No doubt
I’ve had undergone four major surgical procedures over the past year
Recovery takes ages, with the added muscle wasting and whatnot i’d argue my recovery time could be cut down by around half if I were to use something… to note I make the decision to not use anything in the AAS department to expedite recovery outside of my TRT @100mg/wk.
Even that 100mg comes with distinct advantages.
- you can take painkillers without developing hypogonadism. Outside of tapentadol, all opiate/opiod painkillers induce secondary hypogonadism if you are taking them repeatedly.
- T levels are sustained at mid normal or so 24/7… even if you are sedentary, hardly sleeping due to pain and prolonged recovery times
All in all this means less muscle wasting. Deconditioning still occurs though.
There is a lot of data available suggesting AAS decreases recovery times following surgery. Back in the day apparently it wasn’t all that uncommon for people to be prescribed low doses of AAS to mitigate muscle wasting following major procedures.
Also a good body of data exists suggesting HGH may shorten recovery times. We still won’t see either being implemented if more targeted therapies are available… that and the stigma that exists (some validity but primarily mediated by sociopolitical agendas that began to unfold around the late 1980s)
Similar to painkillers… if HGH and AAS weren’t subject to a degree of regulation so stringent many physicians risk losing their licenses EVEN with appropriate prescribing doctors wouldn’t be nearly as hesitant to prescribe them.
My arguement is that Aus should decriminalise possession for personal use and legalising importation for personal use… stopping just short of legalising the products thus de facto enabling doctors to moniter patients without getting them in trouble. The laws aren’t stopping people from taking steroids, but many physicians are too scared to give forms for echocardiograms or provide blood tests for AAS users for fear of getting in trouble.
UK has the exact dynamic i’ve outlined above… and as a result clinics have popped up that allow for fairly liberal use of prescription TRT provided you actually need TRT (gotta go private though… but age doesn’t matter if you’ve actually got low T) and clinics exist specifically to moniter men who use higher doses… this allows men to get in and get out before they transition to full blown steroid induced cardiomyopathy, end stage renal disease etc.
Rescheduling them to S4 as opposed to S4 appendix D or S9 in NT and QLD (possession can =/= up to 20 years in prison… similar sentences are handed down for homicide) would also allow doctors to prescribe them for sarcopenia (Aus is looking at sarms for this… but the current sarms available don’t actually seem to be tissue selective…), cachexia etc again.
You can’t make tren legal… that’s absurd… but you can stop spending resources on ineffectively policing those who are stupid enough to take it, and you can create a dynamic that ultimately leads to considerably less burden on public healthcare sectors.
Do you really think a steroid user (esp in NT and QLD who is aware of the very harsh laws) cares about Australia’s steroid laws?
No… but i’d be willing to bet many would accept physician assisted monitering in the same manner by which we moniter smokers… and i’d be willing to bet many would stop using if they saw irreversible cardiac damage developing.
Ironically monitering smokers has led to less burden on healthcare sectors as some actually decide to quit when they’re informed of the risks and/or visibly see damage occuring via testing. I think you’d see the same dynamic unfold with steroids.
@Beyond_Beyond