-focused, how do pictures of nature fit in with that?
The previous ‘powerful-images’ definitely WERE lame.[/quote]
Is this really worth complaining about? What is two days worth of “different” pictures really going to do in the grand scheme of things? Do you think you will be less of a man by looking at them?
I have no prob with TC’s holiday photo selection. But that doesn’t mean I wont bust his balls because of it 
What is deemed “powerful” is subjective, fellas. Try to keep this in mind. May come in handy in more places than just this site.
[quote]PGA wrote:
I have no prob with TC’s holiday photo selection. But that doesn’t mean I wont bust his balls because of it :-)[/quote]
You can’t bust titanium balls, puny human!
Bear in mind that like Chuck Norris, TC can e-mail a roundhouse kick.
[quote]TC wrote:
You can’t bust titanium balls, puny human!
Bear in mind that like Chuck Norris, TC can e-mail a roundhouse kick.
[/quote]
Unlike you, its my slow time of the year. So all my guns can be blazing if the need arises!
Remember, for all of Chuck Norris’ fancy schmanchy kicks, Indiana Jones would just take out his revolver and take him out with one shot.
[quote]eengrms76 wrote:
disciplined wrote:
Well, the website does label itself as ‘bodybuilding’s think-tank’… so I’m expecting bodybuilding related material. At least on the main page.
Now, I can understand someone broadening their scope of understanding as to what this site is trying to do, but even if we are to remain testosterone-focused, how do pictures of nature fit in with that?
The previous ‘powerful-images’ definitely WERE lame.
Is this really worth complaining about? What is two days worth of “different” pictures really going to do in the grand scheme of things? Do you think you will be less of a man by looking at them?[/quote]
Look, all I’m doing is agreeing with the OP. The thread is titled, “Lame Ass Powerful Images”… I came in here, and I commented. I can assure you that do not feel any less manly due to seeing these nature images. But I felt like sharing my opinion. No, I’m not losing sleep over this problem, either.
disciplined,
Don’t sweat it. engrams must be just a troll (obligatory “just kidding” emoticon here!) 
The T-levels being high around here, we like a good argument, but we get over it fast because we are all part of the brotherhood. (Man law!)
Besides, you’ve gotta respect a guy who puts vids like yours up on his profile page. Nice job.
[quote]TShaw wrote:
disciplined,
Don’t sweat it. engrams must be just a troll (obligatory “just kidding” emoticon here!)
The T-levels being high around here, we like a good argument, but we get over it fast because we are all part of the brotherhood. (Man law!)
Besides, you’ve gotta respect a guy who puts vids like yours up on his profile page. Nice job.[/quote]
Cool man. Just sayin’: I don’t find those nature ‘Powerful Images’ very appropriate for the site. But that’s just me.
wow
[quote]TShaw wrote:
Don’t sweat it. engrams must be just a troll (obligatory “just kidding” emoticon here!) ;-)[/quote]
Dammit my secret is out.
To Disciplined- I wasn’t necessarily picking on you, just to all of the complainers in the thread.
In light of the response, I believe the pictures did exactly what TC hoped they would do.
