We try.
I’m going to assume virtually no one is going to agree with me on this, but what the hell I’ll say it anyway. I really don’t think the black slave trade by Europeans and white Americans was something to get upset about. As stated before, most black slaves bought were already slaves. Personally, between being a slave in Africa and a slave in America (assuming I was black, of course), I would chose America, but that’s just my personal opinion.
Also, consider the long term effects. Slavery has been abolished for black Americans, yet black on black slavery persists to this day in Africa. They average 10-20 IQ points higher (American blacks vs. African blacks) and are much wealthier. Hell, before the European conquest of Africa there were parts of Africa that didn’t even have the wheel.
I just find myself asking; would blacks really be better off today if Africa was left un-touched then?
[quote]Rohnyn wrote:
The revisionist Jew owned media likes to play up their victim story and pit other racial groups against eachother for the benefit of the plutocracy that has a large amount of Jews in it.
[/quote]
[quote]Rohnyn wrote:
We try.[/quote]
You haven’t told me yet why there were relatively so many jewish slavetraders.
[quote]kaaleppi wrote:
[quote]Rohnyn wrote:
We try.[/quote]
You haven’t told me yet why there were relatively so many jewish slavetraders.[/quote]
For all the things Jews are stereotypical for.
They get into exploitive businesses without any scruples. 130 years ago it was the same story.
If you want to spin a victim angle on that because of their time in Christian Europe, you can do that to. It’d be the same victim angle you spin on the National Socialists.
At some point you gotta stop the bullshit and just say the chicken hatched its own egg.
[quote]Rohnyn wrote:
[quote]kaaleppi wrote:
[quote]Rohnyn wrote:
We try.[/quote]
You haven’t told me yet why there were relatively so many jewish slavetraders.[/quote]
For all the things Jews are stereotypical for.
They get into exploitive businesses without any scruples. 130 years ago it was the same story.
If you want to spin a victim angle on that because of their time in Christian Europe, you can do that to. It’d be the same victim angle you spin on the National Socialists.
At some point you gotta stop the bullshit and just say the chicken hatched its own egg.[/quote]
Okay, now, they own their money and shares like all rich people of the world. If taxation is not an option (I don’t know if it is for you, but for most americans it isn’t) what would you like to see happen to balance things?
[quote]kaaleppi wrote:
[quote]Rohnyn wrote:
[quote]kaaleppi wrote:
[quote]Rohnyn wrote:
We try.[/quote]
You haven’t told me yet why there were relatively so many jewish slavetraders.[/quote]
For all the things Jews are stereotypical for.
They get into exploitive businesses without any scruples. 130 years ago it was the same story.
If you want to spin a victim angle on that because of their time in Christian Europe, you can do that to. It’d be the same victim angle you spin on the National Socialists.
At some point you gotta stop the bullshit and just say the chicken hatched its own egg.[/quote]
Okay, now, they own their money and shares like all rich people of the world. If taxation is not an option (I don’t know if it is for you, but for most americans it isn’t) what would you like to see happen to balance things?[/quote]
This is confusing. I assume you’re saying, if we aren’t evening the inequity through some kind of special Jew tax then how do we resolve it? That’s quite the loaded question. The problem isn’t Jewish people as an ethnic group, its the culture of usury in general. You’d be blind to say this culture doesn’t exist in if not permeate from the Jewish community.
Obviosuly focusing on Jews is injust, because the problem is much larger. It’d be like thinking one would stamp out theft by eliminating gypsies. One must destroy the culture of theft not a group that is most afflicted by it. Come to think of it the stereotype of a jew could be said to be a white collar gypsy…hmmm…anyways.
The way to solve thios inequity is to culturally disallow usury in the way you’ve seen muslim countries do with their banking system. Another thingis to get israel and jew lobby interests out of public education, political correct mandatws and ownership of the media. Really all three of those shouldn’t be ordained or controlled by anyone.
Further, instituting a blind republic, a pure meritocracy would be the path to grwatness once more. America needs to go postracial, no aa or anhthing just need based and meritocracy based services and scholarshios.
