So, any word on the fast paced impeachment process that is apparently underway?
NOTE TO READERS: Do not under any circumstances agree with me in the political arena, or you will be accused of having your lips attached to my ass, either by the master and commander of the known universe, the self-proclaimed pigeon amongst the statues, sometimes known as Assquatch, or his faithful sidekick Joe Weiner, also known as Weinerboy, who’s not sure if he wants to be insulting or funny.
Wait for it…
Look, a smiley, hahahah, that makes it all better doesn’t it. Sigh, I’m glad I was only joking. The stress buildup was a bit heavy for a moment.
[quote]vroom wrote:
So, any word on the fast paced impeachment process that is apparently underway?
NOTE TO READERS: Do not under any circumstances agree with me in the political arena, or you will be accused of having your lips attached to my ass, either by the master and commander of the known universe, the self-proclaimed pigeon amongst the statues, sometimes known as Assquatch, or his faithful sidekick Joe Weiner, also known as Weinerboy, who’s not sure if he wants to be insulting or funny.
Wait for it…
Look, a smiley, hahahah, that makes it all better doesn’t it. Sigh, I’m glad I was only joking. The stress buildup was a bit heavy for a moment.
Was this too subtle and vague?[/quote]
You know what’s funny, vroom? I was just heading here to post saying “hey, has anyone actually heard anything about this so called impeachment thing?”
I’m not sure I like “weinerboy”…how about “mighty joe weiner”?
So I’m the faithful sidekick of ol’ Giant-n-Hairy, huh…?
Well, it could be worse.
[quote]Joe Weider wrote:
Elkhntr1 wrote:
Vroom, you are a damned razor bro, a Razor! To bad it’s lost on many.
and you accuse me and my friends of being predictable?
Holy shit.
Admit it, Elk…you had that typed out even before vroom hit send.
[/quote]
Joseph, I do admire a quick biting wit and a lot of Vroom’s commentary is just that. You must admit what you like and makes you laugh can’t be helped.
To not be partisan in my admiration some of the guys on the dark side strike me in the same way. Like jerffy or Zeb they deliver some of their material with extremely biting wit and even though it may make me bristle at it’s content the delivery is hilarious.
You conversely come across like a whiner much of the time. Unless you’re fun and flirty JW cavorting with the vixens in cyberspace then you’re one smooth cyberspace operator!
So what about the impeachment? Now it’s Nadar’s turn, huh. This ought to be interesting.
And really vroom–
Your just mad because You got your ass handed to you in this thread. Let’s stay on topic. Everything I said in my first post wrt this memo and its publication has panned out. None of your double secret what ifs meant a damn.
It was a weak document with no supporting evidence. It just happened to back your position so you gave it credence. Live with it. Anything you got to say on topic, lets talk.
[quote]Elkhntr1 wrote:
Unless you’re fun and flirty JW cavorting with the vixens in cyberspace then you’re one smooth cyberspace operator![/quote]
nah…you’re just jealous.
Sorry Elk. Not to call bullshit on you, but I can’t remember the last time you said something like “damn, Zeb, that was pretty funny”…but you’ve applauded vroom at least once almost every page of this thread.
It’s not a big deal, we all have our biases after all…but like you feel the need to point out mine (true or not), I’m going to point out yours as well.
So, Elk…have you heard anything else about this impeachment thing?
PS–I don’t “cavort”.
I’m not physically capable of it.
[quote]sasquatch wrote:
So what about the impeachment? Now it’s Nadar’s turn, huh. This ought to be interesting.
And really vroom–
Your just mad because You got your ass handed to you in this thread. Let’s stay on topic. Everything I said in my first post wrt this memo and its publication has panned out. None of your double secret what ifs meant a damn.
It was a weak document with no supporting evidence. It just happened to back your position so you gave it credence. Live with it. Anything you got to say on topic, lets talk.[/quote]
I knew that assquatch comment was going to draw a certain yeti out of the woods!
[quote]vroom wrote:
So, any word on the fast paced impeachment process that is apparently underway?
NOTE TO READERS: Do not under any circumstances agree with me in the political arena, or you will be accused of having your lips attached to my ass, either by the master and commander of the known universe, the self-proclaimed pigeon amongst the statues, sometimes known as Assquatch, or his faithful sidekick Joe Weiner, also known as Weinerboy, who’s not sure if he wants to be insulting or funny.
Wait for it…
Look, a smiley, hahahah, that makes it all better doesn’t it. Sigh, I’m glad I was only joking. The stress buildup was a bit heavy for a moment.
Was this too subtle and vague?[/quote]
So vroom this makes 4 unprovoked negative posts wrt me, NICE!
