[quote]PRCalDude wrote:
orion wrote:
DeterminedNate wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:
Thomas Gabriel wrote:
I was originally in finance. I decided to quit after meeting so many graduates with shitty jobs. Econ is worse.
There is one option though: financial engineering. If you can get that degree, you will be paid handsomely. It is one of the hardest programs there is though. A lot of people have to start with a bachelors in mathematics just to prep themselves.
Financial engineering was what got us into our current economic mess. All of those “securitized” loans that were packaged up and sold overseas were made so by financial engineers through elaborate rube-goldberg financial contraptions. Everyone knows it now, and those jobs are being cut.
Seriously, I thought he was joking about that. They were paid handsomely because they manufactured money out of thin air.
Not really.
They spread risks and sold them to everyone willing to take them.
In a way, the very fact that the whole world is affected by the American real estate crisis shows how successful they really where.
We will still need these institutions in the future.
It’s surprising to hear an Austrian economist say that. We’ll need them? Do you mean that in the sense that, “We can’t just shoot them?” [/quote]
No, I literally mean we need them.
We need people who slice huge risks into tiny tranches and then sell it to everyone interested.
Whether you have one big insurance company backing you or thousands of small investors is irrelevant, someone must shoulder the risk of failure, it is just that risk averse investors should be more willing to buy smaller parts of risk than take all of it.
And did they not spread the risk around?
If banks in Europe go down, they must have done their jobs.
If those banks should have agreed to buy at these conditions is another matter.