Btw in case u guys think I’m nuts…another fun fact. There is not a single black senator for 12% of the pop, there are 3 latino senators for 17% of the pop ans 4 asians…leaving 79 of a 100 being white. Altho there mite be a pretindian among them. So the only group that is overrepresented inthe congress are…drum roll…the Jewish people with 14 senators for their whopping 1% of the population. And Ppl say ur nuts if think Jews are running the country…pfff.
[quote]Rohnyn wrote:
[quote]kaaleppi wrote:
[quote]Rohnyn wrote:
We try.[/quote]
You haven’t told me yet why there were relatively so many jewish slavetraders.[/quote]
For all the things Jews are stereotypical for.
They get into exploitive businesses without any scruples. 130 years ago it was the same story.
If you want to spin a victim angle on that because of their time in Christian Europe, you can do that to. It’d be the same victim angle you spin on the National Socialists.
At some point you gotta stop the bullshit and just say the chicken hatched its own egg.[/quote]
Little story for you Rohnyn. Heard of the Rothschilds? They feature a lot in conspiracy theories about Jew bankers and such. Anyway, when I was in England last I stayed for a while in a lovely village called Tring. It’s about 30 miles north of London in Hertfordshire.
Tring is where Baron Lionel de Rothschild bought a 4000 acre estate. The Rothschilds built a museum and funded the building of large, terraced houses for Rothschild employees in Tring. They donated the vast majority of Tring Park and the museum to the community.
‘The English Rothschilds and members of the other branches in Europe were all major contributors to causes in aid of the Jewish people. However, many of their philanthropic efforts extended far beyond Jewish ethnic or religious communities. They built hospitals and shelters for the needy, supported cultural institutions and were patrons of individual artists. Their donation of works of art to various galleries has been the largest of any family in history.’
‘The Rothschild family has a long tradition of philanthropy, starting with Mayer Amschel Rothschild (1744-1812) and his five sons. From the very beginning their philanthropy was concerned with ensuring equal opportunities for disadvantaged groups across Europe. Other areas of support have included health care, housing and education. The Rothschild Foundation (Hanadiv) Europe continues this philanthropic tradition under the Chairmanship of Lord Rothschild and during the last ten years, we have supported a range of educational, cultural, heritage and community-based initiatives in over 40 European countries’
[quote]Rohnyn wrote:
This is confusing. I assume you’re saying, if we aren’t evening the inequity through some kind of special Jew tax then how do we resolve it? That’s quite the loaded question. The problem isn’t Jewish people as an ethnic group, its the culture of usury in general. You’d be blind to say this culture doesn’t exist in if not permeate from the Jewish community.
Obviosuly focusing on Jews is injust, because the problem is much larger. It’d be like thinking one would stamp out theft by eliminating gypsies. One must destroy the culture of theft not a group that is most afflicted by it. Come to think of it the stereotype of a jew could be said to be a white collar gypsy…hmmm…anyways.
The way to solve thios inequity is to culturally disallow usury in the way you’ve seen muslim countries do with their banking system. Another thingis to get israel and jew lobby interests out of public education, political correct mandatws and ownership of the media. Really all three of those shouldn’t be ordained or controlled by anyone.
Further, instituting a blind republic, a pure meritocracy would be the path to grwatness once more. America needs to go postracial, no aa or anhthing just need based and meritocracy based services and scholarshios.
Btw in case u guys think I’m nuts…another fun fact. There is not a single black senator for 12% of the pop, there are 3 latino senators for 17% of the pop ans 4 asians…leaving 79 of a 100 being white. Altho there mite be a pretindian among them. So the only group that is overrepresented inthe congress are…drum roll…the Jewish people with 14 senators for their whopping 1% of the population. And Ppl say ur nuts if think Jews are running the country…pfff.[/quote]
I was thinking more about progressive taxes, I’m scandinavian. A tax for a race, especially jews, sounds really bad, besides they can’t all be rich.
