No, they won’t.
Not surprised as the majority of the evidence says similar things.
Conclusions
In cost-effective terms, i.e. economic input versus clinical output, the USA healthcare system was one of the least cost-effective in reducing mortality rates whereas the UK was one of the most cost-effective over the period.
Right, but all of this is why I said for the common layman.
99% of the country is dead in the water at the “buy real estate with cash” part. You used to be able to build for retirement with getting a loan for an investment property, plan accordingly with a renter, rinse and repeat for riches.
Now the only avenues that are really available have being previously wealthy as a prerequisite. That’s why many in the mortgage industry thing the change was a shot purely at them, because it doesn’t impact the rich people doing it, only the non rich.
1 Like
Again, not surprised.
Why do we spend so much to get so little?
As power consolidates things get worse, not better.
I’m still seeing people get homes with the government 0%/3%/5% down programs. You can house hack a duplex->four plex and still use all those first time homebuyer programs while renting out the other units.
Or you could live in a SFH as your primary residence for the mandatory 2 years (government loans) and then rent it out.
If you can’t save 20% of the value of the asset you’re investing in you need to work on earning and saving so you can invest.
It’s all in how bad you want it. I want it real bad, just have to heal off all the damage from the failed business.
You’re so fuckin’ dense
I’m really glad all you do (to my knowledge) is post horseshit on the internet - I’d be scared if you had any real power or influence. It’s really amazing how ignorant you are.
1 Like
Which is cool, but the interest rates on those loans are such that you’re not able to dodge a massive amount of total expense. You’re just shifting it from Uncle Sam to your mortgage holder that was just done being bailed out by your very tax money.
But you don’t need 20% to make investment properties profitable after the tax change. In most places, you need 100%. The exceptions would be areas on the far left side of the bell curve in real estate costs
Quoted for truth. No kidding. Jesus, dude literally wrote:
While championing SINGLE payer
2 Likes
A.K.A. “deals”. Never ever pay retail. You have to buy poorly run or distressed properties and fix them or add value to make money. Especially when RE prices are rising.
Fuuuuuuuu… this guy
on a side note: I’m very on the fence about Anna Kendrick … sometimes I think she’s cute … other times I think she looks like a meth addict
So 59% and 75%, barely breaks 50?
For someone who calls everyone a douchebag, you don’t get sarcasm much do you
By left side of the bell curve in costs I mean cost of living areas.
For example, unless you can buy a property with cash, investment properties in California and Florida are nearly extinct in Q1FY2018. The same is not true of Montana and Michigan, that have SIGNIFICANTLY lower absolute values necessary to play the game.
Which means if you are ~70% of the country, you’re already living in an area that you’re dead in the water with non cash investment props just based on where you live. Then within that 30%, you still need to be relatively rich already to play the game.
True. However, the evidence is out there and I believe the masses has been made more aware than ever. It will be an interesting 2020 election. Hopefully will get some better choices, rather than a status quo politician and a candidate who has mostly come under the spell of the swamp.
I will wait for it as you SUCKERS are on the way out. As I’ve said, I hope the option for you to get little value is available.
If it ever passes, please Livestream your head exploding when marijuana and stem cell treatments are listed as electives and you have to buy a Cadillac plan to pay for them.
You sure are a dumb Comrade.
We have a winner!
1 Like
this is the most offensive post in this thread.
FUCK. YOU.
lol but actually I used to think she was unattractive. Now I think she’s incredibly sexy. she’s so weirdly polarizing.
4 Likes
But more importantly, sexy as hell.
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but unfortunately any opinions that play down Anna Kendricks hotness is wrong.
2 Likes
She’s my celeb crush and if you’re ever in Charm City I will fight you over this comment!
3 Likes