Personal attacks are certainly your forte lately, but water off my back. I’m plenty secure in my life, that some internet wannabe won’t have that much impact. I wish you well and hope one day you can offer a bit more than this to the conversation. I’m not the only one who is finding your contributions lacking of late. And even though you say differently, your attitude has carried to other threads besides the political forum.
Time to shake off the hatred and move forward. I’ll even play nice and share my sandbox, if you make any effort at all in civility. Surprise me.
[quote]Elkhntr1 wrote:
sasquatch wrote:
So what about the impeachment? Now it’s Nadar’s turn, huh. This ought to be interesting.
And really vroom–
Your just mad because You got your ass handed to you in this thread. Let’s stay on topic. Everything I said in my first post wrt this memo and its publication has panned out. None of your double secret what ifs meant a damn.
It was a weak document with no supporting evidence. It just happened to back your position so you gave it credence. Live with it. Anything you got to say on topic, lets talk.
I knew that assquatch comment was going to draw a certain yeti out of the woods!
[/quote]
wrong!
I was on the road this afternoon and just to dangerous to drive and surf. But I am slightly disappointed in the unprovoked and continued infatuation from others. I mean, I am photogenic and all, but it still makes me a little queazy.
And quite frankly Elk, I’m a little surprised that your nose is so brown these days. I thought you a better man and one of principle. I still do mind you, just a little surprised your playing Robin these days to someone who is just plain spiteful and bitter.
True, Joe, I may have never posted it, but some of Zeb’s posts have struck me that way.
And yes, Joe, I am very jealous of all of your banter with the internet vixens who you will likely never meet in person. I wish, I could be like you instead of meeting women in the flesh and all of the benefits that brings.
Oh, I forgot they PM by the dozens with dirty pictures as well! How could I forget about the phantom PM world.
[quote]sasquatch wrote:
I’ll even play nice and share my sandbox,[/quote]
you play in a sandbox? Isn’t it a bitch to get all the sand out of all the long hair?
Does your wife give you grief about bringing it in the house with you?
[quote]vroom wrote:
So what about the impeachment? Now it’s Nadar’s turn, huh. This ought to be interesting.
Ah, all is right in the world, the master and commander of the known universe has not forsaken us. Thank goodness.
Never fear, pigeon man and weinerboy are together again. Here they come to save the day!
Anyway, is this thing still in process or something, I thought it was dead and that the sole purpose of this thread was to snipe?
If this thing is actually still in progress, then I still get to sit around with a wait and see attitude to see if anything comes of it.
[/quote]
I guess this means you choose not to stay on topic. I’m glad though, that you have reconciled your position on the ladder. Most people don’t care for my ass, let me know what you think as you look up.
[quote]vroom wrote:
Keep thinking that vroom. That’s simply one more put down to the American voters!
Zeb,
Oh biased one, that is not a put down at all. It is a simple fact of life, that people who are photogenic get higher approval ratings. It’s also true in Canada, and other countries, so spare me the anti-American mischaracterization.
Don’t blame me, blame the science that has done the research into this area.
The reason I said what I did was because the election was very very close in some swing areas. A little bit of shift due to some photogenicity and things might have been different.
It’s not some agenda to simply point out what may or may not be factually correct, but is simply speculation based on previously published research into human behavior.
Please, get a grip.
It’s an opinion, more conjecture really, and if you think I’m wrong, that is fine, but no need to go off the deep end and try to cast the comment into something it isn’t. Vintage Zeb![/quote]
And vintage vroom looking down on the American voters. You think that better looks would have turned the election in favor of Kerry is insulting!
[quote]Elkhntr1 wrote:
True, Joe, I may have never posted it, but some of Zeb’s posts have struck me that way.
And yes, Joe, I am very jealous of all of your banter with the internet vixens who you will likely never meet in person. I wish, I could be like you instead of meeting women in the flesh and all of the benefits that brings.
Oh, I forgot they PM by the dozens with dirty pictures as well! How could I forget about the phantom PM world. ;)[/quote]
And yet, we have only your word about all the wonderful warm and wet happenings you claim to have with real women. I’m betting you sit home watching MTV with a bottle of lotion.
[quote]vroom wrote:
Time to shake off the hatred and move forward. I’ll even play nice and share my sandbox, if you make any effort at all in civility. Surprise me.
I missed you Assquatch, Joe wasn’t able to keep up his side of the conversation without you.
I’m sort of getting stuck on the concept that I’m being pushed to be more PC by the crowd that generally rails against PC.
[/quote]
who
If you consider acting mature in both language and attitude PC, I guess I am pushing. Obviously the button has been pushed that cuases you to react so exaggerated.
I find it interesting though, that the only way you could keep up was for me to discontinue posting. I’ll give you another shot now.