Every country has an upper class and wealth and power goes in families, even in democracies. There is a long way to go to meritocracy, but hey, it’s nevertheless partially functioning in the west. E: Thank you for your answer.
If anyone’s interested to know, ashkenazi jews make up roughly 25% of people with IQ’s over 140. People with IQ’s over 140 are the “world deciders” so to speak, so it isn’t far fetched to assume ashkenazi jews control about 25% of world affairs. That’s not to say they meet once a week an meticulously plot how the world will look tomorrow, just that as a group they do hold significant power.
[quote]Rohnyn wrote:
And Ppl say ur nuts if think Jews are running the country…pfff.
[/quote]
And Ppl say ur nuts if think statists are running the country…pfff.
Fixed…
lol let’s all complain about oriental students being “overrepresented” on tech uni’s campuses, blacks being “overrepresented” in the NBA and whites in the NHL.
[quote]Chushin wrote:
[quote]Rohnyn wrote:
Btw in case u guys think I’m nuts…another fun fact. There is not a single black senator for 12% of the pop, there are 3 latino senators for 17% of the pop ans 4 asians…leaving 79 of a 100 being white. Altho there mite be a pretindian among them. So the only group that is overrepresented inthe congress are…drum roll…the Jewish people with 14 senators for their whopping 1% of the population. And Ppl say ur nuts if think Jews are running the country…pfff.[/quote]
Wow, so “latino” and “Jewish” are races, just like black and white, eh?
And who exactly elected those Jewish senators, I have to wonder…[/quote]
The word Race was used zero times in that paragraph dumbshit. Good job. According to Jews they themselves are the master race, as they were the one blessed and chosen by God. As far as Latinos go they are a quasi-ethnic cultural group. Jews are also more aptly categorized as an ethno-religious group, they are anything but a ‘race’ overall.
You have to wonder, with a media that kicks up a haystorm over Romney being Mormon, why are they completley silent about the percentage plurality to statistical majority of Bankers, Politicians, Lawyers and all the other white collar dirt bag professions being Jews. Especially in the instance of Politics.
The reason is, that Jewish groups have a great amount of control over the media.
In case you haven’t been noticing that is what the NAACP already does. Actually its the opposite with Asian students, they have to achieve higher to get the same acceptance another student gets with lesser grades. I think we should have Affirmative Action in the NBA and NHL…how is that different from the workplace?
So if were going to justify the achievement gap with that bs statistic, how about the fact that any measure of an African nations or a Black communities IQ always has it fall about 20 points lower the ‘White’ American average. Wouldn’t this also be used to justify their lack of achievement in the same way your ‘Jews are master genius race’ justifies their over achievement. Wouldn’t people with super IQs see that ownership of human beings is immoral as well?
So if were going to justify the achievement gap with that bs statistic, how about the fact that any measure of an African nations or a Black communities IQ always has it fall about 20 points lower the ‘White’ American average. Wouldn’t this also be used to justify their lack of achievement in the same way your ‘Jews are master genius race’ justifies their over achievement. Wouldn’t people with super IQs see that ownership of human beings is immoral as well?[/quote]
I’m not making any case with this statistic, but since you’ve brought it up, yes black nations do suffer from having members with much lower IQ’s than Europeans or Asians ans jews have succeeded to a great degree from averaging IQ’s around 115. This IQ gap between jewish whites and non-jewish whites is about equal to the black/white IQ gap to put it into perspective. Morality aside, I’m not trying to justify slavery and I don’t agree with jewish slave owners. If anything my point was that the logical conclusion is that jews DO in fact have significant power within society whether it be in media, banking, congress, etc.
[quote]pushharder wrote:
[quote]Rohnyn wrote:
…According to Jews they themselves are the master race…
[/quote]
Schooling you on history is getting tiresome. This ^ is false.
This ^ is true.
[/quote]
I think that’s what Ro is saying, that because they view themselves as being blessed and chosen by God, they see themselves as the master race.